>republicans want this why always be on the side of the

>>133038378
>Sees this
>Gets up off computer
>Ponders life
>Kills self

Is that what you want when 4 chan gets banned?

Most internet providers won't change shit because it'll piss people off famalam

>>133038930
like cable monopoly in the US?

they will change everything because you have no fucking choice but to pay them

>>133038378
I don't give a fuck, means it would kill most of the degenerate shit thats online.

God damn you idiots are retarded. What exactly is the beef with keeping FEDERAL REGULATION out of our glorious internets? If you honestly believe providers are gonna charge outrageous fees for everything then you are a child that doesn't understand how the free market works.

>>133038930
This isn't about the internet per-se, its about closing all the lanes for piracy and alternative media. THINK ABOUT WHAT CABLE DID TO THE MEDIA!?!? OF COURSE THEY WANT TO DO THE SAME TO THE INTERNET

File: 1490745670036.jpg (51KB, 704x523px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 704x523px

>>133039299
like this place and every other place that is not super politically correct.

>>133038378
I want porn banned.

>>133039389
>state backed and enforced oligopoly
>free market

>>133039491
>I lack self control

>>133039474
I would pay $10 for muh 4chinz. I wouldn't pay $10 for shit I don't visit, like plebbit,faceberg or jewtube

>>133039527
What's the problem if it helps virgins get laid?

It's literally means saving the white race.

File: DESU.jpg (38KB, 600x781px)

38KB, 600x781px

>>133039491
I want non-porn banned, checkmate atheists

>>133039205

>implying people watch cable anymore

>>133039657
You're part of the problem. You will get the rope when the time comes.

>>133039657
>I want to pay more money to the telecom monopoly jews
t. best goy.

>>133039737
white people suck in their own special way, the less of everyone, the better

>I want to ban shit I don't agree with
oh hi libtards!

>>133039389
Won't help if Comcast maintains a monopoly with help from the government

File: 1435997078052.jpg (71KB, 333x323px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 333x323px

>>133039745
This. Who the honest fuck watches television anymore?

Wouldnt a vpn prevent this?

>>133039205

>Paying for cable

Nigger are you fucking serious?

>>133038378
>reddit
I'd pay $10 to have it blocked, along with Twitter and Facebook.

>>133040320
congratulations, vpns illegal through something of something act of 2018 or whatever. It's really that simple

>>133038930

This.

The internet isn't a tangible asset until you start charging for bandwidth.

Cell phone companies did this.

Notice how they're now all unlimited data again.

Capitalism wins the day again.

>>133039491
Who cares what you want, Islamist faggot?

File: lefreemerchant.jpg (10KB, 207x244px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 207x244px

>>133039814
>>133039820

>>133038378
VPN

>>133038378
>Republicans want to destroy plebbit.
I always knew they were /ourparty/.

>>133040535
>t. Goon

>>133038378

this is not true. net neutrality is a corporatist meme.

>>133039205
AT&T tried banning 4chan like eight years ago and it blew up in their stupid fucking faces. They turned heel in like two weeks.

>>133038930
>naive the post

>>133041048

Jewbook is first in line to make deals with ISPs.

That kike Zuckerberg needs to be fucking gassed.

File: fuck dude.png (2MB, 1419x785px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1419x785px

Why do people assume this is a bad thing

Imagine how much smaller the total base of users would suddenly become

No more summer time Kids
Dumb fuck websites would get shutdown because they can't keep up their server costs since retards can no longer afford to pay for the internet

Elitism based on success

Like a country club

>>133038378
>americans now have to pay for accessing different websites and they are content with it

its not about the money you niggers

>paywalls Reddit
is Republican Party /ourguy/?

>>133039491
This.

>>133041530

Most of the faggots in this board wouldn't be able to afford it.

Parents, on the other hand, can afford it.

