Can I get uuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh freedom of speech? > free

>>133358808
you're gettin'a FUCK YOU.

File: ha.png (8KB, 679x427px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 679x427px

>>133358870

File: neck yourself.jpg (232KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1920x1080px

>>133358808

>>133358808
>blocking people on your personal Twitter account violates the second amendment
really stimulated my cashews.

>>133360543
>>blocking people on your personal Twitter account violates the second amendment
>>second amendment

>blocked from personal account

Okay.

>>133358808
I hope they win simply because that means all social media can't block people anymore for anything.

literally what

Should blocking the POTUS be considered treason?

>>133360543

Uh anon...

The November 8th butthurt was that bad.

File: pure.jpg (26KB, 395x364px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 395x364px

>>133358808
this countries really going down the shitter huh

>>133360543
>Free Speech
>Second Amendment
I can guess who's not American.

>>133358808
Unironically hope they win

Trump blocked Twitter trolls but that guy Jules (the guy with the moustache + blue background DP) keeps spamming him. How the FUCK does he keep getting away with it?

They'll lose. Twitter isn't the govt. and you're allowed to block people.

If they win then that starts a new round of lawsuits. People that have been denied their right of speech by twitter itself. Milo, Ricky Vaughn, et al.

Kinda hoping they win

>>133358808
How is anyones free speech violated?

Do individual accounts and bots automatically deserve free speech like lmao you low iq niggermonkey, just make a fucking new account


Like how fucking stupid do you have to be.


Can't wait for these cucks to owe the pres tons of money

Twitter is a fucking private company you fucking retards God fucking damn you people are stupid

Teaches you two things:
1. Some people just dont give up, no matter their odds or how false/depraved their way is
2. These folks have no decency at all.

Disgusting. They were banned for a reason and they deserved it. Play stupid games like spam or hate commenting, you win stupid prizes.

Let alone that they have the nerve to sue, they should just swallow that pill and be ashames of themselves! Fucking degenerates

File: tay lives.png (602KB, 1000x733px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 1000x733px

>>133358870

>>133361176
No shit. Freedom of association.

>>133360941
>implying the only thing that actually gives free speech is anything other than the 2nd amendment

>>133358808
BLOMPF KLOMPFED

>it's against the constitution to block someone on your social media account
This is the left in 2017. What a time to be alive.

>>133358808
How the fuck is this a free speech issue and leftest don't see the hypocrisy in this?

Don't answer the least part.

File: 1481932369537.jpg (82KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 540x720px

>>133358808
>Call someone a shithead and threaten him and his family every single post he makes
>omg y u block me?

>>133358808
>free-speech group
Also known as a massive fucking scam to get morons to donate to what anyone with a functioning brain could tell you is a baseless cause.

>>133358808
The funniest part of this situation is that the group is backed by a legitimate school of law. They should really know better.

>>133358808

Blocking you from his twitter is not stopping free speech. He doesn't have to let you speak from the white house lawn either. He doesn't have to add your comments to his releases of documents to the public. The twitter account is a tool of the administration and you have know right to respond directly to his tweets.

The government does not have the right to limit your speech but you do not have the right to make the government amplify your speech.

>>133358808
His twitter is his as a private citizen though... If it was 'owned' by the government, that might be something, but sheesh this is silly.

>>133358808
You dumb motherfuckers don't even know what a lawsuit is. It's literally just going to die in process. Lolololol

>>133360941
>>133362154

This. Could have been a subtle point but I doubt it.

Freedom of speech is for people I agree with.

>>133360740

They will argue its his government official president account that should have this application.

>>133358808
Twitter bottom feeders are the cancer of the Earth.

I get blocked all the time. If they win, that means we can sit post freely and since hatespeech is covered by the second amendment Twitter and kikebook will become a warzone.

>>133361559
>Create new account
New accounts don't get a blue checkmark
No blue checkmark means their insults won't be seen
Their insults not being seen means their existence has no meaning
They are suing to validate their existence again, Trump stole it from them.

>>133360740
In typical liberal fashion I'm sure they'll claim that private citizens are exempt from the "no blocking rule".

Now what would be more interesting is that this has the potential to make it so Twitter can't censor anything -- it's a public forum for free speech, after all. This may backfire on (((them))), assuming it goes through, which it won't.

>>133362939

They know enough to get paid for this bullshit.

>left always using the excuse that twitter is a private platform

>they said free speech doesnt apply when people are wrongly banned

>now they turn that around and cry like little bitches

TWITTER IS A PRIVATE PLATFORM

CRY MORE KEKS

>>133363207
>>133363007
>>133363003
>>133362986
>>133362817
>>133362788
>>133362732
>>133362649
>>133362474
>>133362154
>>133362145
As usual, the rural and suburban retards on /pol/ prove they can't read, therefore they didn't read the article.

The lawsuit is not over the first amendment, rather the group claims that since drumpf in the president (unfortunately), his statements are considered presidential statements from the government, and blocked users are unable to see these statements. Therefore blumpf is preventing them from hearing government policy.

A private company like Twitter can censor anything it wants because it's not the government so you have no rights on Twitter. Checkmate racists.

I'm suing Donald Trump for violating my rights on a the privately owned website Twitter.

>>133363236
The funniest part is that they still reply to him after getting blocked. They set on notifications and wake up in the middle of the night in order to reply to #NotTheirPresident . Gets me everytime.

