why do politicians say their country needs more people and thus

>>132577507

>more people = more labor
>more labor = cheaper labor
>cheaper labor = reduced costs
>reduced costs = more competitive
>more competitive = more profits

Transitive Property.

>More people = more profit (not for you though)

>>132577810
i don't think that even makes sense though practically. up to a certain point, say you want 1 million low skill labourers, but after that it's complete waste. there isn't enough low skill work and more people just brings down the quality of life beyond that.

>>132577963

>caring about the quality of life of the plebs

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
*breathes in*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Also after low-skilled labor is saturated you invent the college-meme and get everyone to go to college and saturate every white-collar occupation too.

They want to destroy nations, borders nationalities, culture and ethnicity to usher in global government.

>>132578352
and what happens to an advanced society when you destroy the white collar professions?

>>132577507
its not for their country its for the (((global))) economy