>>133041530
and then when a site has to answer to subscribers as if they were shareholders? You think it'll be easy to post race realist articles or steamy yuri when the majority of users vote with their dollars and quit paying?

it'll be as sanitized as cable tv

>>133041960

Look on the bottom of your screen.

Do you see ads?

>>133042054
no, why?

File: 10 shekels goy.jpg (17KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x300px

>>133038378
This will be the death of them. And I applaud it.

File: peterson.png (353KB, 1340x504px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1340x504px

>>133041960
I'd feel like it would be even an even higher occurrence of catering to that said audience

A large amount of ""'red-pilled""" people actually have a lot of disposable income
More then almost any other group I feel

>>133039491
Wouldn't be surprised if they charged a shit-ton for porn sites.

Those things clog up tons of bandwidth.

>>133038378
I'm unironically for locking Reddit behind a paywall. It'd kill that shitty site once and for all.

>>133041892
>hey mom can you buy my 4chan
>I want to mee mee on pol

When computers weren't so modernized and not that many people had internet, this place was still one of the biggest forums on the net

So you're fucking wrong in thinking that 4chan would be one of the places where someone couldn't afford their subscription

File: 1490052328845.png (460KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 800x600px

>>133042426
that sounds like a living hell

>paying money to go to Reddit
Lol

>>133038378
How come they haven't already done this? The Internet's existed for years without "net neutrality" with no problem, but all of a sudden it's a big deal, almost as if there's a secondary reason for it.

>>133042674
>The places where the biggest amount of money dictates what becomes law and fact on the net

Sounds pretty much like Capitalism Heaven

All of Mainstream Meator would instantly fall out of business since they can no longer hide behind bot views to their share holders

Instead it would have to be active user sub's

And What fucking retard would pay $10 dollars to view fucking CNN

>>133038930
>it'll piss people off famalam

The onwer of those companies have other means of getting money.

>>133038930

The vast majority of cable customers in the US are fucking retarded.

Time Warner started the trend a while pay of locking down wifi in routers/gateways that customers own and forcing them to pay to unlock it. Others are beginning to adopt it now.

If you think ISP's are benevolent and only looking to turn an honest buck then you're entirely ignorant about this matter.

>>133039205
>2017
>watching cable
Those companies got the point, too.

>>133042931
and content creators would move on down the road to the next free forum as they are usually paid rubbish or nothing for such deals. There are two kinds of people here; those using ideas and those generating ideas. The latter wouldn't have any part of it. Go look at the rich discussion on SA if you don't believe me

>>133042660
The internet was already huge by the time 4chan got here.

>>133042054
ADs only work on free platforms like radio, TV and the old utility style internet. Once websites traffic is cut off the owners will need to pander to their paying user base. You can see how answering to shareholders really cuts the quality of the product in video games and cable TV.
>>133042778
Its due to ad block and people ripping intellectual property online such as entertainment and various programs. Its fairly recent that the internet is used to pirate and its due to availability(free in many cases) combined with high speed and cheap storage devices. Its always about the money, they want it at any cost. Its no wonder Trump is anti net neutrality as a majority component of USAs money comes from intellectual property and the cable/retail/movie industries are failing.

>>133039745
what does that matter?
what do you use now? is it the internet?

>>133042660

>this place was still one of the biggest forums on the net
>So you're fucking wrong

Think about traffic stats and how popular premium channels are subscription based, then fucking kill yourself you idiot.

>>133043324
It went from 10% of world pop in 2003 to 50% of the world population in current year

10% is by no means
HUGE

>>133043443

>ADs only work on free platforms like radio, TV

Oh, I didn't know TV was free

Ah, I remember now. It's not. And it still has ads.

>>133038378
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eijq6fvppOI

>>133043581
>Equating TV to Internet

R e t a r d e d

>>133039389
Change your flag

>>133042515
And it's not like the internet is limited. If your consumers are clogging up your lines jerking it maybe it's time to invest in better server structure than charge people more money for the same service.

