prove you are not a blind follower and name some critisisms

>>133265945
Terrible military strategist

File: 11.png (169KB, 442x433px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 442x433px

>>133265945
He didn't kill all the kikes...

>>133265945
Autistic about race
Autistic in general
Too much into spoopy spiritual/mystical bullshit

>>133265945
haavara transfer agreement is the dumbest idea ever, if you're trying to exterminate all jews why would you allow and assist jews to transfer out of germany and keep their wealth intact.

>>133266291
Beat me to it.

>>133265945
He was Chr*stian

>>133266414
Havaara Transfer Agreement wasn't about exterminating Jews and Hitler didn't want to ext- Oh wait...

>>133265945
Should've been more aggressive fighting the UK

Mein Kampf is a shitty book not worth reading even for white nationalists.

>>133265945
(((SOCIALIST)))
and liked muslims

>>133266291
Second post best post.

He made a fucking mess and ultimately failed.

>>133265945
Hitler only had one testicle.
Manlet confirmed.

>>133265945
Relied on cancerous people like Göring, who fucked up the Invasion of Britain an was addicted to Morphin

>>133265945
He didn't go far enough
Should have won at Dunkirk
Should not have tried to make peace with countries that declared war on Germany
Russia was a bad idea he should have bunkered down and waited for an attack

Concentration camps were dumb, should have deported the Jews to Palestine or something since they would have done the gassing and Germany would stay great again instead of crushed.

>>133265945
lack of tactical sense, like during BoB canceling push on UK airfields (RAF was on bring of breaking down) and switching to bombing towns giving RAF much needed break

and thats just first, he made gorillion idiotic decisons that costed reich war, hell if he would get assasinated by that coup we would have Reich winning WWII

File: bunny girl frog.jpg (39KB, 650x433px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 650x433px

>>133266611
chick-checkity-checked

>>133266348
Himler was the occultist. Hitler gets the blame for everything done in the party, but he was just the figure head.

Every Nazi leader contributed.

>>133266572
This. The whole book is just "Fuck what my dad says" the novel.

>>133265945
Allied with us and Japan, useless allies.

>>133265945

Hitler admits his biggest mistake was taking the rump Czech state and turning it into a protectorate. Up until that point, he could say he was just uniting all German people into one country, but taking in non-Germans disproved that intent.

Hitler also didn't have an appreciation for the kind of pressures democratically elected politicians could come under. Taking over the rump Czech state completely sawed the legs out from under Neville Chamberlain and boosted the war faction led by Winston Churchill and Anthony Eden, forcing Chamberlain to give the Polish guarantee, in essence, the death warrant of the British Empire.

Aslo, he didn't kill all the kikes.

>>133265945
Muzzie lover. Why oh why? Were they tools only for temporary use I hope?

>>133265945
He is certainly no Michael Phelps. That guys finishes a race.

He would look better clean shaven

Killed millions of white europeans because he couldn't contain his lebensraum autism, ruined nationalism in Europe forever.

>>133265945
He didn't kill enough Germans

>>133265945
He interfered with his generals too much beyond that there are no legitimate criticisms to be made.

>>133266494
kill yourself td

>>133267242
This. Everyone in the whole damn world just blamed everything wrong they did on Hitler.

>>133265945
He killed other Whites, such as Poles.

>>133267295
>Allied with us and Japan, useless allies.
Italy? Absolutely.

"When I pass judgment, objectively and without emotion, on events, I must admit that my unshakeable friendship for Italy and the Duce may well be held to be an error on my part. It is in fact quite obvious that our Italian alliance has been of more service to our enemies than to ourselves. Italian intervention has conferred benefits which are modest in the extreme in comparison with the numerous difficulties to which it has given rise. If, in spite of all our efforts, we fail to win this war, the Italian alliance will have contributed to our defeat!

