Every time i go to my grandma's house i see a whole lot of Christian Science Monitor weekly magazines. I read a few and it seemes surprisingly balanced and comprehensive. What is /pol/'s opinion on it? Is it FAKENEWS or a good, wholesome news outlet?
>>132437688
they're cool, decent and sober journalism, and Christian Science is basically the same mental techniques that creates tulpas
>>132437688
It's not great, but it isn't bad either. It's alright.
>>132437688
Your grandma is a spastic cunt, Jesus isn't real
>>132439002
Don't be rude
>>132437688
>(((Science)))
>>132439002
don't say shit about my grandma you... you.... AUSTRALIAN!
>>132439002
it's just a news magazine dude it isn't actually religious
CSM isn't actually religious, the name is a holdover from what they used to be decades ago.
They're basically just a normal news outlet now.
its good.
It leans lightly liberal but not as bad as most rags in America. I'm not sure if the Christian Science church still sponsors it or not but Mary Baker Eddy did set out to have the CSM be based on honest, unbiased news reporting since even in her day she was sick of fake news. I don't know if there's really any way of subscribing though beyond physically going to a Christian Science Reading Room though.
>>132437688
It's a normie liberal newspaper.
It has nothing to do with Christian Science. I assume Jews bought it out as a lark and kept the name for s&g.
>>132439776
>Jews bought it
proof?