What's is your opinion on Reuters? Is it a legitimate news source or is it also #FakeNews like Daddy says?
It's owned by the Rothschilds...
>>132433598
Do you have any proof? I tried finding online and all i got was a bunch of conspiracy sites of dubious quality
ok here's a slightly more comprehensive page i found
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/11qlk9/is_there_any_proof_that_the_rothschilds_own/
Financial outlets, such as WSJ and Reuters, are top tier when it comes to media companies.
Their reader base primarily relies on them for business news and stock updates. In addition, their readers tend to be older, more career minded, and actually have investments, meaning they will lean conservative. This reflects on their journalistic personality; they know their readers simply want the facts and no bull. In addition, sites like WSJ and Forbes are subscription driven, meaning they arent as suspecible to yellow journalism/pandering to retards so as to boost ratings, such as FauxNews or FNN
You shouldnt rely on one source for your news, and its always good to incorporate these financial outlets into any routiine
>>132433286
Fake news but very cleverly disguised as real.
>>132437024
What's that supposed to mean?