The greatest service which Italy could have rendered to us would have been to remain aloof from this conflict. To ensure her abstention, no sacrifices, no presents on our part would have been too great. Had she steadfastly maintained her neutral role, we would have overwhelmed her with our favours. In victory we would have shared with her all the fruits and all the glory. We would have collaborated with all our hearts in the creation of the historic myth of the supremacy of the Italian people, the legitimate sons of the ancient Romans. Indeed, anything would have been preferable to having them as comrades in arms on the field of battle!
...
Neither my personal affection for the Duce nor my instinctive feelings of friendship for the Italian people have changed. But I do blame myself for not having listened to the voice of reason, which bade me to be ruthless in my friendship for Italy. And I could have done so, both to the personal advantage of the Duce himself and to the advantage of his people. I realize, of course, that such an attitude on my part would have offended him and that he would never have forgiven me. But as a result of my forbearance things have happened which should not have happened and which may well prove fatal. Life does not forgive weakness." - Adolf Hitler, Last Testament, Feb 17th, 1945.

letting the Jews leave to palestine with there wealth intact was a mistake. He should've sent them to Madagascar like he originally intended. Imagine if the Jews were all in Madagascar rn we'd have peace on earth.

>>133265945

He was too kind and merciful.

He lost

File: 1455636929512.jpg (293KB, 1041x760px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1041x760px

He let his allies pissed off team 'MERICA

>>133265945

He was too moderate and tried to deport people who clearly would seek revenge. He let Rohm undermine him for too long before executing him, and its painful to read the things he had said about Hitler, unpunished.

File: kawaiihitler.png (880KB, 953x904px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 953x904px

>>133265945
He was too pure for this world.

File: holyhoax.jpg (293KB, 1241x688px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1241x688px

>>133265945
He was too soft on the Jews. He should have actually done the Holocaust so they wouldn't have to fake it.

>>133268441
It's sad, yeah. But most people overlook Japan because it has animu and cute traps. They are the ones who gave the USA a reason to join the war after all, but you're absolutely right when it comes to Italy.

File: Ovens2.jpg (137KB, 721x940px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 721x940px

>>133268850

Theres always next time.

>>133265945
He was incapable of listening to critisicm and of leaving strategies to his generals; thus resulting in the failure of operation Barbarossa and the war.

>>133265945
he lost the war, made too many enemies and didn't cooperate with his allies enough.

>>133268439
poles are jews, not whites,

>>133265945
he supported veganism. if you eat like cattle you will be treated like cattle

A Fucking CIS White Male!!!

>>133266414
haavara agreement was actually pretty smart. Too bad it went to shit due to the war

>>133269067

He lost the war because 4 great powers waged war on them, a newly formed power made up of many small nations. It was simply too many enemies. Mussolini was an idiot, his (failed) invasion of Greece which was totally unnecessary, and his being deposed and put in prison at one point - both needing Hitler to bail him out proves if anything it was him who was refusing to coordinate enough with Hitler. Mussolini was bitter that Hitler, who he perceived as being #2 to Mussolini's #1, had turned the tables and the the perceived tail was now wagging the dog.

>>133265945
Should have attack russia last, after he sorted out all fronts

File: icebreaker2.jpg (36KB, 339x500px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 339x500px

>>133269855
Russia was planning to invade him. His attack actually caught Stalin off guard and was probably timed at about as good of a point as he could have chosen.

>>133266348
Too fucking soft on shitskins

>>133269333
What about Japan?

>>133265945
>Let's mass-murder whites for my globalist masters, u guise.

http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/05/hitler-was-financed-by-federal-reserve.html

>>133265945
Retarded military strategy
Retarded economics
Retarded hierarchy structure in/out of party
Commitment issues (peak arms production not reached until 1942/3)
Retarded levels of unquestionable totalitarianism
Good aesthetic

>>133270340

>lets be a retarded lemming and spread stupid bullshit guiz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE0gu5cjwCo

All these retarded smears and they still cant prove the holohoax.

>>133265945
awful military strategist who should have listened to the leaders of his military.

File: 1485119163638.png (345KB, 593x592px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 593x592px

>>133265945
He was a wolfaboo.

File: 1489093634560.jpg (48KB, 437x599px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 437x599px

>>133265945
he lost

>>133265945
Shut the fuck up. I don't know how people fall for these idiotic shill threads.
>"Hi goys, I'm totally one of you, but please insult this guy for me"
There are threads like this all the time, not just for hitler, but for everyone you leftist faggots don't like.

>>133265945

didn't kill enough jews

File: Der Fuhrer 2.jpg (536KB, 1500x1049px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1500x1049px

>>133265945
My only grievance against Hitler is that he lost.

>>133265945
faggy mustache

>>133265945
Not properly preparing for a long war.
Not pressuring Japan to attack the Soviets.
Bombing London.

