As long as immigration levels aren't super high, why is

>leaf shitposting
enjoy your islam rape

because it destroys diversity and pulls everyone down to the level of the lowest common denominator.

>>133261596
Nice meme, but I am being serious.

File: Capture.png (330KB, 839x411px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 839x411px

Globalization is inevitable. You can't put a tariff on modernity. Embrace it, but on your own terms like Japan

>>133261493
For the 5688865th time.
It only helps the 1%. Look at your housing market for an example. Look in the archives if you want a better explanation, I'm not doing this every day.

>>133261493
It's not. Only mercantilian commies think otherwise

>>133261493
The loss of identity will create a rootless caste of "world citizens". Exchangeable drones stuck in high minded, impotent dreaming about whats best for humanity, instead of what happens in your own neighbourhood.

A shared identity created by globalism will be something that will be dumbed down to the lowest common denominator, ending up with all peoples being equally worthless.

Globalization =/= Globalism

>>133261493
Because civilization is good for your well-being.

>>133261493
>As long as immigration levels aren't super high
Sure, and rainbows will all have a pot of gold at the end of them, and there will be unicorns, and candy cane trees, and all of your colorful fanciful dreams too!
http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/german-town-of-100-must-take-1000-syrian-migrants/

>>133262252
>It only helps the 1%
How so?

Regular folks get access to a wider variety of goods and opportunities to study and work abroad.

>>133261493
It removes cultural and national identity in favor of some gray homogeneous blob

Culture dies, Globalization would only benefit if somehow Earth was inducted into some type of space federation and we could all be classified as Earthlings

>>133261493
Globalization has very little to do with immigration and basically no one conflated the two before the Syrian refugee crisis.

Read the Lexus and the Olive Tree if you want to see the globalists' perspective on globalization.

If you want to see the anti-globalist perspective on globalization, read about the Foxconn scandal and visit literally any town in the rural US.

They promised free trade, but imposed mandatory tariffs. They promised lower prices, but did it by lowering wages. They promised improved quality of life, but it's only affordable on credit.

Because governments fail to properly integrate immigrants to the society which they've moved into.

Europe is a perfect example of this.

>>133261493
You always regress to the mean.
The mean is not whites in white countries, it's backwards savages.

>>133261493
Third world countries will always outproduce first with slave labor.

We literally cannot compete, and thus should either tariff or sanction. The purpose of a country is to protect the people of THAT country, not the third world factory owners or international corporations.

i like the chinese view on the subject

globalism for everyone else, nationalism at home.

>>133263217
People become a resource, and are traded like cotton picking slaves. Want to pay less at megacorp? Move 100000 people into an area, then it's an employer's market. Want your shitty tiny houses to sell for millions? Move 100000 people into an area (like Canada) and housing prices are artificially inflated. These are basic economic principles. Look at Calais and the slums of Paris, tippy actually believe those people have "a wider access to goods and to study and work"? They don't even speak French, it's why their unemployed and living in slums.

Now you explain to me how it's good. Using objective facts, not your subjective garbage that you've posted.

File: winners-and-losers-jpeg.jpg (131KB, 704x337px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 704x337px

>>133261493
>>133262220

It's the current terms/method of globalization that is bad. Neoliberal globalization emphasizes that capital not labor be prioritized; so money can move about the world freely, while workers (whether in a factory or at an office) have shit low paying precarious jobs. Sure smart phones are cheaper, but rent, healthcare, and utility bills aren't.

Since most people are workers for money and not owners of money, they're feeling the short end of the stick in this race to the bottom for labor. This is what lead to the backlash against these policies in America and Western Europe.

>>133261493
kill yourself

>>133266580
This

>>133261493
why cant immigration levels be high? isnt it better for the country? like more work force right?