>>132699865
6,7 and 9

>>132699865
2,4,7

File: 11138087_10153266977853481_975147449136529543_n.jpg (106KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 720x960px

These three

1, 8, 9

Dream Team

>>132700115
/thread

Tucker Carlson
Charles Murray
Douglas Murray
Or bust. They're the only right-wing intellectuals who touch on issues that matter.

7, 7, 7

>>132699865
Ben is a dirty kike, but his debate skills are undoubtedly excellent. 9,2,4

1, 8 and 9

Isn't it funny that the best thinkers/debaters on the right are non-white?

Really makes me think.

>>132699865
3/4/6

Milo is a must because just the sight of him sends lefties into a shit fit.
Rand is a cuck but liberty makes a great middle ground talking point.
Hannity is on the highway to redpill and a great speaker.

1, 7, 9

>>132700467
this

>>132699865
who the fuck is #1?

File: IMG_0502.jpg (17KB, 227x226px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 227x226px

Ben, Mark, Rand.

It's all about fiscal conservatism

File: 1499230967450.png (190KB, 270x324px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 270x324px

>>132699865
2,2,2

Rand, Tucker and Shapiro

>>132699865
6, 7, 9.

>>132699865
1,4,9

>>132699865
All I need is 2.

>>132699865
>2: Wildcard
>5: Overall good choice
>7: Experience in debating

>>132699865

Only 7 has any value from among these people, it's a terrible graphic. 1 and 8 in particular are an embarrassment for anyone to be associated with,m.

>>132699865
1,4,9 though Rand is kinda a solo player

9) It's literally cheating to have just 9 on your side.

>>132700281
Yup.
>>132700447
You're retarded. They're definitely white. But it wouldn't really matter anyway.

Ravi Zacharias will debate the pants off anybody, he should be on that list.

>>132700539
Dinesh D'Souza

File: felinegroovy.jpg (20KB, 349x311px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 349x311px

Picking youtubers over Mark Steyn, for shame.

File: 1498010844353.jpg (78KB, 669x696px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 669x696px

>>132700669

>5
>good choice
PJW is only good at editing a presenting a prepared arguement via youtube, I'd bet he'd get btfo in a unscripted debate like Lauren.

>>132699865
>(((Liberal))) """humor"""
4 and 7. Rand doesn't seem to sharp but that's a bonus. He takes people off guard very easily. Tucker is very articulate and together, they could take anyone down. Tucker and Rand are both smart, quick, and have snarky senses of humor but don't get too invested into the act, while debating as well - which is essential to unbalancing your opponent. All the other snarky bastards on the list get too heavily invested and are countered too hard.

File: 1495953775021.jpg (97KB, 800x788px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 800x788px

>>132700669
2. Wildcard muhahaha

1776 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN IF YOU TRY TO TAKE OUR FIREARMS!

>>132700628
you can't do 6 and 9. 9 will refuse or get into fights with 6

>>132700539
Dinesh D'Souza

>>132700115
>>132700338

>>132700007
Kike

>>132700994
Well i am terribly sorry for picking the winning team.

PS. Go fuck yourself.

>>132699865
7, 8, 9 is the correct answer.
Kikes can argue

>>132699865
1 2 3 maybe sub 1 for 7 but the rest are memes and Rand Paul

Gotta love Alex Jones as the wild card

Where is Andrew Breitbart? I would add him to the list.

Alex Jones is a total wildcard here, but he is smarter than most people will ever give him credit for being.

Tucker is a straight shooter, he is damn good, but I think Hannity is a little better at debating.

>>132699865
2 for brute force overwhelming of weak opponents
7 for bantz and harsh but fair arguments that leave no room for bullshit
9 just for debate experience

>>132700630
This

>>132699865
4 6 9

>>132699865
>no Trey Gowdy

fuck this shit

Hannity to soak damage, taunt, and free retaliate when attacked.

Tucker to nuke any low-HP units that get within range of the party.

Last member is tough, I'd like to take Milo for debuff on enemies but after his nerf it's too much of a risk. Guess I'll go with Rand to provide Liberty buff to party and the % chance to make enemies agree with him.

>>132699865
> No Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor, Stefan Molyneux or David Duke

Castrate yourself.

>>132700007
>>132700281
>>132700447
>>132700407
>>132700467
>>132700628
>>132700630
>>132700792
>>132700796
>>132701102
>>132701245
>>132701352

Shapiro has no charisma

>leaving out Molymeme
I pick Stefan

>>132701448
But he can debate like a motherfucker

>>132699865
tucker and 4 argues while i fuck millo in the ass

>>132699865
>no Trey
>no Nige
garbage

How bad is Cenk going to get raped by Shapiro at Politcon tho?

Also, 1,8,9 is '92 Dream Team.

