IS THIS WHERE ARE THE INBRED WHITE TRASH HANG OUT? WE EVOLVE

>>132737875
No shit that shitskins benefit from breeding with us. Meanwhile our bloodline is ruined

The two most destitute places in the US, West virginia and kentucky, are 95 and 90% white, respectively, but this is mostly because of unchecked conservatism as opposed to whiteness.

File: pol power.png (166KB, 1178x940px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1178x940px

>>132737875
>just learning about this place
wew

>>132737875
Have enough mixed-race people been IQ tested and compared against the non-mixed racial IQ scores?

I'm guessing the mixed would lie in between the two races that conceived them (could be wrong but it seems reasonable, given that with a large enough sample size it would simply equate to the average of the two parent races).

Heuristically I'm getting the sense that it all depends on the combination of races. For instance, if a sub-saharan african mates with an east asian then that child will probably be much smarter than your average sub-saharan african; however it will be much less intelligent than your average east asian. So good for the africans but bad for the asians. Same with whites and blacks. So essentially if you're a white person then it will be bad for your child if you mate with a less intelligent race. BUT WHO CARES ABOUT THE INTERESTS OF WHITES RIGHT?!

Once again this is simply an anti-white thing. It's eugenics (which the left is supposedly against) but purely for the benefit of non-whites and purely to the detriment of whites, so they advocate for it. The left is anti-white, nothing more, nothing less.