Do you think you're on the list? >Rex 84, short for

>>133185764
I don't see why I wouldn't be. I even have an FBI file.

>>133185947

storytime?

>>133185764
Compared to COINTELPRO and Operation CHAOS that's nothing.

On the other hand, that was right before Iran-Contra which was wildly illegal lulz. In a few decades we're going to find out the really bad shit the CIA got up to back then.

File: 1498016381311.gif (2MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x202px

>>133185764

>implying everyone who's posted on /pol/ at least once isn't already on multiple lists

>Possible reasons for such a roundup were reported to be widespread opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad, such as if the United States were to directly invade Central America.[1][2][3]

Unless you're a FARC supporting leftist, you're probably not on this list.
However, there probably is another list.

>>133185996
I din du nuffin. Just saying if I don't give a shit about knowing I'm on a list then you shouldn't be worried that you probably are as well.

I might or might not also work on a tiny part of the software that helps track you.

File: 128114-coles-supermarket-in-brisbane-st-ipswich-as-it-looked-during-the-floods-in-january-2011.jpg (40KB, 650x366px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 650x366px

Big deal, this literally happened in WWII to Japanese-American citizens. It is not outrageous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAfyFTzZDMM

>>133185764
I remember a thread on /k/ about this. An intelligence anon basically said they expect a few cities in the midwest to come under control of a Big Boss type.

>>133186504
>Even caring at this point

That list is so big you'd have the military rounding up thousands of their own

>>133185947
>I even have an FBI file.

you're not special everyone has an FBI file

>>133185764

No. I am the one who knocks.

File: 1478399977553.gif (2MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x250px

>1984

OP it was a list of commies to round up in case the cold war heated up, it's not 1984 and we hate commies

>>133187240
That's an assumption I agree with. But not everybody has been investigated. I didn't get indicted and I can still buy guns so obviously there are people worse off than myself, but I'm for sure on a list.

>>133185764
Im in krautistan so probably not

>>133187099
Nice, an outer haven

I know I am, but I've already been neutralized so I'm no longer a threat. And no - I'm not off my meds - but I do now suddenly have mysterious cancer. :(

>>133187416
sounds like you're the one that gets cozy and watches netflix while vaping

>>133187591
Maybe then, the government never throws away anything.

Now it's a list of anyone who has ever posted something along the lines of "I need my AR15 to defend myself if the government comes for my guns"

Like, do you think /pol/ are the only ones who plan for SHTF situations? The government has entire departments devoted to doing nothing but making sure they stay in control in a SHTF situation. Often, that will mean quickly shutting down anyone who might cause problems before they can.