>>132700115
Yeah, if I got pick any it be these, may switch alex out for hannity. Depends on the kind of lefty.

>>132701448
he seems likable to me

what's your problem with him?

>>132699865
Those are all media celebs faggot. Maybe you guys don't understand the difference between reporters and intellectuals but we do! Pol hates most of those people any way.

>>132701448
Yeah he does. Have you ever seen him lose composure?

>>132699865
Lists like this show how basic bitch most right wingers are. Go a little deeper you fucks.

Only decent one on that list is Levin.

>>132701448
Shapiro is unstoppable. I would forfeit my other 2 options just to have some mercy on my opponent.

>>132699865
all I need is 2, rand and tucker

Shapiro is smart kike, who's able to remain calm and make witty remarks at tbe same time. He's a must.

PJW is the best one at creating a narration of facts.

Yiannopolous for triggering purposes. He's a flamboyant faggot and that alone eliminates the ''sexist, homophobe'' card. He fucks niggers and that eliminates the ''racist'' card. If libtards can't scream ''racist and sexist'' they lose 90% of their effectiveness already. Then you send in the other two for the counter argument and close for the kill.

GG

What's even better is that those guys are in their early 30s, meaning they'll stick around for 3 decades, while the best libtards have for the future are obnoxious SJWs.

>>132701541
>>132701581
>>132701611
he comes across like a know it all nerd if you want to win over an audience you have to have more charisma than raw debate skills

>>132699865
y-you leave milo out of this

>>132699865
Liz Wheeler, backed up by Milo & Levin. Frick the rest.

File: 1497453891786.jpg (118KB, 758x878px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 758x878px

>>132701448

He's a jew and I still think he's a faggot for attacking Trump for the apparent "assault" that happened to a reporter, but I can't deny his debating skills.

>>132701448
I didn't say anything about charisma, retard, Jones has plenty to make up for it. And I'd argue that you're not even correct, he seems to keep his composure extremely well, and can usually offer up more than respectable rebuttals to almost all comebacks.

>>132701541
This

>>132699865
9 is pretty much automatic. I say 1,6,9.

>>132701695
He's absolutely stoppable. He debates fucking idiots and he relies on rhetoric far more than reason. Let him get challenged by actual challengers to his right.

Every time Shapiro says "Gang" on his podcast I Seig Hiel

>>132701714
So, because he knows a lot of stuff he is not suitable for a debate?

get the fuck outta here.

File: 1498670398080.png (2MB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x900px

>>132699865
I'll see your intellectuals, and raise you one lying nigger. Pic related to the lying nigger part...

Rand and Shapiro. If it's required that we accept three people for the team, then either Watson or gay boy.

>>132701850
>>132701611
charisma and composure are two completely different things without charisma the audience will never listen to you no matter how smart you are

>>132699865
He may be a kike, but Levin is smart and has written multiple books on economics. He'd make the average college hipster lefty genuflect and reject Marxism out of shame.

If they're Ashkenazi, theyre in. That species of Jew is 100% word voodoo motherfuckers. They will make you deny your own existence if youre not wise to their verbal trickery

>>132701910
he still has a shit personality that comes across like nails on chalkboard

>>132701389
You forgot that Rand also dispells debt curses.

>>132699865
Just pick the three Jews and bribe them with shiny.

6-8-9

459... the rest are absolutely fucking retarded. i can confidently say that i can outwit anyone who isn't 459

>>132701562
1,8,9 is godly

1,9 + anyone else will also win

>>132701821
Liz Wheeler is a pro-life Tomi Lahren knockoff

>>132702098
This is a debate we are talking about, not the fucking election.

Remember that.

>>132702146
Levin is smarter than PJW and Shapiro. I can guarantee your confidence is misplaced.

File: IMG_2210.jpg (106KB, 659x824px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 659x824px

>Not including Ted "the Zodiac" Cruz

if my goal is winning, 4, 7 and 9

>>132699865
1,4, 9

>>132702255
Ted spits hot fire on twatter and has good rants, but his speech pattern annoys me

>>132700115
That's right. I chose these so quickly, wasn't even an internal debate

File: rightwing'intellectuals'.jpg (155KB, 675x1200px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 675x1200px

>>132699865
>Steve Bannon

File: spengler_large.jpg (279KB, 856x1035px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 856x1035px

>>132699865
>Fox News hacks and alt-lite faggots
>right wing
Pick one faggot

>>132699865
4,7,9 for ferocious victory
2,6,7 for lulz and still victory

>>132702237
This. Levin is Shaprio with less flamboyance and 30 years experience.

>>132701618
Balls deep in Rediscovering Americanism rn.