>>133043692
TV is free you just need to buy the converter. TV, Radio and internet are all free provided you have a device to connect to them.

>>133039518
>idiot that can't read

>>133043443
The fuck does an ISP care about you using Adblock for?

>>133038378
You do realize that Article 2 net neutrality wouldn't prevent this from happening, right?

File: Jacques-Pepin.jpg (590KB, 2048x1024px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 2048x1024px

>>133043945
this, 40+ HD channels and 3 PBS Create! networks. All the Jacques Pepin and This Old House I can fucking handle

>>133043945

Publicly broadcasted channels are besides the point - you wrote that free tv has ads - using that logic, non free tv has no ads. This is incorrect. Paid and free tv both have ads.

>>133041530
>uinironically defending internet restrictions
neck yourself

>>133039205
>a service available to the world is suddenly sectioned off in a land full of guns and a well-deserved sense of entitlement to view anything they want
Comcast HQ would be burned to the ground, and companies that are like 'hey I'm not gonna do any of that AND I'm going to charge less!' would eat up their business.

File: Bernie shekels.gif (4MB, 254x348px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 254x348px

Who cares? Redditors already pay money trying to be the Supreme Faggot, it's called r/SandersForPresident.

>>133038378
>pinterest extension
intense cringe

>>133038378

> not knowing this is about stopping netflix-like applications from hogging massive amounts of shared structural bandwitdh for free at the expense of literally everyone else

Mesh networking is the future not cable companies and centralized data providers you fucking mong. Net neutrality is a government power grab to censor the internet.

>>133038930
>companies never do stuff i don't like because muh free market

Imagine being this deluded, Sounds nice,

>>133044340
>being a low IQ poor faggot who hates the Free Market

Neck Yourself

I want all the phone posters OUTTA HERE

>>133044655
god, I hate Netflix. It basically rounds up the worst of TV and movies in one place

>>133044689
This. Article 2 specifies that common carriers are subject to the regulatory body. Little else. All this net neutrality propaganda is so full of shit and has nothing to do with the actual issue at hand.

>>133044737
Companies lose money by doing stupid shit like this.

>>133038378
How will this affect pron downloads? Specifically foreign porn like Japan.

File: XFINITY_r.png (25KB, 954x310px)

25KB, 954x310px

More like Comcast Fagfinity.. am I right?

Also, Comcast is the slimiest of the slime when it comes to ISP.

I recently switched to them and I host a home web domiain used to show to prospective employers (read: its not a business)

They block SMTP traffic to home email servers effectively breaking my email.

I read online, it says on their website: We block port 25 to stop spammers, but call us at this number and we will open it for you.

I call number.

They tell me they will open it; If I decide to triple my bill and upgrade to business class.

They have me under contract too.

they are slime.

>>133044689
This the EU has net neutrality and uses it to imprison political dissenters, fuck net neutrality.

File: 1475266088558.png (1MB, 732x943px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 732x943px

>>133044840
not as long as there are taxpayers, bailouts, and the government has a boner for/is behind whatever said company is trying to push

>>133044689
>Mesh networking is the future
THIS
THIS THIS

Decentralized mesh networks are where we will inevitably arrive at.

>>133045057
it's the interim I'm most worried about

>>133039205
then make localized mesh networks between a few houses, then bridge to a few more houses, then the whole area is on the same net, then neighboring area does the same, then the whole city is connected to an alternative network. with fast wifi routers and custom software it could be decently anonymous since theres no registered ip.

File: 6587.png (74KB, 190x146px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 190x146px

Anyone here taken the satellite TV pill? Free TV along with great programming.

>>133045038
Well it's a good thing that people that don't support net neutrality also don't support other forms of government intervention into the free market the , isn't it?

>>133044961
should've read the contract when you signed up, retard

t. tech support for comcast

I'm kinda happy that all the shitty people (leftists, lolberts) are buttmad about this

what's a good argument against net neutrality to trigger these faggots?