>>133265945
Loving islam, no thanks.
he seems to just be a german officer who rose above german royalty, and made everyone larp as romans.

>>133265945
Stalinism was better than capitalism. He shouldn't have attacked the USSR.

>>133265945
he was a mortal

>>133265945
Too stubborn and inflexible when the situation called for a change in tactics.
His order to stand their ground saved the Wehrmacht from being routed in winter '41 but led to unnecessary losses in men and equipment almost every time afterwards.

>>133265945
Ethnic SJW/Commie

>>133271289
>bombing london
Only after Churchill bombed German cities including Berlin for 3 months straight.
Also the first bombing on London was a lone HE-111 that got lost.

File: 1498397194160.jpg (109KB, 704x914px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 704x914px

>>133265945
Too perfect for this degenerate world.

File: 123.jpg (16KB, 243x208px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 243x208px

Beginning a war impossible to win.
I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure the Reich could not possibly win WW2. Is there any scenario where Germany comes out on top?

>>133267320
I always thought that the guarantee was given to ruin any possible soviet german alliance after the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact
the soviet's themselves thought that the west was helping hitler get closer to russia

>>133271869
Still, it was a mistake that cost the Luftwaffe and a chance at peace.

>>133270099
Planning to attack him because he conquerd countries close to russia's territory, so they have foreseen it, he should had kept it slow in that area, like he did with stalin in poland, to be like their friend, sorthing his other fronts, and then stab them in the neck full force

>>133265945
Being interested in art is kinda gay

>>133265945
>name some critisisms of this man
Not gassing 6 million jews

>>133272095
If they didnt decide to invade Russia like fucking autists they couldve pulled it off

Assuming the Japs didn't go full retard and bomb the US

>>133270182

Japan was collateral damage for Roosevelt to get his war with Germany. In short, Japan was the war he needed in order to get the war he wanted.

Roosevelt wanted war with Germany and pretty much instigated it from the start. But, public opinion was 80% against getting involved in Europe. All through 1940 and 41, Roosevelt had been conducting a secret naval war with Germany. He told the British cabinet that he would keep ramping up the provocations until Hitler declared war. The problem was that Hitler wasn't taking the bait.

In early 1941, Roosevelt tried convincing people that Hitler was planning to invade the Americas, but that was ridiculous because Hitler couldn't get across 22 miles of English Channel, so how could he get across 3,000 miles of Atlantic Ocean?

Around the time of the Atlantic Conference in July 1941, Roosevelt seemed to latch onto the idea that provoking war with Japan and letting them make the first move would turn American opinion around. So, Roosevelt embargoed the sale of oil which would cripple Japan within 6 months. Roosevelt knew that the Japanese would go to war because that subject came up a year earlier.

By ignoring Japanese overtures to negotiate and by issuing an ultimatum (i.e. the Hull Note), Roosevelt knew the Japanese would strike somewhere, but no one was quite sure where.

When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, US public opinion did a 180. Hitler did declare war four days later because he was tired of the pretense that the US was neutral.

Incidentally, Pearl Harbor didn't have enough planes or AA guns to defend itself because those had been sent to Britain and the Soviet Union as part of Lend-Lease.

>>133273050
>If they didnt decide to invade Russia like fucking autists they couldve pulled it off
THE WHOLE POINT OF THE WAR WAS FOR RUSSIAN LAND

>>133272604
>chance at peace
Churchill never intended peace with Germany to begin with or he would have accepted Hitler's offers of peace talks after Poland and France's defeat.
There were peace movements in Britain up until late 1941 so the Blitz didn't do much to hamper that.

It did cause unnecessary losses for the Luftwaffe though, for sure.

>>133267320
Where did he admit that the Czech campaign was a mistake?
Didn't he initially just take the Sudetenland, which was German anyway? Then he took the rest of Czech lands, but what was his reasoning? And why did he later regret it?

>>133265945
Thought he could conqour the soviets, British and take over the colonies in africa all while supporting the endeavours of a bad Ally

>>133266077
He conquered almost all of Europe and held it for 6 years, tell me you could do that with the same resources? Hindsight is 20/20. Although I'll admit that he should have invaded the UK and taken hold of all of it to prevent giving the United States a place to settle and gather strength.