File: 12345363423322.jpg (59KB, 535x599px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 535x599px

>>132699865
Nice trick Ben sheepiro...
You are a never Trumper...
You backstabbing cunt

File: 1488658968571.jpg (99KB, 763x496px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 763x496px

>>132699865

8 is all you need.

Where is based Savo btw???

>>132699865
4, 8, 9

Easy

>>132699865
I know he is a nigger but where is Thomas sowell

>>132702526
Cool, but post the original

>>132702526
Levin is fully on the trump train now tho. Way more than shapiro is.

>>132702209
She does her homework like nobody's business and is sharp. Most talking heads aren't in her league, IMO. (Don't know who Tomi is.)

Tucker, Rand, Ben. All the rest are stupid fags.

File: 1479370384452.jpg (102KB, 822x1024px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 822x1024px

>>132699865
Alex Jones and two of his clones

>>132702560
Savage is better than all the peeps in OP's pic, desu. He's an actual nationalist and he's not afraid of shitting on big corporation that sell-out to globalism, like Jewgle.

All you need is the based Jew and you already won

I think I'm going straight down the left side.

1 4 7

>>132702672
She's the chick that Glen Beck fired for being pro abortion. She hot af ftr.

>>132702512
But not quite the composure

>>132702758
Bugle sold out? I love those chips.

>>132701448
He is a nerdy Jew boy that can enter into the Leftist territory and crush them from within with his master-debater skills.

He is Right wing but maintains his Jewness by being 100% unstoppable.

I would ask you to listen to him debate but you're probably like every Leftist that instantly judges people on their appearance.

>>132701102
This, but Tucker isn't a Heeb.

Ben, rand and dinesh

>>132702255
Ted is a christcuck

>>132700115
Ditto

>>132702850
His fucking rants are incredible like When he starts freaking out and screaming about convention of states. Shaprio def has more composure.

Can someone make a leftist version of this? I would like to see the choices there.

File: 1484274435044.jpg (78KB, 823x1024px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 823x1024px

>>132702758
>better than all the peeps in OP's pic,

I think he's lose his shit very quickly in a debate though.

>YOU LOW LIFE VERMIN!!! WHO ARE YOU?? YOU ABSOLUTE NOTHING YOU!!

That kind of thing after about 5 mins. I'd still put him on the team just for the drama.

File: 1499398980698.jpg (88KB, 540x608px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 540x608px

>>132699865
Rand Paul, Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro. Without a doubt.

They're all fiercely intelligent, and very experienced at arguing rationally against people that disagree with them. They would certainly be the most likely to win over moderate people in any debate with leftists (and winning over the moderates is the only way to win a debate).

Alex Jones, Hannity, PJW and Milo all suffer from the same problem - they merely preach to the converted. They don't have the patience for really engaging with their opponents' arguments - they've already decided they don't care about them. This doesn't win over moderates in a debate.

And I don't know who 1 and 8 are.

>>132699865
2 for ferocity, 7 for winning, 9 for robotic fact dispersion

>>132700281
>1, 8, 9
anything else is retarded and wrong and you should be embarrassed of yourself

>>132703090
Leftist don't debate ideas. They attack character. There is no list.

>>132703090
The choices are all "Losers who will call the other side names"

2, 5, and 6
Just to piss them off

File: 1498851149964.jpg (44KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x667px

Water Filter Merchant.
Happy (gay) Merchant.
Manlet Merchant.

$$$

>>132703090
Doesn't matter, their modern """ideas"""" are indefensible.

>>132703068
Might be able to double as slight wildcard so you don't have to go all in with AJ

>>132699865
2, 3, 7

Any other choice is incorrect

>>132702526

Levin regularly goes after the NeverTrumpers.

>>132699865
3 4 7

>>132703218
Yeah, but I want to see the top choices, just for laughs.

>>132703195
i'd replace ben for stefan tho

File: thumb-1920-701401.jpg (141KB, 1920x1095px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1920x1095px

>>132699865

I'll pick 1, 6 and 9 for gas chamber.

Needs more Jared Taylor

>>132699865
Milo, Tucker, and Ben.
Would replace Tucker with Thomas Sowell if I could.

But with my current team here's how I expect it to go down.
Milo starts off and gets them flustered.
Tucker comes in briefly to sound moderate for a moment and makes his tucker face when the lefty can't restrain themselves from being triggered by the gay man.
Tucker then dips out for the rest of the argument while making his tucker face at anything the lefty says.
Shapiro uses his superior jew mind tricks to clean up.
I wouldn't need to say a word.

File: IMG_0635.jpg (132KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x720px

>>132703385

>>132699865
Wrong that's middle and low brow intellectuals. Try NRO, Claremont, American Affairs, Weekly Standard, Commentary, and American Greatness oh and the think tanks Hoover, AEI, Heritage (meh).... Strauss

/pol/ is the gateway

>>132703329
His podcast has so many fucking commercials. I'm constantly having to fast forward. Fuck his Helix sleep foam mattress.

