Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10
File: images (11).jpg (7KB, 225x225px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 225x225px
What's the difference between capitalism and communism? Both are about sucking up to the richer class while poor people get poorer
>>
File: militia.jpg (62KB, 640x458px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 640x458px
>>133311835
They are both part of a false dichotomy. Third Positionist systems are the true way forward.
>>
both are tools of the jew, capitalism is the embracement of greed, communism the embracement of envy.
>>
>>133311835
Under communism, the Jews win.
Under capitalism, the Jews win, but it's less brutal and obvious.
>>
>>133311835
communism has thinner people
>>
Communism is very literally just authoritarian leftism at this point, it's just controlling society with the purpose of manipulating the well being of hierarchical groups with social engineering and big states.
Capitalism is any natural system that arose though trade. It's not a new thing, Venice has had a notable capitalist system just like ours but with less technology since the Roman times.
>>
>>133312430
Venice didn't have capitalism. Marx hadn't invented it yet.
>>
File: 1490531320376.jpg (881KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
881KB, 1920x1080px
>>133311835
Capitalism is what every country is using now.
Communism is you work however much you want and also get whatever you want
>india education
>>
>>133312602
awooo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70E9KA48Sic
>>
>>133312602
>Communism is you work however much you want
And if you choose not to? Are you entitled to anything? If so, how is this sustainable and how does this not promote laziness? If not, exactly how is this different to capitalism besides unlimited unpaid holidays?
>>
File: 1487304296872.png (151KB, 310x361px) Image search:
[Google]
151KB, 310x361px
>>133311835
Communism results in that in practice, but in theory, it's about equality. Capitalism on the other hand, is radically hierarchical, pitting every individual against every other individual, although in practice, people still have group interests.
Communism results in hellish poverty and dysfunction, but necessitates steeling oneself and relying on others. Capitalism results in prosperity and function at the expense of the spirit, resulting in the relative breakdown of groups and values, the lack of any meaning beyond money leading to hedonistic behavior.
National socialism was an attempt to have both prosperity and direction. I think it succeeded in the short term. We'll never know what would have happened if the Germans were less warlike.
>>
File: 1499313452891.jpg (44KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 500x500px
>>133312244
I like this post.
>>
File: 1488305495367.jpg (244KB, 1033x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
244KB, 1033x1500px
>>133312873
If you just lie in your bed you'll certainly feel ashamed when other people are working to feed your ass.
You choose whatever you're interested to work with though, very different from the wageslavery of capitalism.
Communists basically assume that human nature is okay tier, not completely evil and animalistic
>>
>>133311835
Mein Kampf, Das Kapital, and Wealth of Nations should be required reading before posting about economics.
>>
File: salute.jpg (575KB, 3137x2353px) Image search:
[Google]
575KB, 3137x2353px
>>133313261
>You choose whatever you're interested to work with though
And therein lies the problem with communism. Good luck getting anybody to do the dirty and rough jobs nobody wants to do.
>>
>>133313261
>If you just lie in your bed you'll certainly feel ashamed when other people are working to feed your ass.
Not everyone, this kind of shame involves a mature self awareness which most people don't have. Everyone thinks they're uniquely special and deserving of more than the other.
>You choose whatever you're interested to work with though, very different from the wageslavery of capitalism.
Agreed, but same with capitalism until literal Marxists started imposing quotas on industries with stereotypes they didn't like, like no more white men in STEM. Until this, until Marxism, you too could have chosen any work you want.
>Communists basically assume that human nature is okay tier, not completely evil and animalistic
I actually use this to explain why Islam might be left wing authoritarianism, if you just assume people are evil and that it's "wrong" to change that or it's "wrong" to point out or wrong to not tolerate and accept them, you are left wing. Likewise, Muslim authorities accept Muslim men as rapists so they even go so far as to blame and punish women. Putting aside that feminism is usually left wing, this feels even more so even if it's anti feminist.
>>
File: 1499398148973.jpg (165KB, 865x966px) Image search:
[Google]
165KB, 865x966px
>>133312004
>Third positionism
>Class collaboration
>''Our interests are exactly the same because we share ancestry lol''
Take the fourth position pill, my brother
>>
>>133313972
No, take the 5th position pill and embrace Distributism. There shall be only one class, and it will be the capitalists.
>>
>>133313972
What's the difference between nazbol and being a homosexual?
Thread posts: 20
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10