"Libertarians must be radical and uncompromising conser

>>132890859
Are you the owner of the resource Pastebin?

>>132890859
Also we have a good discussion going in >>132876164 atm.
Will link this thread at bump limit.

>>132892302
>>132892382

thanks for the info, man.

>>132892481
Are you the owner?

>>132892790
>>132894244

No, I don't think so... I didn't know that pastebins could have owners, but I am a constant lurker.

>>132890859
I just don't understand the mindset of the nuleft right now.

How can you be so fucking terrified of your federal government when somebody you don't want gets the power but think the issue is in the person and not the system?

What kind of mental gymnastics do you have to do to think that this was a fluke?

>>132890859
What the fuck is this article
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/12/philip-pilkington-the-austrian-disease-poor-scholarship-a-priori-bias.html

>>132898452

Because they are emotionally based.

I got a bunch of Jesuits to convert to Natcap. Secure borders and Capitalism seems to advertise well.

File: 1485132858362.jpg (106KB, 574x500px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 574x500px

>>132890859
Ancap is alright but I hate all the redditfucks you guys attract.

>>132902870
Know that while AnCapism means well and is certainly preferable to statism but is utterly inferior to Laissez-faire Capitalism. LfCap>AnCap for the same reason Minarchism>Anarchism. And that is because objective law>polycentric law. Read a little of this lexicon to discover why http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/anarchism.html

File: Freiheitliche Deutsche Arbeiterpartei.png (53KB, 2000x1464px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 2000x1464px

>>132890859
That's a neat-looking flag. Did you crib it from this?

Right>Left
Capitalism>Socialism
NatCap>NatSoc
NatSoc=GloSoc
Meritocracy>Democracy
Libertarian>Authoritarian
Libertarianism>Egalitarianism
Objectivism>Libertarianism
Objectivism>Subjectivism/Relativism
Egoism>Altruism
Individualism>Collectivism
Individualism>Statism
Nationalism>Globalism
Anarchism>Totalitarianism
Minarchism>Anarchism
LfCap>AnCap
Conservative>Progressive
Liberal>Fascist

Missing anything?

>>132902870

Sadly, the redditors were coming here anyway due to the election. At least this makes their brain work as opposed to multicultural civic-nationalism.

People can take individualism too far in this sphere and often neglect social technology too much (marriage, patriarchy, family structure), but in many ways this more recent ancap/natcap trend is actually harder right than the lolbertarianism that always made up a substantial portion of old/pol/.

>>132903284
I definitely know what you mean. What I was referring to was that reddit users frequently use Ancap to falseflag d/c against the NatSoc groups here.

>>132903436

Congratulations on your degeneate brown 85 IQ land of empowered womyn, try to get inside before nightfall

File: índ.jpg (10KB, 238x212px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 238x212px

>tfw we never had a pinochet

>>132903436
>Minarchism>Anarchism
no.

>>132903436
>Right>Left
>Capitalism>Socialism
>Libertarianism>Egalitarianism
>Egoism>Altruism
>Individualism>Collectivism
>Anarchism>Totalitarianism
>Minarchism>Anarchism
>Liberal>Fascist

>Missing anything?

Your list is missing
chosen>goy

File: TRoF.png (53KB, 1319x444px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1319x444px

>>132890859

>>132903734
Start teaching kids more about that hero in schools. Force your children to lurk Natcap threads.

File: tfw to intelligent too not be a cuck.jpg (7KB, 208x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 208x250px

>>132904849

>your children

anon ... I ,,. you just trust too much on /pol/'s capacity

>>132903436
NatSoc >>>>>>>>>>>> NatCap
Libertarian > Authoritarian
Libertarianism > Egalitarianism
Egoism > Altruism
Individualism > Collectivism
Nationalism > Globalism
Anarchism > Else
Literal Dogshit >>>>>>>>>>> NatCap

I deleted the comparisons that were retarded or too broad. The way you fucks throw around non-ideological phrases but incredibly broad like "socialism" and capitalism as if they're boxers fighting each other is retarded

>>132903360
No, actually. The 7 sided star is actually a bastion fort, symbolizing the defensive nature of negative rights. The text was inspired by Fiats logo.

File: 18447272_1460004984037832_7565152753888222545_n.jpg (30KB, 441x480px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 441x480px

Save your head, get out of the red.

>>132905260
>Literal Dogshit >>>>>>>>>>> NatCap
I expected nothing different from a piss throwing ancom.

File: 1486558970392.jpg (81KB, 1024x508px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1024x508px

didn't know styx was so based

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrIiRz9jcrc

File: Culture_Of_Critique_xxv.png (52KB, 746x204px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 746x204px

>>132904278
I agree with this screenshot but it's worded pretty badly. The right of force is generally just called freedom or personal liberty. Also philanthropy is obviously compatible with the free market as we've seen historically.

I would argue that ancapism is far less individualistic than people realize. In the absence of the state, your only safety net is your personal relationships. Your strongest personal relationships are your familial, tribal, or religious relationships, so these become much stronger than they can ever be under statism.
>pic related

Personal philanthropy works much better in the absence of the state. Under ancapism, if you want welfare, you have to ask for it from your family, friends, or your church. This means you must present yourself as someone worthy of welfare. If you are able to work but you're unwilling, the people who are actually in a position to figure this out are your close associates, not the state. There are no freeloaders. Charity often takes the form of zero-interest loans. There will be more money left over who are legitimately unable to work.

The presence of the state philanthropy also eliminates the market forces that historically gave rise to private mutualist "friendly societies" and fraternal orders.

>>132908605
>There will be more money left over *for those* who are legitimately unable to work.

>>132895449
>>132892790
>>132892302
I am. What do you need?

>>132890859
Add the subject next time you make this general, helps people to find it.

>>132910320

I will, sorry about that. I'm on my mobile

File: 1489715813327.png (249KB, 466x660px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 466x660px

>>132910320
Just wanted to ask that you add a mention of "Objectivism" It deserves a mention in the OP as it encapsulates Nationalism, Capitalism, Meritocracy, Individualism, and Libertarianism all rolled into one. And because a rejection of the evil of Altruism is sorely lacking in all other liberty-esque philosophies. Metaphysics and epistemology are sorely lacking in the OP and Objectivism provides them.
"Libertarian" is only useful as a technical qualifier and is basically incomplete Objectivism. Objectivism without the epistemology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erytcpYpzRk

Objectivism is far to specific for it's own general however and the amount of generals on /pol/ are starting to reach /mlp/ cancer levels.
There should be more resources from Libertarians there too, not just Ayn Rand.

I'd simply put John Galt's speech (BTFOs commies and NatSocs in equal measure) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F5nhYo5nx4
This interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F5nhYo5nx4
and something about Altruism: http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/altruism.html

Am I the only one who hates the term "anarcho-capitalist"?

>>132916534
No, there are better terms to use. "anarcho-capitalist" to most people means "the current system but we abolish the government overnight" - not to mention anarchy and capitalism are two 'bads' in the mind of most people.

>>132917172
I would like to add that anarchy and capitalism are not the end goals of ancaps; the goal is the restoration of property rights. Anarchy and Capitalism result from property rights, but they're not the center of the ideology.

>>132917453
They're linked, I suppose. With property rights comes the fact that all human interaction should be voluntary, and since the state is a coercive entity, and capitalism is a system of voluntary exchange, you must by definition have those two to live in a truly free society.

>>132916534
No

>>132916534
No. Also hate it. You cant maintain libertarian values without the state to apply anti trust action against subversive business interests