File: 1381969791406.jpg (11KB, 179x193px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 179x193px

>>132699865
2 for crazy
7 for laughs
9 to hide behind shield of anti-semitism

Which ones are debaters? All I see is over opinionated air heads

File: IMG_2852.png (414KB, 600x453px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 600x453px

>>132699865

I discard all my cards to play all 5 pieces of Ted-xodia.

>>132699865
3, 7, 2.
Wisdom, Courage, Power.

>>132699865
I guess it depends on context, but generally I'd choose the boy-kike Shapiro because he seems to be able to quote studies with autistic accuracy and is legitimately a good debater.

I'd take D'Souza (sp?) because he's actually a decent debater but more importantly it gives me a token minority to avoid claims of racism.

Finally, I'd take Tucker mostly to be the face of the debate, because he's a master of making people look idiotic just by looking at them with that face he makes.

>>132701430
Richard Spencer has no debate experience at all. He'd get destroyed. Dumb Nazilarpfag.

I'd like NYT best selling author Michael J. Knowles added please. His last work of literature was a timeless classic.

>>132699865

3,4,9

Hannity to irritate them and throw them off their game. Shapiro to go in for the kill. Rand to make sure Shapiro doesn't jew me.

>>132701389
This

>>132699865
1 9 and 8.

>>132699865
https://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/
https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/
http://www.socialmatter.net/
http://antidem.wordpress.com
https://citadelfoundations.wordpress.com/

179 easy

>>132699865

Three Alex Joneses.

4 7 8

>>132699865

3,7,9

All seriousness, no 3 leftists would be able to stand up to that onslaught of logic and pinpoint debate accuracy. I guarantee you every other word from the left side would be "racist" or "islamaphobic" in an attempt to hide that they have nothing of substance.

>>132703188
Although I'd like to add, Tucker and Shapiro are my most certain choices. Rand Paul is a bit less certain, because I think he can seem a bit niche to some people. But I still stand by my three choices, because I think they're the most capable right-wing debaters out of that selection.

The next closest candidate would be Hannity, because I think Hannity is actually quite intelligent and quite reasonable, if he wants to be. So if I was allowed a "sub", then it would probably be Hannity.

I think PJW certainly has the potential to be a good debater - I think he has the intelligence for it. But he just lacks that experience of going head-to-head with opponents. He only ever talks to a camera. So I think he could easily be caught off-guard in a debate. Being experienced at public speaking, and being able to maintain your composure, is important.

Milo is just shit at arguing. Sorry, he is. He only cares about being a diva. He is bad at responding reasonably to arguments made against him - instead he just looks for ways to personally attack his opponents. It's not a good look. I think he's intelligent enough to be a good debater, but it would require him to be more reasonable.

And Alex Jones - man I love the guy for entertainment value. But in a debate, he's not going to win over any moderates. Not by a fucking long shot. Unless they happen to be very interested in water filters.

>>132699865
Dinesh Tucker Shapiro
Best team is best team

>>132699865
Michael savage, you political elitist cunt

Who will win when Cenk from TYT and Shaprio debate? I've got Shaprio in a landslide. I think Conor has a better chance of KOing Mayweather than Cenk winning.

File: 1497834565531.png (7KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 420x420px

>>132703090
>Can someone make a leftist version of this? I would like to see the choices there.

1. Michael Moore - Dinesh
2. Rachel Maddow - Alex
3. Jake Tapper - Hannity
4. Elizabeth Warren - Rand
5. Sally Kohn - PJW
6. Lena Dunham - Milo
7. Colbert - Tucker
8. Van Jones - Levin
9. Wolf Blitzer - Shapiro

>>132699865
6, 7, 9 would have the best charisma >>132700007

2, 6, 9

Literal meme team

>>132704426
Well fuckig done

File: Globalists+your+days+are+through_6c93df_6079750[1].jpg (198KB, 900x1121px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 900x1121px

>>132699865
2,2, and 2

>>132704426
Not bad, not bad. Megyn Kelly needs to be in there somewhere, though.

File: 1499056409262.jpg (126KB, 1024x953px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1024x953px

>>132704426
>9. Wolf Blitzer - Shapiro

maybe switch Wolf for Cenk??

>>132699865
>Ben
>Rand
>Tucker

There is no other choice.

>>132704426
A1 post

>>132699865
1, 7 and 9.

>>132704426

In order of least evil to most evil
+Mark Cuckerburg
+Bernie Sanders
+Mao Za Dong
+Stalin
+George Soros
+Hillary

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2479x3764px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2479x3764px

>>132699865
2 and 4

>>132699865
9,7 and 5 in that order

File: IMG_1662.png (3MB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1242x2208px

Milo would be good because he upsets so many people. He has Jihadi strippers at his book release party rn on periscope.