>>133038378

The left wants this:

>The website you are trying to visit has been flagged as unsafe and therefore it has been blocked.

>website *.4chan.org

>Flags

>White Supremacy
>Racism
>Fascism
>Alternate political views
>Right wing extremism
>Straight Porn
>Piracy
>Unregulated speech
>Hate speech
>Animated porn
>Alternative operating systems
>Crypto currencies
>DIY
>Alternative social media
>doxing
>click here to continue reading

>>133045238
a point made earlier is that it doesn't matter. The US government doesn't need supporters or dissenters. It's long since run off it's own steam. If they wanted to make the internet illegal tomorrow, there is little anyone could do (illegal to us, still free for the large companies that now rely on it). We are free to comment and protest only because it doesn't matter. The countries with free speech are only like that because it won't actually change anything

>>133045673
Then go blast them with your guns, fag. That's what they're for.

>>133044340
it's only restricted to those who can't pay. IF you can pay you get high speed and total acess to everything if you can't pay you get the shitty slow no acess demo version. IT's fucking great all the leftists and the poor and uneducated won't be able to afford it anymore. Leftist internet media and neet shit like the Daily Stormer will die off and only the patrician class will dominate the internet comments

>>133044840
>Companies lose money by doing stupid shit like this.
Is that why the bandwidth caps with exorbitant fees for extra bandwidth are coming back to north america?
Government sanctioned monopolies in the US mean that they can get away with so much shit it's unreal, people who claim
>le free market will fix it
are fucking stupid, the free market isn't perfect.

>>133044284
Ok lets put it this way. Theres stock radio,tv and theres basic cable and theres premium channels/cable or radio with no commercials. All designed to maximize profits and expand their user bases.

Now the internet is unique in that it cannot be controlled in the same way unless net neutrality is removed. A stock internet will be like tv and radio lacking information. Im not keen on relying on the table scraps of others when i can connect to the internet(for free in a hotspot) and access every bit of information myself known to man. Im not keen on allowing a governing body supported by lobbyists censoring the free flow of information so companies can make more money. The internet is free and should always be free.
>>133045020
Thats the problem of said country not net neutrality.

>>133045326
i did faggot.

They dont say anything about smtp traffic, they keep is so nebulous it could mean literally anything:
>WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO LIMIT OR BLOCK ANY SERVICE USAGE AS WE DEEM NECESSARY TO PREVENT HARM TO OUR NETWORK, FRAUD, OR OTHER ABUSE OF THE SERVICE(S).

this literally does not tell me they will be blocking SMTP to my server.

Also fucking kill yourself if you work for comcast.

Please, suicide bomb yourself in their building

>>133044585
>r/SandersForPresident
FML. Cancer can't be unseen.

"Let's be clear here. There has been a shift to the left in the general population, but none in the Democratic Party, thus, they lost."

>>133045950
>government causes bad thing
>removing government influence won't fix this

>>133046123
> government gets lobbied and paid off by a cartel of internet service providers

> plz stop gubernment!

> no

>>133045840
the guns are a token of the power we once possessed. Almost like giving a slave a dulled saw to cut his chains. No one body outside of the armed forces stands a chance, and they'll be able to spin peppering some street in Minnesota with a predator drone. Something about "continuation of liberty something something values" or some shit

>>133039657

You won't have the option to pay for 4chan. No provider will touch it with a stick.

>>133046290
>thinking the government would be able to carpet bomb it's own people without fear of being overthrown

>>133046669
good, about time this shithole got what was coming to it

>>133046290
I'm sure that would go over great in the current political climate. >>133046283
Both you fags seem to view the government as all powerful, if Eastern Europe went from gommies max censorship to having premium cheap fast and free internet then you can probably figure it out too.

>>133045960
Said countrys are using their new regulatory powers to do such things. So it seems giving the govt a tool they tend to abuse it.