Also on this topic: why do people hate genocide during war so much? I mean that crimes against humanity don't really exist. During war, those who self-impose rules on them are at a disadvantage right off the bat. I don't think anything is off the table, like the Japanese efforts show: it works and is the entire point of war. That's why they say war is hell, because it is man's raw form. I don't really think any nation should ever have any rules: the point of a war is total annihilation of the enemy, no limitations involved.
Thoughts?

>>133265945
he was a retard for attacking Stalingrad and not going directly for the oil fields in the caucus mountains

>>133273494
how was he going to get past the british navy?

>>133266572
I was thinking about taking out a second mortgage to buy this £158,000 copy of Mein Kampf.

>>133265945
delayed invasion of russia to help out that retard mussolini in the balkans

>>133265945

He would have won had he not let the British escape and not attacked Russia in winter unprepared.

>>133265945
He didn't actually kill six million Jews.

he wasnt wing enough lol
trump is perfect tho

>>133265945
Trusted the Catholic church and thus knowingly or not supported the same people he fought against.

>>133273622
Planes, paratroopers, and he could have just tried to out number them. Also, he could have used submarines to sneak past them. Use spies and defectors to blow up their military held harbors and such.

>>133266291
SPBP

>>133265945

Killed slavic people like a faggot instead of allying with them

>>133265945

He ruined things towards the end of the war with his drug fuel mania.

He forgot his people were still human.

>>133273189
Fair enough. But bombing lords castles likely would have got them supporting peace.

>>133273273
>Where did he admit that the Czech campaign was a mistake?
Good question. Source:

"When we solved the Sudeten question by force we liquidated Czechoslovakia at the same time-and left all the blame squarely on Benes' shoulders. The Munich solution could not have been anything but provisional, for, obviously, we could not tolerate in the heart of Germany an abscess, small though it was, like an independent Czech State. We lanced the abscess in March 1939, but in circumstances that were psychologically less favourable than those which would have obtained, had we settled the issue by force in 1938. For in March 1939, for the first time, we put ourselves in the wrong in the eyes of world opinion. No longer were we restricting ourselves to reuniting Germans to the Reich, but were establishing a protectorate over a non-German population." - Adolf Hitler, Political Testament, Feb 25th, 1945

Yes, the Sudetenland was ceded to Germany in Oct, 1938. In March 1939, the Slovaks declared an independent Slovakia. That left just the rump Czech state left surrounded by Germany and it's allies. This was a sore point. Earlier, Benes had signed a mutual defense treaty with the Soviet Union, one of the terms allowed the Soviets to use Czech airbases. So the decision was made to turn it into the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia.

>>133273612
Would have gotten flanked and trapped. Stalingrad secured the Caucasus mountains

File: 1485211316834.jpg (44KB, 460x460px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 460x460px

Didn't Actually commit holocaust or general plan ost
>wasted a bunch of resources on super projects
>trusted the Japanese over the Chinese

He wasn't Muslim

>Had everything he could have ever needed to win the war within 5 years
>completely ruin everything
>destroy europe
>destroy the country you were trying to make great
>give half of europe to communists
>cause nationalism to go taboo
>cause the rise of cultural marxism
>cause a massive left wing shift throughout the world
>worst military commander ever
>doesn't understand the importance of tactical retreat, or many other strategic advantages
>did not produce the first assault rifle in 1943
>waited until 1945 to start producing the jet fighter
>did not bomb actual military outposts during the battle of Britain, one of his biggest blunders on the western front.
>DIDN'T WIN WW2

he was lazy and reliant

>>133274623
Unfortunately, I do disagree with that decisioning process to, but it seems as if the circumstances warranted it ("we could not tolerate in the heart of Germany an abscess, small though it was, like an independent Czech State"). It would be the same as if there was a plot of land uncontrolled by no state in the middle of the US. Again, seems like more of a leadership issue, but everything up until the point of Anschluss with Austria, Danzig, and the Sudetenland were perfectly warranted given the aftermath of the treaty.

Another question: what was his reasoning for taking Poland, too? Was it just Western Poland, where the majority of the German population was located? Because it seems as if the same reunification isn't justified because they were Poles. Or did he change gears to take all of Poland after the French/British declared war?

Also, what do you think about this statement: >>133273502

Welll he didnt kill all the jews thats why im not a follower of him.