>>132699865

Alex, Milo, and an off the board pick, Sam Hyde. Going to be a good time

File: 1486420302001.jpg (89KB, 625x415px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 625x415px

>>132699865

I like only Tucker.

>>132703188
8 is (((Mark Levin))). Like someone said earlier, he is Shapiro +30 years. Just as lawyerly and Jewey, with more grounding in the philosophy of the founding principles of the American Republic (though he conveniently omits the White Ethnonationalist aspect).

>>132699865
7 to wear the leftie out by going in circles
6 to trigger the leftie a dozen ways
2 for the death blow

>>132699865
Tucker to make that face he makes
Rand to make actual arguments
Alex Jones to rip his shirt off at the most appropriate moment

>>132700115
100%

>>132704904
GOLD

I would pay to see that

>>132699865
5 7 9

179 is solid as fuq

>>132700007
>>132704513
You are right about Tucker and Shapiro (quite clearly the two best debaters of the list). But Milo would be fucking terrible in a debate against leftists.

He is really not good at responding to criticism. When a lefty criticises him, he always attacks the lefty on a personal level. He uses personal insults. Rather than responding to the point calmly and rationally with a convincing argument.

That usually gets whoops and hollers from his fans - but it wouldn't be effective at convincing moderates in a debate. Instead he'd just come across as obnoxious.

Tucker and Shapiro don't get rattled by opponents. Instead they calmly and rationally take apart their opponents' arguments and explain their reasoning for why they have a different position. And they're very good at being convincing.

>>132699865
4 7 9. I'm not much of a fan of the latter two, but they'll get the job done. I'd swap em out for Jared Taylor and possibly James Allsup

>>132704796
>>132705009
Senpai

>>132699865
3 4 and 7

File: 1497140776231.jpg (34KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 720x540px

>>132699865
2, 3 and 7.

>>132699865
1,6,9

>>132700007
Try 4, 7, and 9
>bonus: give me Ron and end the fed

>>132699865
179 or 169

>>132699865
6;7,8

6,8,9

Can't lose with jews

>>132704661
My fucking man. That's what I chose and it's definitely the right choice.

I think most people in this thread have identified Tucker and Shapiro as the best two. And I think that is right, they are definitely the two best debaters in that list.

So the question is the third one, but I agree with you, that Rand is the best of the rest. He's a politician, he's used to arguing with the opposing side. Yes he's a little niche, and I don't think he is quite as convincing to moderates as Tucker and Ben are. But he's still very experienced and capable.

Most of the others in the selection are people who only preach to the converted. They're not used to having to defend their positions from attacks by the other side. Not in a way that is convincing to moderate people, anyway.

>>132699865
4 6 7, no doubt about it

>>132699865
>Tucker Carlson
>Jordan Peterson
>Theodore Kaczynski

File: 4F3F2B23-E3D6-44FF-B493-7840315D8B29-23108-00000E3E14DC55D7.jpg (49KB, 600x602px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x602px

Kek decides his pic

>>132705253
>>132705324
This.

>>132705253
Well tbqh I have Milo on my team purely for the lulz and because I am not familiar with 1, 4 or 8.

File: 1486437784504.png (268KB, 485x416px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 485x416px

>>132700115

DREAM TEAM

Who's 1?

>>132699865
>>
6,7,2

File: Thomas Sowell.jpg (72KB, 846x333px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 846x333px

>>132699865

I'd take Rand Paul, his dad, and Thomas Sowell.

>>132699865
4,7,9 i hate how shapiro is a kike but he is a good speaker as long as he doesn't touch gun rights

File: 1497878491254s.jpg (3KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x125px

9 for his relentless dialetic
6for his undeniable charisma
1 for minority representation

>>132704801

His superpower is being a gay jewish coalburner, can shame the cis white lefties. He'd be awesome with Sam Hyde. Hyde can go off the walls autistic and Milo can deal with the blowback

File: 89472142141.jpg (559KB, 1152x2048px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1152x2048px

>>132701448
People that hate Shapiro like Jones

Why? Low IQ

The only correct answer from this list is Rand, Tucker, Shapiro - assuming a random topic. D'Souza and Milo both have areas they are more knowledgeable in.

Jones and PJW are morons that can't argue and would be detrimental. Hannity is just trash. Don't know who 8 is.

>>132705531

Based Poo who makes videos elegantly exposong leftwing hypocrisy

Also real good public speaker

2, 6, 7. Funniest shit ever

>>132699865
7,8 will do. #1 for token poo

>>132705083
>>132705253
The correct choice.