>>133046123
>internet companies want thing removed
>this means it's for the good of their consumerbase
If there was a better option I'd take it, but as someone with the worst cable company in America as their ISP I'll take the gubbermint's very limited involvement for now.

>>133038378
So, Ancap internet?

File: 1485379214437.jpg (885KB, 1280x888px)

885KB, 1280x888px

>>133046762
>>133046808
can you honestly completely rule it out? doesn't it linger back there? For me, it's not a definite yes or no, more of "no, they can't do that... can they?"

and that is too much. That we could even entertain is proof enough that things are spiraling

>>133038378
>It's 2017 and I don't know how to hack Comcast because I'm a newfag.

>>133038378
>republicans want this

no they don't, fuck off.

>>133046768
4 chan might die due to people simply not using the base internet due its restrictions. Is that what you want?

>>133047212
of course it will die since 90% of the userbase won't have access anymore. The fucking horror, imagine the streets full of scared and confused faggots who are leaving the house for the first time

>>133044284
>free tv has ads
I can't watch a publicly broadcasted football game without seeing ads.

I also can't pay for a new baseball stadium with my tax dollars and watch it on a public broadcast.

>>133046969
Well actually you probably won't since luckily your president isn't as stupid as you.

>>133047048
If they did it would be worse for them than for you.

>>133047414
So this is how the west will be saved huh? Put a price tag back on information and knowledge. Remember encyclopedias? Remember going to the movies? Remember leaving the basement? Yeah it would work but at a cost to freedom.

>>133047414
>Trump makes the beta uprising real

>>133045238
>people that don't support net neutrality also don't support other forms of government intervention into the free market
You mean losers who only are allowed to "win" when it actually benefits their opposition? If losers like you push "deregulation" here and Comcast et al wind up fucking themselves in a bid to censor the Internet then you'll just lose when Comcast uses the government to unfuck itself. Which is what happens every single fucking time.

File: 1475027544320.png (974KB, 1000x1115px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 1000x1115px

>>133047714
look at like this, if it were a block in Ferguson, Missouri, then what would the response be? We wouldn't give a fuck. But there's the rub; now a precedent is set. A few years later, it's a cul-de-sac in an affluent suburb of Maine (maybe they have servers distributing e-mails they don't like). When we do eventually attempt to revolt, they'll first try to throw our own hypocrisy in our face.

"ya'll dindu shit when it was our people!"

then it's on The View and GMA in every waiting room in the country. People will be horrified, they may even protest, but they'll remember that they have to be to work because that iphone is not going to pay for itself and they need another ten-dollar gallon of milk. At that point it becomes normalized

>>133048038
>I don't trust the government to not iCal us over in favour of Comcast
>I trust the government to regulate the internet

>>133048542
If you honestly have such a low view of your own countrymen I'm surprised you haven't just become a hermit.

>>133048745
it'd be impossible to take measure of them without having to interact. You have to get your hands dirty to find the worms

>>133048023
Hmm i find it interesting how quiet the internet collective really is about appealing net neutrality. Maybe sub-consciously as a species we want to be free from the shackles of unlimited knowledge and entertainment and want to give others our time/money. Phone users will take their heads off their screen, basement dwellers will crawl out from their rooms into the shining sun, people will meet face to face and the west shall be saved.

File: 1450059683140.jpg (429KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 800x500px

>>133038378
>Libtards want more terrorist attacks
>Libtards want more socialism like Venezuela
>Libtards want more rapefugees

See, I can play this game too. Except I'm actually right and you just made up a fake image. You are fake news.

>>133047414
I mean, if it'll get people to grow up and get out of the basement.

File: 1465435244933.gif (291KB, 499x365px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 499x365px

>>133047633
>luckily you wont
Luckily for who? My ISP is already the only competition in the area. They have reintroduced bandwidth caps with a limited amount set 10years ago, my ISP is constantly hiking up prices and is the leading voice for why bandwidth caps are necessary for modern internet; flatout lying that it's a limited resource and you should have to pay extra for "more oreos"
There is no other competition and there never will be with how leasing of cable lines work, how will the free market fix this for my benefit?
Oh wait, it won't, because the free market isn't perfect and not everything fixes it self, NN should be expanded rather than abolished.

