Can you logically justify Homosexuality without the """Love"""

>>132999377
You should ask /lgbt/ and it depends on which perspective you're looking at it. From a NatSoc perspective there is no justification for homos and they need to be taken out, if they can come up with any arguments for why they should be allowed to live they can try.
From a Libertarian or AnCap perspective it would be none of your business what other people do with their anal holes.

Homosexuality is a way to throttle populations when the population inordinately mixes with the environments ability to sustain the population. You see it in many animal species, once overpopulation occurs then the butt-fucking begins.

>>132999377
Yes, they reduce the population growth through simple lack of pregnancy and STD deaths. The world is becoming over populated and the majority of faggots are jigaboo's.

>>132999559
i'm not asking from a purely logical standpoint If that was not clear enough already.

It doesn't need justification, gay people always have and always will exist. You have no right to legislate who is allowed consenting adult relationships.

>>132999377
Ends feeble genetic lines?

>>132999377
For most of human history arranged marriages were a thing, even to this day out side of the west, marriage doesn't exist because of "love". It's contract before god and 2 familys to agree on the exchange of goods and inheritance. Not some meme about love and sheeeit.

>>132999749
>becoming over populated
we need to stop feeding africa if thats the case

>>132999817
Doesn't matter how you are asking, you should be asking /lgbt/.
You might as well be asking Buzzfeed why white ethnostates are ok. You are not going to get any reasonable answer because the people you are asking the question do not agree with the premise of it.

File: 1499377941577.jpg (16KB, 468x386px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 468x386px

>>132999993
Lack of suitable Imagery pertaining to the subject?

>>132999886
> "Murder-cannibalism doesn't need justification, murder cannibals always have and always will exist."
Stunning argument, you fag.

>>133000286
You obviously aren't looking for any explanation then what you already think. That's why these discussions lead no where, comparing two men in a relationship with murder is asinine.

>>132999377
it wasn't til way into my twenties I ever discovered that "same-sex attraction" was a treatable mental illness and I feel pretty pissed off.

don't fall for the porn jew.

>>132999572
Except we are not overpopulated. We are feeding more people with less farmland than ever before in human history.

>>132999886
>You have no right to legislate who is allowed consenting adult relationships.

Says who?

>>133000859
Homosexuality is a lifestyle based on death. It's actually a very fitting comparison.

They've been killing these people for ever and they are still around everywhere in the world.

Homosexuality is not going to magically disappear that's my opinion on the subject.

>>133001347
because it comes from nurture, not nature.

Here's the true homosexuality red-pill:

It's fine if it doesn't descend into degeneracy and it is hidden, Men historically used to fuck other men on the side but also had wives and like 6-7 children.

When it is "tolerated" and it becomes degeneracy then we have a problem

>>132999377
Muh freedom!

>>133001513
>When it is "tolerated" and it becomes degeneracy then we have a problem

We don't know how that's going to play out long term.

>>133001447
It comes from nature. Wasn't there a study done stating that even in homosexual men, the hypothalamus is larger in their brains?

>>132999377
Freedom of choice between consenting adults.