I'd have to say no to Jared Taylor though, just because his brand is far too toxic. He's an intelligent guy, but the positions he defends are not palatable to a mainstream audience, no way.

>>132705609
I agree with the exception of PJW. He is staged but makes an impact with his vids. Rand has a strong message but he is not an orator that can be impactful in a sound bite.

>>132705558
>watching Sowell say Obama was a far left nut with no scruples
guy is pretty great

>>132705609
vids of the lifts or I call bullshit

File: 3243143.jpg (10KB, 214x236px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 214x236px

/pol/acks like this Neocon kike?
Reddit really has taken over this place

>>132700115
>Alex to bring the pain
>Rand to bring the legal knowledge
>Tucker to bring the arguments
Serious power build right here, should be banned from tournaments

File: 1494424381229.jpg (53KB, 750x557px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 750x557px

>>132699865
2, 4, 6, and 7 are the right wing dream team

>>132705870
of course its bullshit the nigger is like 5'5" and sits around complaining about how America isn't helping Israel enough

>>132700628
THIS

>>132705905
> Recognizing his skills
> Liking him

What is nuance?

>all these fags picking Alex Jones
And then you wonder why everyone takes /pol/ as a joke

>>132699865
I'll take three number 2's please

>>132705463
Milo is shit at responding to criticisms though. He always responds with personal attacks. It comes across as very petty.

I'm also unfamiliar with 1 and 8. 4 is Rand Paul, and I haven't seen much of him speak, but I've seen a little bit of him speaking in Congress. He's a Republican Senator, but like his dad, he's very libertarian-minded. I watched a bit of him arguing against some government-spending measure in the Senate and he seemed like a strong arguer.

>>132705582
Another person who is correct.

>>132704426

But what about Kurt Eichenwald? Who else on the left has the requisite knowledge of big titted 2D waifus needed to succeed in the modern debate circuit?

File: 2393EF55-0294-42F3-BDC5-C367ACE5C7ED-23108-00000E4193618E23.png (85KB, 500x407px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 500x407px

>>132706117

File: Mark_Zuckerberg_em_setembro_de_2014.jpg (9KB, 220x307px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 220x307px

>>132699865
ZUCKERBERG2020 - "He's Our Collective FACE!"

Why to vote for Zuckerberg 2020:

>a brilliant programmer and entrepeneur who developed the single most influential website of the modern era in a dorm room
>a genuinely funny, charismatic, and altruistic man who has the best interests of both America and her allies at heart
>experienced in negotiations with very hostile parties, always securing his position in the end
>compassionate yet rational and science-backed policies

1, 4 and 9.

>>132699865
2 and 7
Tag team

File: Jones.jpg (73KB, 1200x794px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1200x794px

>>132705609
>Jones and PJW are morons that can't argue and would be detrimental. Hannity is just trash. Don't know who 8 is.

Jones has a problem with going off topic and not really letting his opposition speak much. he will go off on 50 different tirades at once and lacks focus in a debate. But at the same time, he clearly gets a lot of intel from insider sources, and that is his most powerful weapon. That is why I put him as my wild card.

>>132705905
I like the way he debates, not his beliefs

If I actually wanted to win a debate,
>9, 9, 9

If I was just going for bants and to trigger the libs
>2, 6, 7

>>132705609
You've made the right selection, but I have to ask, where is Milo "more knowledgeable" than those three? Islam? I don't think he is at all. I think Shapiro would offer better arguments on that subject.

Milo is pretty intelligent, but he is too easily rattled by opponents - he ALWAYS responds to critics with personal attacks. That doesn't look good in a debate; it's petty.

Also I don't think PJW is a moron, but he certainly lacks the experience of facing critics/opponents.

And I don't believe Hannity is "trash" - I watched his interviews of President Trump where he was criticising him a bit, and it did seem Hannity does have a bit of intelligence. But first and foremost he is a presenter, so again I think he lacks the debating experience - he lacks the experience of having to defend his positions from hostile opponents.

>>132706069
Just bring up Israel and he will turn into a screaming Neocon faggot
>Muh antisemitism
>Never forget the 6 gorillion
He even found a way to bring up WW2 in this
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WozIa1r_Vkk

>>132705905
It's not about liking him, it's about who would be good in a debate with leftists - that is the question being asked. Ben is a fierce debater, and he's good at winning over moderate people.

File: everythingisayisright.jpg (32KB, 550x343px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 550x343px

>>132699865
Shapiro>Rand>Tucker>D'Souza>Levin>Jones>Hannity>PJW>Milo

File: Not Amolymused.png (314KB, 520x507px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 520x507px

>>132699865
Why no dis guy?

>>132706304
>intel from insider sources
You mean conspiracy theory bullshit that he pulls out of his ass.

I love AJ as entertainment, he's fucking hilarious, but he would not win over moderate minds in a debate.

