Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: IMG_6834.png (72KB, 485x750px) Image search:
[Google]
72KB, 485x750px
what does /pol/ think of electoral corporatism as Mosley put it? how would you make it work in the U.S?
>It is the deliberate aim of Fascism to bring to an end the Party game which we believe to be the ruin of the Nation. We substitute a new system of action suited to the modern age for the system of talk which belongs to the past. For instance, a Parliament elected under Fascism will be a technical and not a political Parliament. The franchise will be occupational and not geographical. Men and women will vote according to their industry or profession, and not according to their locality. They will vote for people versed in the problems of their industries, and not for professional politicians. In such a system there is no place for parties and for politicians. We shall ask the people for a mandate to bring to an end the Party system and the Parties. We invite them to enter a new civilisation. Parties and the Party game belong to the old civilisation, which has failed.
>>
>>132276260
Mosley was right then and he'd be even more right now. Now more than ever it is a nonsense that a bus driver elects a lawyer to preside over (say) agriculture. The public doesnt know the questions, the politicians dont know the answers, and we all wonder why it is a suck a fucking disaster.
>>
>>132276629
once the idea was described to me it just made sense
it cannot be mussolini corporatism, that was basically just crony capitalism with a socialist veneer
>>
>>132276260
>how would you make it work in the U.S?
It wouldn't.
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1