Why is it that animals like pic related have far more genetic

>>132274365
Animals: genes that are not related to looks are those that are mostly diverse
Humans: genes that are related to looks are those that are mostly diverse

>>132274365
>Then you have humans who are far less genetically diverse
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>132274365
Evolution didn't affect humans. We're all essentially identical. When it comes to humans, evolution is just for decoration. It wouldn't be fair otherwise.

>>132274768
Go look at internet discussions in normie places. This is the general consensus.

>>132275060
What? Is this like a creationism thing?

>>132274532
I wonder why this occurred then?

It's crazy how alike those tigers are when compared to a Sub-Saharan African and a Nordic person.