>>133044961
>We block port 25 to stop spammers
Ummm they are correct. Use a different port tardo

>>133039205
>cable
>paying for tv when you have internet
WEW

>>133049196
In good ol Poland we have an actual free market when in comes to ISPs, I use a company that just recently started up and offers really good prices. For a free market to work it has to number one actually be a free market (not you guys, I guess) and two, in a place with a decently smart population, so maybe not your town either.

>>133038930
Hi Comcast!

>>133039389
You are a child if you think that "the free market" works.

>>133039435
This.

File: 1476783006014.jpg (45KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1280x720px

>>133050195
but comrade, a true free market has never been tried!

>>133039745
does anyone seriously watch cable tv anymore under 30? only old people watch that shit because their too dumb to know how to use the internet.

>>133050352
>communist faggot
Imagine my shock.

File: 1452965230966.png (246KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 500x375px

>>133049957
>In good ol Poland we have an actual free market when in comes to ISPs
Oh, you mean your country that's a a fraction of the US's size so it's population is significantly more condensed and far less costly to lay down your own lines for a startup.
>For a free market to work it has to number one actually be a free market (not you guys, I guess)
Yes, this is why NN is needed, removing it won't fix anything with the current government regulations in place and will just fuck everyone outside of major cities.
>decently smart population
Intelligence has nothing to do with having no other options you illiterate monkey; The midwest for instance is dominated by 1 cable company who assfucks their consumerbase and is the most hated company in the country, frequent internet downtime not delivering the speeds they promise and a small bandwidth cap from a decade ago.
>but you can just get satellite!
For a large initial setup fee and 800ms/slow speed, sure.

Someone spoonfeed me about this shit
Why wont comcast fucking die

>>133038930
>Most internet providers won't change shit because it'll piss people off famalam

False. They have tried a bunch of times to do exactly this since 2009. They have even succeeded pulling this shit in canada and australia with search limits, search filtering and alloted GBs per month. The jew knows no bounds in their greed, the only boundary they seem to respect is when bullets start flying their way.

US is fucked and becoming more fucked by the year when speaking of internet freedoms. Comcast, Verizon and others hold a monopoly in my state where certain ISPs cannot operate. So I can't just "get" the cheaper option. Same as with gas, water and heating. Only one option.

These are literal monopolies our government refuses to take down.

>>133050755
it's worse! I voted democrat in the last four presidential elections

File: sweep-sweep.jpg (177KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 800x800px

>>133038378
There's only one way to deal with Jews.

>>133051015
Damn, that means you'd be at least 34. Surprised you've made it this long.

>>133050884
But Comcast hasn't done anything that net neutrality promises to prevent, it's just giving the government control over nothing.

File: Dorothy_0025g-Casualties-of-War-Toy-Soldiers-.jpg (33KB, 777x553px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 777x553px

>>133051235
close, 33

I started on what you would call the "right" side of this argument, but something about the white west began to disgust me. I eventually snapped and began pushing for a mongrelized, low-iq future for America. I think of it as a reclaiming of the land by nature. It's almost like a sci-fi novel where a faction emerges to help the invading aliens. If you people do take back your countries, I'm probly the first guy you want to shoot. Luckily, day of the rope NEVER! Especially now that kike boy is in office for hopefully eight years. He'll be sure to tie some hands in the name of god and country

File: 1496906159582.jpg (102KB, 600x471px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 600x471px

>>133051830
The company's name wasn't Comcast, It's hard to believe but Comcast is not most hated Cable company in America.
Just because ONE company didn't do this shit doesn't mean others didn't; removing it just opens up shittery again.
Of course those who've been affected by this shit want NN to exist, those who don't haven't experienced just how shit it is to have a terrible ISP.