>>133265945
He made the kikes invulnerable with MUH SIX BAZILLION

>>133265945
Was severely addicted to drugs even before the war started. If he was clean and not prone to random outburst where he would make rash decisions things could have went differently.

File: 14690946_790765714360315_8213923529075490966_n.jpg (75KB, 720x770px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 720x770px

>>133273502
The point of war is to prove a point, or to attain a goal, rather than simply to annihilate; annihilation may be a target yet it's not a necessity.

File: Muslim members of the Waffen-SS 13th division at prayer during their training in Germany, 1943.jpg (103KB, 1200x816px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1200x816px

>>133265945
he allied himself with Muslims

>>133265945
absolute shit at war

went full REEEEEEEE to conquer stalingrad which was a terrible decision

he's a conceptually good man, a visionaire, an artist, but not a good war man.

File: 1497938019425.jpg (35KB, 292x370px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 292x370px

>>133265945
shitty haircut and too self conscious about himself.

>>133276031
You cannot prove the point without casualties. Arbitrarily imposing limitations would make it substantially more difficult to achieve the point. I just despise the weak-willed quasi-pacifism when it comes to war these days. You want to defeat a people, completely destroy them or don't. Arabs castrated their slaves for a reason.

>>133275215

If I had been there, I would have advised Hitler to be generous with the Czechs and give the new Czech President all support. Edvard Benes, who was a dictator with a thin veneer of democracy and who had been conducting slow motion ethnic cleansing since 1919, had fled to England and was out of the picture.

The problem was that Hitler had little appreciation for the pressures that democratic politicians can come under. Taking over the Czech state completely sawed the legs out from under Neville Chamberlain and boosted the war faction in the British Parliament. Shortly after, Chamberlain issued his ill fated guarantee to Poland.

His beef with Poland? Danzig whose population was 97% German. Created by the Treaty of Versailles as a "free city" but under complete economic and political domination of Poland. Also, the Treaty promised plebiscites in the areas of the corridor and upper Silesia, but the Poles refused to hold these. Hitler offered to guarantee Polish borders in exchange for the return of Danzig and a rail/road corridor through Poland.

>>133265945
manlet

File: Attraction (Shadow Theatre Group) 1st Audition Britain's Got Talent 2013.jpg (57KB, 1280x1037px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1280x1037px

>>133268626
This 2bh.

>>133276358
I can just imagine a thousand screaming Hitler Pepes charging at Stalingrad and spraying MP40s.

>>133275215

About >>133273502

The problem with the concept of "total war" is that it sounds good when you're winning. Not so much if you're losing.

The whole point of the Hague and Geneva conventions was to bring some kind of civility to war and separate, both physically and symbolically, the combatants and non-combatants.

That's the carrot, so what is the stick? Answer: Bad behavior on one side will be repaid with bad behavior on the other.

>>133277005
more like thousand screaming in unison red soldiers forming a mighty low voice REEEEEEEEE charging at nazis cause staling issued a 277 command which basically meant: we cant give up stalingrad :^) pls die :^) but defend :^)

>>133265945
He lost

>>133265945
>German
>pagan
>terrible military leader
>his regime was based on the cult of the leader which is heresy according to the Catholic Church
>destroyed nationalism for years to come
>didn't kill a single Jew.
I hate the dude actually

>>133276560
You can't prove it without casualties but that need not result in annihilation or even necessitate the intent for it.

>>133276564
Yeah, it seems as if the actions later on during the years turned the tide against him.
I am aware of the whole Danzig situation. I would expect the Poles to be just as ultranationalist after such a treaty stripping land from them. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk lasted less than a year, but it was only through the efforts of the Reich that Versailles was undone.

>>133277124
>Bad behavior on one side will be repaid with bad behavior on the other.
But what's the point of war if not the highlight the eternal struggle between people? Fight to survive or perish entirely. If you are weak enough to allow the combatants to be destroyed, then the non-combatants will soon be killed, too. I don't see anything wrong with this. For example after 9/11, I would have seen nothing wrong if the US went into Afghanistan and completely decimated every person living there and made it American land. Conquer their people and land, make it yours. That is the spirit of war and it has been so for thousands of years.

>>133277582
Then explain how you intend to prove such a point, and if it is even worth mentioning, if you impose restrictions like "no women/no children" on yourself? The enemy must be destroyed and if you allow yourself the same civility they dismiss, then you will have your people destroyed and conquered. Then, they will either be taken slaves, outright killed, or, worst of all, forced to live on their knees in a shell of a nation occupied by the victors.

