You cant argue facts.
When does projecting on your child become child abuse?
>>133152548
I think their hearts are in the right place, but it's not like there's a 50/50 chance of your kid identifying as the colour Femé. Being straight is by far the most common sexuality.
>>133152748
Shouldn't a child be allowed to develop according to his gender without Liberal identity influence from his parents?
Who is this Paul guy I keep hearing about and why is he so racist?
>>133152548
When you personally decide what the child is and thinks, and brainwash your kid with bullshit, liberal ass-facts
>>133152548
Based James Woods
>mfw i just noticed the shirt this cuck is wearing
>>133152548
If my parents did this to me I would have shot them.
"I'm on the right side of history" is perhaps one of the most smug phrases known to man.
>>133157895
He's a whole other level of cuck. I have no word for it.
>>133157895
I would have done worse, im sadistic like that.
I jizzed myself at this one.
>>133156765
Same here.
Videodrome owns.
>>133155448
That's the idea
>Once you start digging you find that not all of Hollywood is fucking mental.
Schneider is red-pilled as fuck
Eats non GMO foods only
Hates CNN
Sees the Hollywood shills for what they are
>No longer does major films because of this, I assume.
>>133152748
It's not their kid, they adopted him to further their political agenda
Gays are mentally ill hedonists
>>133155448
Yeah, because most kids are straight.
>>133161163
I think they do think they have the kids best interests at heart. But I think the chances of them not being straight are low, so trying to bring them up as gender benders could damage the kid. However I think that the whole gender neutral childhood thing would make sense if like 20%+ of the population were trans. But it's nowhere near that.