"U.S. investigators have examined reports from intellig

> according to U.S. officials with knowledge of the intelligence

Sure. Those guys again.

File: IMG_0449.jpg (30KB, 400x320px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x320px

Why would Flynn be interested in Yoga routines? Unless of course you think Hillary should get 5 years per email she wasnt supposed to have on there.

Has there really been no followup to this story? It honestly is really hard to believe that the Wall Street Journal would post a sentence like that with no actual sources. How can they keep doing this?? Someone please confirm that there are no actual sources for this hideous sentence before I talk about it on Facebook.

Come on guys give me some sources!!! Is there actually an intelligence report from an intelligence agency that shows that actual Russians were looking to sell Clinton's emails??!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Lots of other news organizations referenced this terrible sentence in their own crappy reporting. How are we letting journalists get away with this shit?!?!?! It is absolutely ridiculous that this passes as journalism nowadays!!!! Please someone show me a credible link to the actual "intelligence report"

>>132237058
>according to U.S. officials with knowledge of the intelligence
fake source = fake news.

THIS IS EXACTLY HOW FAKE NEWS IS CREATED!!! HOW CAN WE DRAW ATTENTION TO THIS COMPLETELY BULLSHIT FAKE NEWS STORY??

This seems dubious. Have anonymous sources revealed that ALL 17 intelligence agencies testified in a closed-door session that they agree that this is true?

File: IMG_0034.jpg (546KB, 1536x1989px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1536x1989px

>>132238155

The WSJ is as never Trump as NRO. The neoCON mensheviks have infested everything. This "story" is fake AF, and besides- even if true, it would tell a story of a patriot attempting to repatriate FOIA public property that had already been leaked from a conspicuously unsecured and illegal bathroom jalopy server.

Pic related is the real scandal.

File: image.jpg (104KB, 337x1024px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 337x1024px

Pic related

>>132237058

and there is a reason why no one in the MSM picked up on this besides Richard Madcow at MSNBC.

trust that the minute anything remotely salacious or damning comes out about Trump x Russia <3<3, they will be spamming the fuck out of it 24/7. You won't hear the end of it.

Lot's of other "news articles" came out referencing the Journal article with no sources. It is beyond obvious that this is fake news. It will fade away because it is literally nothing, but we should really find a way to draw attention to this complete bullshit. After all this discussion of "fake news" can the Wall Street Journal of all news sources post such a bs sentence as this??!?!?!?

http://archive.is/dQLG4
https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-activist-who-sought-clinton-emails-cited-trump-campaign-officials-1498872923

>>132237058
and I guess General Flynn was the guy who gave the emails to wikileaks?

how fucking stupid do they think we are??
Even normies are being stirred from their trustful slumber with this nonsense.

>>132242557
I believe this, but that's not my point. The Journal article is exactly what FAKE NEWS is. They wrote a BS sentence with no source that they reported as "news" and that other "news agencies" then also reported as "news". THIS IS THE CREATION OF FAKE NEWS! WE NEED TO MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF THIS! HOW CAN WE DRAW MORE ATTENTION TO THE FAKE NEWS RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES??

>>132237058
NO problem.....Pissgate tapes would silence all other rumors....they are going to be released SOON

James Angleton was right...
http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PE100/PE198/RAND_PE198.pdf

>>132243297
https://ia600205.us.archive.org/31/items/gov.archives.arc.54826/gov.archives.arc.54826_512kb.mp4

Europeans admit this is part of daily life. Just like Israeli's accept market bombings...Not something American's are accustomed to.
https://euvsdisinfo.eu/

>>132237058
The media uses this to avoid responsibility.
>oops our source was wrong
Then they have zero responsibility when the story is shit, or completely fabricated. I saw a thread weeks ago where a leaf sent a major news organization junk email claiming to have "leaks " and they published something from Jim Russels.