>>133052179
>take back your countries
I already told you earlier that I'm Polish, my country hasn't been lost in the first place.

>>133043499
Oh no my internet provider is being a cunt guess I'll just go to one of the hundreds of others available in my state.

Fucking idiot

>>133052358
Your company isn't doing anything that NN will prevent, my earlier point still stands.

>>133052532
I've been curious about this. Is seems the same stigma that caused europe to kick you around for the whole of twentieth century has protected you from the embrace of suicidal multiculturalism

>>133043197
SA forums were great years ago. Low tax quit giving a shit and it became co opted by fat feminists and ban crazy mods.

>>133052673
>Your company isn't doing anything that NN will prevent, my earlier point still stands.
Maybe that has something to do with it currently being illegal to do it again, shit for brains.

>>133038378
Yup. That's literal brainwashing dystopia.

File: 1457160844433.jpg (11KB, 173x215px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 173x215px

>>133052658
thats convenient for you. there are only 2 available in my area aside from satellite and both are equally ass gouging and shit

>>133052808
It wasn't doing it before either.

>>133052774
Polish Nationalism first arose to revolt against people trying to destroy us in the 19th century, and looking back we can learn that multiculturalism did not do us any good in the commonwealth days.

>>133053060
>they're not doing it now
>because it's illegal
>w-well they weren't doing it before even though i probably still don't know who your isp is and even if I do i never heard of them until ten minutes ago
smart polack
intelligent polack

>>133053699
Were they charging you extra to access certain sites? If they were then I'm surprised I've never heard of them, that sound like big news.

>>133043443
>a majority component of USAs money comes from intellectual property and the cable/retail/movie industries are failing

THEN THEY NEED TO MAKE ORIGINAL CONTENT THAT'S NOT POLITICAL. WHAT HAPPENED TO FUNNY BEING FUNNY AND NOT A SNARKY REMARK AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE OR RIGHT WINGERS

>>133054139
>Were they charging you extra to access certain sites?
That's not the only thing NN prevents, most intelligent Polack, but the most popular example used to explain NN to retards.
ISP's have been doing shady shit such as throttling Netflix for years.
I'll state it again, you really think Cable companies want to get rid of NN for the peoples benefit?

>>133039657
you do realize you'll have to pay 50$ a month for the "Social Media" package right?

just like fucking cable.

>>133038378

What the internet providers want to do is charge netflix, hulu, and amazon prime for access to ISP customers, because they are bandwidth hogs, and because most ISP customers use these services more or less simultaneously, which puts massive strain on the infrastructure. Getting the video streaming services to chip in reduces pressure to institute customer side controls like bandwidth caps and throttling.

More importantly, ISPs don't give a single solitary fuck about text-centric websites like reddit or 4chan, because they use almost no bandwidth at all, unless you're botting.

>>133038378
>republicans want this because they didn't want a 90 page arbitrary rule which sought internet censorship and total control of the web
is this still salt about obama's fake net neutrality rule being stopped?

i love your salty tears, they will never stop

>>133048584
Currently the government allows us to use public spaces to hold neo-nazi rallies, because if they didn't we'd sue and win.

The government is at least tenuously bound by law, and it is against the law to censor the Internet if it is regulated as a utility and it is not against the law to make Comcast profitable independent of their actual business choices. "Trust" has nothing to do with it.

Your bullshit is Comcast getting what it wants right now and your loser faggot ass views that as "winning". When you don't want them getting bailed out later on Comcast is still going to get what it wants then too because libertatrians have zero fucking power and even less brains.

>>133055813
you obviously never read the rule trump repealed, which BTW was never in effect anyway

it was an SJW-filled nonsense thing which regulated nearly every aspect of online expression and discourse, totally filled with neologisms and buzzwords, giving unlimited power to the fcc to do whatever they want

if you want real net neutrality, get congress to pass a bill, ramming a retarded regulation up the backdoor isn't going to work

>>133040543
VPNs would never be illegal since so many companies and developers rely on them.