>>132699865
>jewish cocksuckers

what is your point, op?

>>132699865
567

>>132699865
I pick 9 to argue with a toaster oven.

>>132705609
>5+pl8 squat
>those legs
dyel?

>>132706628
I chose the same top three as you, but I'm interested why you put Rand above Tucker? For me it's definitely the other way around. Tucker is really good in public debates, whereas I think Rand can be a little bit niche in some of his positions.

>>132706672
Because he's fucking shit. Manchild who whinges in his bedroom. Quite literally no way he would hold up to scrutiny if he was on a team with people like Tucker and Ben Shapiro. He'd crumble.

>>132706672
Pseudo intellectual you tube faggit?

>>132699865
9, 3, and 7.

Nobody else will get a word in.

>>132700007
Fpbp

> Idiots, non-whites and neurotic kikes

none of the above

>>132702805
>Bimbo coal burner is hot asf
Nope

>>132706672
> Why no this guy
THATS NOT AN ARGUMENT NEWFAG

>>132706867
>>132706867
>You mean conspiracy theory bullshit that he pulls out of his ass.

That's why people underestimate Alex Jones. It is easy to write him off as being batshit insane (well, he is), but he seems to have some direct lines in the US government.

Alex Jones is by far the weirdest one of the group, people think he is really stand up comedian Bill Hick's under a new identity.

File: vlcsnap-2017-07-06-12h23m28s194.png (386KB, 640x386px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 640x386px

>>132699865
I don't know who are 1 and 8

>>132699865
nobody takes any of those people serious except for suburban americans

>>132699865
what ever my last three digits are. 0 is a peterson wild card.

>>132699865
5,6,7
team BASED

>>132707516
fuck

File: 1446330430639.png (2MB, 2037x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2037x1440px

Rand, Tucker, Levin.

File: 1456098543369.gif (89KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 400x400px

>>132699865
2 5 7 for entertainment

>>132699865
can I have 7,7 and 7?

>>132699865
Tucker the leftist cucker, Ben "Shabbos Jew" Shapiro and Dinesh D'Souza, only known poo actually trained to use the loo.

>>132699865
Ben, tuck, rand

>>132699865
1,4,9

>>132705787
>Too toxic for mainstream audience
Why shouldn't his ideas be introduced to the mainstream?

>>132705059
You need to watch old Milo. He used to be an extremely elegant and rational debater, but he realized the only way he could make money was by being a snarky edgelord.

I would lead with Tucker to get in 20 jabs to set the tone, call in AJ to drop the bombs while they're weak, then while they're thoroughly disoriented and discredited, finish with Rand to make my position seem acceptable by the masses to show that the team being debated is fringe.

Hannity's a shill, PJW is an aggrotard, Milo is neutral. I didn't recognize the rest.

>>132699865
9, 7 and 4

Who that you politically disagree with would you be most scared to take on in a debate?

For me it's probably Al Franken or Trey Gowdy

>Thomas Sowell
>Ben Shapiro
>Ravi Zacharias

Literally unbeatable by anyone. Anyone who disagrees has already lost the game.

Check em.

>>132708301
>9, 7 and 4

This is the only answer

>>132700371
ftw

>>132708371
OH or Noam the gnome Chompsky at like 50-60 years old
Don't imagine any conservative would survive that debate. Buckley certainly didn't

Literally all of these people are bad at debating.

5, 6, 7

normies already lost.

File: 1499080939493.png (157KB, 625x370px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 625x370px

and 7

>>132708648
So who is good at debating?

And don't tell me molymeme

File: tmp_6744-IMG_20170707_012106-1560082205.jpg (156KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1200x675px

>>132699865
I'll take three Rand Pauls, please.

>>132708532

Conservatives who refuse to mention human neurocognitive diversity are fighting with one hand tied behind their back and a blindfold on. Buckley spent his entire career trying to appeal acceptable to the left, yoi can't really debate them when you've already defined reality in their terms.

>>132699865
MICHAEL SAVAGE OF COURSE

File: IMG_2842.jpg (27KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x400px

>everybody always picks Shapiro
>nobody ever mentions Andrew Klavan

Seriously, what the fuck is the deal with this guy? He's one of the few commentators that was first successful outside of commentating and is 100% funnier and more likeable than the Shills and losers in OP's lineup.

The dude was a mega-successful writer that was friends with Breitbart, than just casually laid out the exact plans and responses of the last 3 administrations but he gets... nothing. He even has a podcast on the same network as Shapiro!

I swear conservatives will keep fucking themselves over as long as they keep following the Reddit-tier "Le WATCH AS THEY SCHOOL LIBERALS" stream and not actually focusing on controlling the culture. But I can't stand Ben and I think Klavan's funny, so maybe I'm just biased.


