Why do so many Americans accept their retarded two party system? Both parties are pretty much the same and never bring any real change.
>>132246273
Same everywhere
Worked for too long
but people have woken up
so (((they're))) introducing alternative parties aka controlled opposition
America is against socialism/communism. this is a capitalist country. the two different parties are just conservative or liberal social lifestyles and some slightly different policies of basically the same token. obama was our first communist president which is why the country got so pissed off and leaned so right. if you push too hard left too fast....its gonna swing back even further right
>>132246273
Well I'm not happy about it but I felt like I was staring down the barrel of a gun with Hillary whose agenda was basically "make America more like Europe."
I think Trump is a feckless moron with a penchant for taking Jewish cock in his ass but I'd vote for him over and over again if it meant keeping disgusting, abhorrent, milquetoast quasi-socialists out of our government.
>>132246661
>Obama was a communist
wew
>>132246754
I wouldn't even bother voting, either way the US gets fucked over by the jews. The only thing that could actually bring change would be revolution.
>>132246857
We don't need revolution inasmuch as we need reform i.e. white unity and removal of inane economic policy which only benefits Jews, blacks, and mestizos. Remove deadweight like blacks and parasites like Jews, plus an underclass of Mexicans depressing white working class wages and nothing radical needs to be done with exception to repealing all the retarded muh equal rights and muh no discrimination laws.
But I'm not an anarchist so obviously I don't consider revolution useful
>>132247216
I'd like to avoid revolution as much as possible but voting never really changes anything and the two parties right now would never reform a system which benefits them so much. The US would need a seriously selfless leader for that to happen and I don't see that happening very soon.
>>132247354
But I don't think any single leader can do much, look how much Trump is being obstructed in implementing his agenda right now; our government is simply not set up for swift action and quick change
Maybe we do need a revolution, but a cultural one. We need whites to vote en masse and develop a consciousness. If people things are bad now they ought to wait and see what happens as whites are demographically replaced.
>50% of the population behind one party
>50% behind the other
If either party breaks, that means the other party, who opposes everything you stand for will have indefinite and total control over every level of the government. And so, no matter how much your principals are compromised, all you can do is vote for the least evil shitty candidate your party chooses to give you.
2 party systems are shit/
>>132247791
Trump isn't being obstructed at all, he could do most of what he wanted. The truth is he's a con man, he lied during the election to gain power for his puppet masters. Also if whites did decide to vote en masse, who would they vote for? Both extremely similar parties have pretty much a monopoly over the population.
>>132247216
>its duh joos
Take that trash out and you are on to something
>>132246661
>Obama was a communist
What the fuck? I know american politics skews right, but Obama would be counted as centre-right wing on a global scale politically and centre-left at most on an american scale.
Stop watching so much Alex Jones.
>>132246857
Stop using the ancom flag if you think "IT IS THE JOOS", you should damn know it is the ruling bourgeois neoliberal class if you're really an ancom
>>132246754
Everything European or Socialist is bad so I'd rather vote for jews who want to work me to death because they told me "everything European or socialist is bad."
-You.
Socialist became a dirty word after right-wingers turned it into one to associate working class activists with communists.
People who wanted affordable healthcare and fairer hours got kiked and ostracised.
Learn to think critically. You literally got jew played.
>>132246273
We don't, that's how we got Trump.
>Trump isn't being obstructed at all
Laughably lying to everyone here.
The travel ban is specifically covered in the Constitution yet the MSM, 4th circuit, 9th circuit, and ACLU all screamed how it's against the Constitution. Only when it got to the Supreme Court did they have to actually follow the law and approve it 9-0. What happens then? The ACLU opens a lawsuit on the definition of clearly stated phrases on the Supreme Court's 9-0 decision.
They refuse to accept the law. They will sue eternally with Sorosbux until 8 years are up.
>>132248916
>american politics skews right
No, the rest of the world, excluding eastern europe and russia, skew way left. Your countries (mine too) are all cucks for commies.
>>132246273
Because it's hard to overcome the inertia of a huge system, with trillions of dollars behind it, entrenched in their institutions.
Why do you think we voted for Trump?
>>132249251
I'm not an ancom but it's the closest thing to my ideology. I know it's the ruling class of the bourgeois however that class mostly consists of zionists.
>>132246273
>masonic checkerboard floor at the salty spittoon
Just like real life. Masons own everything.
the two-party system is inevitable in our particular type of democracy. Politicians are always fighting for the most moderate (the median) position because to veer away from it is to sacrifice votes. It's one of the many flaws of democracy, and one of the reasons I don't support democracies.
every now and then, for small geographic areas, a politician is able to build up enough passionate grassroot support to win an election with a relatively extremist position. It's impossible to do so in elections for large populations with high turnout.
>>132246273
More parties sure works well in other places. I mean with our two parties we are getting invaded by musli- hey wait a minute.
>>132250427
>the two-party system is inevitable in our particular type of democracy
That's why I support a different type of democracy
>>132250722
Why the hell are their hands deformed? Is that some new super power that allows them to overpower the government and overthrow it? Does their giant malformed collective hand cure issues with human nature that are partially solved by any form of structured government depending on the population and setting?
>>132251574
I don't understand. Are you saying anarcho-syndicalism is against human nature?
>>132249272
Nice try, Levi
>>132252113
I'm saying that you clearly aren't thinking things through and have no clue about human nature so essentially yes. Even if that were to "work" it would have to be in an extremely small ethnostate. If you don't understand that you need to start over and find out where you went wrong.
>>132252360
How is it against human nature? Trade unions are given a large amount of power so the workers decide upon what happens rather than the bourgeois I think having the majority decide is more natural then having a select few control what happens.
>>132246273
because you're not allowed to
>>132252769
Have you worked in groups before? Like at work or at school? What happens in groups?
>>132252936
From my experience there's been disputes but most of them have been fixed by the majority of people with the same opinions. That's why trade unions decide upon things rather than the individual in anarcho-syndicalism.
>>132253158
Stop repeating yourself, that tells me you are repeating what you have been told. You haven't had lazy people in groups? You haven't been the guy who had to do all the work because you didn't want a bad grade? Was there ever a person in your group that gravitated towards the leadership role because that's how things get done? Have you not seen how slow and ineffective bureaucracy and other forms of "checking with everyone" is? I'm trying to speak simply here to maybe help you.
>>132246273
It's the facade.
europeans have like 7 political parties but nothing ever gets done except more socialist policies and more taxes. america is like tug of war which goes back and forth but stays around the center