Thread replies: 2
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1497336278747.jpg (2MB, 1774x1602px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1774x1602px
Anarchists would rather live in grass huts if it were women who built them.
>Camille Paglia, anti-feminist literary theorist, meditates thusly on civilization and women:
>>“When I see a giant crane passing on a flatbed truck, I pause in awe and reverence, as one would for a church procession.
>>What power of conception: what grandiosity: these cranes tie us to ancient Egypt, where monumental architecture was first imagined and achieved.
>>If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.”
>The “glories” of civilization and women’s disinterest in them.
>To some of us the “grass huts” represent not taking the wrong path, that of oppression and destructiveness.
>In light of the globally metastasizing death-drive of technological civilization, if only we still lived in grass huts!
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/john-zerzan-patriarchy-civilization-and-the-origins-of-gender
Why are there humans like this? Where did we go so wrong? I'm not even being sarcastic anymore. I'm desperately searching for an answer. Why did the eternal father abandon us to this fate of degeneracy and regressiveness?
>>
>>132572771
Women are natural socialists, syndicalists, and communists. Their very nature is to take and share and maintain a system that is thankless to them for it. Had women not been this way, our species would've been extinct a loooooong time ago.
Men on the other hand are natural individualists, capitalists, and ofc, anarchists. No man besides a eunuch does anything out of his interest and his interest alone. From single handedly building empires to serving as generals, all men seek to build a legacy and dynasty in one form or another to preserve and advance what each sees as the best hope for our species. Again, had we not, we'd all be dead long ago.
Thread posts: 2
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1