>>133039745
>>133040456
>>133043058
Are you people fucking dense? Cable companies provide the access to the internet. Unless you want Australia-tier satellite internet or live in one of the few cities that has Jewgle internet, you're getting fucked by a cable company. You have no choice. My area has Comcast and one other company whose max speed is like 5MB/s.

>>133038378
>Republicans.
It was Obama that gave China control of the registrar. Fuck off.

>>133056294
maybe they wouldnt be illegal but it would be easy to start requiring VPN's to log and report all activity to the Govt

>>133055991
>the rule trump repealed
This has nothing to do with what is being discussed.

It's amazing how none of this happened before "net neutrality" was officially codified back in 2015 (or 2016, whatever it was), and yet useful idiots still push this boogeyman.

>>133056638
Yes it does in fact, it's the current nexus of all 'net neutrality' whining. Drump repealed the magic rule remember?

You shills have such a short memory, especially when you're getting BTFO'd.

>>133056434
Thank Clinton for the broadband cable monopolies.

Anyway you're wrong, in most places you can choose cable, fiber, DSL, satellite, cell, and radio internet access these days.

Gaaaaay

>>133040617
No plans are truly unlimited,you get throttled after a set amount, usually 20GB

>>133040133
>>133050410
Well I do, to fall aslep.
But then I stream it over the internet, it's basically a livestream, but with normal TV.

>>133056434

If all you do is visit websites like Reddit or 4chan, why do you need 100Mbps?

And there is plenty of competition.

Cable
DSL (the incumbent provider, as well as CLECs who lease at wholesale and provide service on the ILECs lines)
FiOS if you're lucky
Satellite (multiple providers)
Cellular (multiple carriers, probably at least four in your area)
Increasingly more common is FTTH provided by local/regional businesses (electric coops and other non-conventional telecommunication companies, etc.)
Local/regional LoS wireless ISPs

They may not all offer speeds that allow you to torrent a Blu-Ray in 5 minutes, but 99% of people don't give a shit about that either. They just to be able to post to Facebook, watch funny cat videos on YouTube, stream some standard def NetFlix, etc. In which case nearly all the alternatives would work, and they could easily switch from their current provider if they tried to nickel and dime them with packages and other bullshit like that.

>>133056838
Then why are furiously opposing NN in the abstract on behalf of CNN's parent company? What do 'muh free markets' have dick all to do with the conversation?

>>133039741
kek

>>133038378
It seems to not be on their top priorities though. But, I must say, if this results in Google getting hit with a monopoly then in all for it. I can't stand Google, and they are killing any kind of competition on the internet. I'd do anything to split their company.

>>133057580
Whoa, you're getting off topic here kiddo!

The point is that OP's premise is false. ISPs are not going to charge to access sites. This whole net neutrality thing is just a fight between ISPs and nu-media streaming companies. It's not about passing packets unmolested, which I'd be all for.

test

>>133045189
> make localized mesh networks
This
if the internet companies try to jew the internet then mesh networks are the answer

>>133038378
Poor people shouldn't have access to things.

>>133041530
>only jidf paying to post
what a great idea

>>133057954
>like the jews wouldn't shit them up on purpose if they took off
this is how they operate

>>133038378
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Let's look at this dualistically in opposite extremes like this country has for as long as it's existed as it will continue until it doesn't.

You have small costs and big costs.
Fast traffic and slow traffic.
Public data and private data.

You do the math.

>>133038378
>Reddit
Go back OP.

>>133039474
>Reddit
>politically incorrect

>>133058352
I think that might have been worth 2 million dollars, but we'll see what the judges say.

>>133039745
>>133040133
Kida nice pirating all muh shows but yet having them be supported by ad watching tech illiterates