But does anyone else agree the whole YouTube/reddity "watch Shapiro DESTROY leftist" thing is dumb as fuck?

Thw - don't even need 3

Michael Anton
Angelo Codeviila

>>132707432
>he seems to have some direct lines in the US government
Well he's had Trump on his show, but apart from that, what are you referring to? And what evidence do you have for this?

I don't even usually refer to him as a "conspiracy theorist" these days because I think he largely doesn't deal in that stuff anymore. He has realised there's now a big market in appealing to Trump supporters - in covering politics in a more honest way. He doesn't need to resort to conspiracies anymore.

But I'm just wondering what "connections" you think he has. I'd argue that most of the time he talks about Washington inner workings, he's probably just speculating.

2, 5, 9

team [autistic screeching]

Oshay Duke Jackson (Niggers BTFO)
Sinead Mccarthy (Jews BTFO)
Varg (Monothestic cucks BTFO)

>>132709167
Klavan is definitely more fun to listen to but I don't know if he is a good debater

>>132699865
The Diverse Conservatives: 1,2,6

Dinesh D'Souza because he's an immigrant
My Boy Alex for the history lessons
Milo because he sucks cocks and gr8 b8

>>132708093
He's not going to win a debate, and the question in OP's image is who would win a debate.

>>132708197
I've not watched anything of him before he dyed his hair blonde. I'm sure he does have the intelligence to debate properly, but like you say, these days he is just trying to be an edgelord, and the fact that he seems to respond to all criticisms with personal attacks might endear him to an audience of his fans, but it doesn't help you win over moderate people in a debate setting.

>>132708301
>>132708411
Both correct

>>132700115
Drop rand for hannity and drop a quick mention of Seth Rich for absolute max liberal butthurt.

>>132699865
4,5, and 7 least influenced by zionists and good public appeal

File: 1488510900570(2).jpg (47KB, 700x1007px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 700x1007px

>>132699865
Milo + Shapirro combo would be absolutely spectacular.

And the third would be Alex Jones for the keks and to keep them from killing each other, that would be quite a party.

File: 43252525.jpg (8KB, 327x154px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 327x154px

Levin, Larry Elder and Prager.

>>132700602
LOL

File: 1977.jpg (34KB, 321x340px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 321x340px

>>132699865
2,7 and 9

File: 1478589959371.jpg (6KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 184x184px

>>132699865
I literally just need Shapiro

I guess I'll take Rand too

>>132705905
I know......BUT

No one can beat him in a debate.

>>132699865
Sean Hannity X 3

>>132705905
I think he is sleasy and dishonest waiting for a good time to stab us in the back BUT he's a fucking strong enimy of our enemies.

Just keep an eye on him at all times.

>>132709263
He mentions that he does quite frequently on his show. Given that nobody has called it a bluff at this point, I get this feeling that it may be true. That is not exactly much to go by.

File: bob-page-deus-ex-mankind-divided.jpg (37KB, 618x412px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 618x412px

>>132699865
>777

you literally can't cuck the tuck

File: 1474064585979.jpg (26KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x300px

>>132704426
Crazy Elizabeth Warren Vs. Crazy Alex Jones would be hilarious to watch

File: image.jpg (59KB, 640x424px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x424px

You only need one, but make sure it's the right one.

>>132699865
679 would be fapworthy

>>132699865
Dinesh, hannity, rand

>>132699865
jared taylor

>>132699865
4, 6 and I guess 3 if I have to have 3. My first two should be enough

>>132700007
fpbp

>>132699865
pre sure I know who that indian dude is

so 1, 7 if hes allowed to research, and 9

>>132700630

this. 1,4,9 is the ONLY correct answer.

File: Laughs_in_Spanish.jpg (15KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x460px

>>132706243

>>132699865
Jordan Peterson isn't on that list.

I would take Tucker Carlson as someone with experience in the media.

Then Rand Paul for political experience.

Jordan Peterson for academic experience.

File: goad.jpg (25KB, 599x448px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 599x448px

>>132702455
I agree. Pic related--for humor's sake, I'd actually really like to see a "debate" between Goad and Shapiro, or have them on my team.

All trash.
I choose JBP, Dugin and Steve Bannon.

Milo is literally a troll have you ever seen his "debates", probably doesn't believe half the stuff that comes out of his mouth, he only says It to stir shit up.

Alex Jones is literally handicapped, like some serious mental issues with that one. 5 has extreme personality disorders, and only talks to a camera, might be shit in a real debate. 3 is a GOP robot.

Rand Paul would be good in a TEAM, his ideas alone are bat shit crazy. so 4 8 9

>>132699865
Shapiro, Levin, and Paul. Fucking obviously

1 2 7

2 & 7 seem to be the most popular.