File: NICE JOB, RETARD.jpg (192KB, 568x771px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 568x771px

>>133265945
I can't follow a dead man retarded.

>>133278038

>Fight to survive or perish entirely.
Existential reasons have rarely been the case for war, at least between European nations in the last 500 or so years. Wars are typically fought for limited goals and either they're achieved or not. It could be argued that WWII was intended to be an war of annihilation, the Germans on the Soviet Union and the Allies on Germany. At any rate, only one ideology was intended to survive, either Bolshevism or National Socialism.

To compare how European-based nations conduct war to how third world savages do it is false equivalence. You could say that the reason that we fail in these places is because we don't repay the bad behavior of the locals.

>>133266572
its a good book to read if you want to understand what motivated Hitler and his view on things before the war

>>133279567
>Existential reasons have rarely been the case for war, at least between European nations in the last 500 or so years. Wars are typically fought for limited goals and either they're achieved or not.
More often than not, territorial wars or wars for some cultural motivation/to gain influence and power, sure.
>At any rate, only one ideology was intended to survive, either Bolshevism or National Socialism.
That was the struggle I was talking about. I don't really see anything wrong with mass murder of the enemy, honestly.

>To compare how European-based nations conduct war to how third world savages do it is false equivalence. You could say that the reason that we fail in these places is because we don't repay the bad behavior of the locals.
Exactly, if the US declared war on some random third-world shithole, it should be with the intention to dominate their people entirely. Remove them from the face of the Earth and conquer them through and through. Germans did this to Jews and the US/UK/USSR did it to the Germans.

>>133279601

If they read it, most people would be surprised by now much they would agree with parts of it.

Most translations suck which hurts the flow of the book. I've found the Ford translation to be the easiest to read English version.

File: 1499616578392.jpg (46KB, 626x623px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 626x623px

>>133265945
He didnt actually holocaust any jews :(

File: followyourleader2.png (80KB, 357x309px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 357x309px

>>133265945
He killed 60 million whites.

>>133265945

>Heap ridicule on our target to show everyone that you're a smart individual.

Always the same script with you people.

>>133280463
Did he kill them? Or did international Jewry push for this war and force them to defend themselves?
hmmm....

>>133278038
I want to be free from British rule, so i start a guerrilla war, not needing to involve civilians if only for the point, in order to prove that this annexation is not economically viable. Is the intent ever to annihilate anyone?

>>133265945
Absolutely no reason he should not have learned from Napoleon. NEVER invade Russia, NEVER EVER.

>>133281185
He was the one that declared war on USSR and the USA so yeah this is Hitler's fault

>>133281299
>I want to be free from British rule, so i start a guerrilla war, not needing to involve civilians if only for the point, in order to prove that this annexation is not economically viable. Is the intent ever to annihilate anyone?
You have to remove the British state first. You cannot co-exist with it if you wish to remove it. Immigration isn't an option, so civil war using guerrilla tactics is the option. My entire premise is that you will reach a point where the conquered Brits will be a liability, or, if you are losing and pushed in a corner, the notion of "human rights" falls apart really fast.
You want to annihilate the statesmen, yes. All those who oppose your goal will be destroyed, or they will destroy you.

>>133265945
He destroyed the Warsaw Museum which lost thousands of years of European history & caused the deaths of millions of Europeans.

>>133281395
Mongols did it successfully and they purposely invaded in winter so they could use frozen rivers as highways for their horses and use snow for limitless water. Invading Russia is fine you just actually have to be prepared and not be arrogantly retarded like Napoleon and Hitler. Hitler even refused to allow his Wehrmacht to prepare winter uniforms how retarded is that.

>>133279929

Wars over ideology were pretty much non-existent in Europe before the emergence of the Soviet Union. Look at WWI: There were absolutely no ideological differences between combatants. All were constitutional monarchies or republics to some degree or another.

Even the religious wars of the 16th and 17th century had some economic/political component. For the most part, in Europe, ethnicity was a non-sequitur, European nobility didn't really care who the ruled over as long as they ruled. It could be said that nationalism as a movement started with Martin Luther, but really didn't gain ground until the 19th century. So again, that's a relatively recent phenomenon.