File: 1494659434949.jpg (677KB, 1075x1326px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1075x1326px

>>133363562
>since drumpf in the president (unfortunately), his statements are considered presidential statements from the government

So you're saying that the two scoops he asked for were also presidential statements?

>>133363217
If you block them, they win

>>133363562
And anyone who's not a moron knows there's a difference between @POTUS and @realdonaldtrump, and that preventing users from spamming comments in no way detracts from the ability to read his communications.

>>133358808
>freedom of speech means you have to listen to us whine
My country has lost it's fucking mind.

>>133363562
>and blocked users are unable to see these statements.
They're not, though. They're visible to anyone who's not logged in.

File: 1495413291252.jpg (54KB, 670x377px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 670x377px

>>133360543

Read the bill of rights 'Republican'

>>133363562
>drumpf
>blumpf

If you want people to take you even remotely seriously you need to stop.

>>133363562
So what's stopping them from getting his policies from other platforms. If I go smash my TV does that mean that he now needs to use a different form of communication to tell me it m otherwise it's violation of my rights?

This seems like as good a time as any to announce my class-action lawsuit against swaglord.

File: you.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>133363562

>>133363562
Every thing he types is official?
Since when?

>Why aren't the same standards placed on the Democrats. Look what Hillary Clinton may have gotten away with. Disgraceful!
>Remember, when you hear the words "sources say" from the Fake Media, often times those sources are made up and do not exist.
>My son, Donald, will be interviewed by @seanhannity tonight at 10:00 P.M. He is a great person who loves our country!

This shit is so official, better renew the journalists' ability to free speech again

>>133363562
>and blocked users are unable to see these statements

>can't see the tweets
>log out
>see tweets

Probably too much though for a liberal though.

>>133364171
They have bots that reply the first second Trump tweets something, the blue checkmark keeps their tweet immediately at the top. They can't sustain an income when they're no longer able to leach off Trump's platform

File: liberals.jpg (113KB, 665x654px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 665x654px

>>133363616
>violating my rights

What right? Can you cite the law which gives you this right and explain how it is being broken?

Remember when Twitter threatened to ban Trump from doing his funposting, and the DNC was all for that? BLONDALMDA FLBUMPF remembers.
the really funny thing is since Twitter sold so much of itself out to the Saudis and Qataris, they won't even censor ISIS posting since the Saudis and Qataris approve of the Islamic State beheading videos posted to tweeter.

>>133360721
it is his personal account. the official one is @POTUS and he didn't block them there.

>>133364473
>double-barreled funtweeting
Brilliant move, really.

File: 1493603148031s.jpg (2KB, 125x93px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x93px

>>133360543
>second amendment
LEAF

File: photo.jpg (58KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 900x900px

>>133358808
You guys don't see the opportunity here.
If they win, this could potentially remove the mute / block features on twitter resulting in mass hysteria and spam on certain accounts. Without them able to do anything as a result.

Losing the battle doesn't mean you lost the war.

>>133358808
>treats his tweets as official WH statements
>blocks users
>gets sued for denying them freedom of speech

>treats his tweets as personal comments
>posts offensive and defamatory tweets
>gets sued for libel

4D chess huh?

File: IMG_0349.jpg (29KB, 589x250px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 589x250px

>>133364444
>tfw no one checks digits anymore

And they said this was the best timeline

>>133363562
>blocked users are unable to see these statements
They're completely able to see them. They just have to log out.

>>133365218
are you merely pretending right now?

>>133365855
indeed my friend

If they, by some miracle, win this.. that would mean that no government indilvidual is allowed to block anyone, right?

File: 2 party system 2.jpg (102KB, 500x358px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 500x358px

>>133365218
>freedom of speech

Which law provides for freedom of speech (citation needed), explain how this law is being violated.

>>133358808
As much as the inconvenience blocking is, they do know they can still READ everything by logging off twitter, or more easily set to private browse? Twitters concept of "blocking" is a joke.

>>133363562
>and blocked users are unable to see these statements
That is wrong

>>133366786
Of course he is. 90% of the liberal shit said here is just shitposting.

>>133363562
>The lawsuit is not over the first amendment, rather the group claims that since drumpf in the president (unfortunately), his statements are considered presidential statements from the government, and blocked users are unable to see these statements. Therefore blumpf is preventing them from hearing government policy.
The tweets are widely disseminated by the media. This argument is akin to wanting to be inside the wh briefing room because you don't wanna watch people get spiced on television.

>>133358808
The left is truly desperate. They don't even like the damn constitution and want to pull this shit.

>>133363562
this.
>>133367071

File: 10418733006.jpg (461KB, 984x1248px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 984x1248px

liberals today are persecuted more than ever

File: image.jpg (25KB, 341x294px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 341x294px

>>133358808

>>133358808
you can just log out or use a different browser, besides he tweets on his personal acct not POTUS, and yes im aware his personal tweets are govt archived as well, if you want them so bad then use the congressional library where they're archived

File: benis.png (193KB, 500x436px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 500x436px

>>133358808
>if i do it its ok
the salt will keep flowing for the next 7+ years

File: 1494980362769.jpg (44KB, 732x490px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 732x490px

>>133358870
kek'd

>>133364444
nice digits. the truth value of your statement has been upgraded