The only other wars based on ideology prior to the emergence of Communism that I can think of were the Muslim conquests of the 8th and 9th centuries and those were certainly ideological. I somehow think it was successful partly because the people the set out to conquer didn't quite realize that. The goal of those were to convert who you could and annihilate, subjugate, or drive out who you couldn't.

>>133265945
He was a dumbass who put a brown-nosing wine salesman in charge of foreign relations, and put him in charge specifically of establishing an alliance with Britain, or at least keep good diplomatic relations, in order to avoid getting into a war with the Eternal Anglo.

But Ribbentrop fucked it all up like the bumbling retard he was.

>>133265945

He invaded Russia in Winter.
He declared war on the US
He Lost.

File: 1498984607158.png (103KB, 256x443px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 256x443px

>>133265945

His ideology, wich was very effective for morale of germany, had no place in warfare andhe should have let the generals just do their job. That is what stalin did after horfendous defeats and thats why the russians won.

>>133282122
If you're going to say Muslim conquests were ideological than so were all the christian ones. Charlemagne and the French were far more brutal in spreading Christianity in northern Europe than the Muslims ever were. Muslims didn't try to enforce religious conversions at this point but they expected jizya. Mediaeval Christians actively tried to eliminate non Christians. That's why 99.9% of Europe became Christian while the middle east was only 60-70% Muslim up until 2 generations ago.

>>133265945
He lost.

File: images.jpg (9KB, 181x279px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 181x279px

>>133266291
SPBP!

>>133267321
Islam saw its main turn unto darkness around the time Mohammed realised that there cannot be any compromising with Jews and partially is as notoriously fatalistic and urge-centered as it is specifically to not produce cultures that give the arch-enemy an opening to dilute Arab race consciousness. At the time Hitler even came into power it was already pretty clear that nothing would stop the Britshit Bank Cattle from genociding us as per Rabbi Sonnenfeld's orders, and so of course the boss saw promise in networking with people who had custom-built their culture specifically to fight the kike.

>>133265945
Seriously, why didn't he just surrender to the USA like Japan did? He could have done this before Russia took Berlin instead of just losing his sanity and killing himself.

>>133281921

Nobody launches a war without making certain assumptions about the strength of the enemy. Some people have this idiotic idea that Hitler woke up one morning and decided the invading the Soviet Union was a great idea.

As can be found by reading the Halder Diaries, The Germans did not go in blind, but made assumptions. It was apparent that Stalin was perhaps weeks, possibly days away from launching his own attack on Germany. The Germans made assumptions, educated guesses, what have you, and based their plan accordingly.

Unfortunately, most of those assumptions turned out to be wrong. They expected to face 170 divisions with their 150, a 1:1 match. After those were dealt with, it was believed that there was nothing between those and Moscow. But six weeks in, they had already identified 360 Soviet divisions. There was an entire second echelon of the Soviet attack that they had no idea existed. Ammunition expenditure was higher than expected. The roads were in worse condition than they realized. Casualties were higher, especially among officers, and there was a shortage of replacements. And so on.

File: IMG_3519.jpg (104KB, 677x995px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 677x995px

>>133283338
>unironically believing hitler killed himself

>>133265945
Too obsessed over doomsday devices

inb4 operation paperclip

>>133266291
>b-but 6 gorrillion

which one is it id/pol/?

>>133265945
attacked russia in the winter

File: 1494996810779.png (318KB, 500x520px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 500x520px

>>133266291
Spbp

>>133265945
He didn't finish the job and now the kikes are going to exterminate us.

>>133265945
He invaded Russia without any fucking winter clothes

>>133282621

Saying that Charlemagne was more brutal than the Muslims was ridiculous just by looking at the scale of things. At the time of Charlemagne, Europe was already mostly Christian, with a few holdouts like the Saxons. Charlemagne conquered and force converted a few Germanic tribes.

Compare that to the Muslim conquests: In the space of a hundred years after the death of Muhummad (piss be upon him), the Muslims conquered Byzantine Egypt, Zoroastrian Persia, Vandal North Africa, Visigoth Spain, some assorted Indian Kingdoms, which includes you, and were 200 miles from Paris. It's stupid to think this was all done with kindness.

>>133265945
Caused deaths of 60 million people for nothing.

>>133273983
>t. 12 year old arm-chair general.