Bannon is going full retard Bernie. https://www.axios.com/s

Archiver spawn post

>>132234671

>yes goyim, don't let them raise taxes on me, need to keep you nice and poor!

>>132234671

He's fucking with the House/Senate GOP for getting cold feet when it comes to repealing Obamacare.

No tax cuts until they fix healthcare.

ARCHIVE BOT WHERE ARE YOU

>>132234671
>I'll defend my outsourcing overlords

I keep forgetting that anarcho-capitalism and nationalism are entirely incompatible.

>>132234671

I'm not in favor of taxing anyone who makes less than a million dollars a year, since they actual got their money through hard work and contribute something.

But if he wants to tax the (((bankers))) who produce nothing of value and make a boatload of money a year, go for it. Most of them are completely antithetical to the free market anyway; so fuck them.

>>132238967
>I'm not in favor of taxing anyone who makes less than a million dollars a year, since they actual got their money through hard work and contribute something
Nigger are you retarded

>>132234671
>taxing Wall Street employees who bought the world's best lawyers after they intentially fucked your economy to get them out of their jam by paying a small fine post-2008 is a bad thing
This is why ancrap is a meme ideology.

>>132234671
>>132234671
>(((sources)))
we never believe anything the media says why should we trust this article lmao

>>132234671
Bannon who said that he's a leninist??? b-but he was just reffering to the swamp and the state

>>132234671
You mean all the rich people who hate Trump? all those hollywood actors and such?

>lets cut taxes for people that donate to the DNC and vote democrat
>lets cut taxes for companies that push gay pride and everything else we stand against

t. republicucks

>>132234671
Bannon does not like the establishment kikes.

File: 1449680733960.jpg (16KB, 251x249px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 251x249px

>>132234671
>the wealthy control all institutions that are harming society
>(((academia)))
>(((media)))
>(((military industrial complex)))
>the wealthy can do no wrong
maybe they need a punch to the wallet to learn who allows them to exist despite the shit they pull.

>>132234671

Most of the super rich are heavily pro-democrat. Why should they get tax cuts ?

>>132239703
What you don't get is that Bannon is not republican or democrat.

>>132239755
This. Repeal or we start taxing you fuckers. This is where the left and the right should see eye to eye. It's actually about beating the shit out of shlomo not about arguing in circles while he puts us in more misery.

Nobody cares about rich kikes getting taxed more retard

>>132234671
Oy gevalt!

File: CKN60ZwUkAItHjp.jpg (101KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x683px

>>132234671

Banon is the voice of reason I can't believe it

>>132234671
That's different from wealth distribution dummies. Don't compare him to Bernie Cuck.

>>132234671
/pol/ is a capitalist board
Go home, socialists!

Except he's proposing cutting corporate and middle class taxes, something Bernie disagreed with as he wanted mine to go up about 20%.

>>132234671
The classic bait and switch.

Get the Jews and their campaign finance money on your side long enough to get elected, then tax the hell out of them once you're in power.

>>132234671
You guys didn't know what he said about banks and rich liberal elites?

>>132234671
"it is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion" Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, Book V.

The guy who invented the concept of "invisible hand of free market" would agree with Bannon.

>>132239219

Yea those small-business CEOs who bring jobs to his communities and that cardiologist who went to medical school for 10 years; they're just rich because of connections, they didn't do any hard work!

Go fuck yourself. All taxing these people will do will weaken vibrant communities of successful individuals.

>>132234671
>>132235280
>>132236490
Consider that link archived!
https://archive.fo/VeeyG

>>132240710
>I-I-I knew t-that everything Trump s-s-said in the campaign was j-just for jokes!

File: bannon_leninist_quote_feature-865x452.jpg (96KB, 865x452px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 865x452px

I will leave this here. This man is chief strategist of POTUS. Let that sink in.

File: 1491849415578.gif (160KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 400x388px

>>132234671
>asshurt ancaps now join /sg/ in betraying the God Emperor because he isn't sucking their dick on their pet issue
You niggers make me sick. This is about our civilization, not any one narrow issue.

>>132239401

this. ancaps inadvertently defend (((them))) without realizing it.

modern wall street is not a free market system anyway. it's not about raising capital anymore; it's only about manipulating with financial instruments like arbitrage.

cut taxes for those making less than 500,000 ish a year and small-businesses. raise taxes on the super wealthy (((elite)))

hopefully this can pay for actually necessary things like infrastructure developments

>>132241416
I hope this isn't supposed to be a bad thing because the only negative thing I see here is that Bannon isn't president instead of Trump.

>>132234671
fuck off kike

>>132241159
>not knowing basic economics
>not knowing that many small business owners make over $1 million a year
>not knowing some doctors (like my uncle) makes about $1 million annually
Why are nazi larpers so retarded? Stick to killing jews and leave economics to people who know what they're talking about

>>132241416
>sees this
>sees the assblasting the media has gotten the last couple months

Bannon is winning, folks. Always has been.

A rich tax is a jew tax, I approve. Ancap and libertarian goyim ITT won't though because they don't think in terms of immediate war, rather what an ideal white society would look like and implenting that shit in the current year

>>132240018
This. Due to the progressive nature of income taxes, any cut on the poor or middle class rares would help the rich more. He only needs to raise taxes in such a way that the rich will continue to pay the same amount they do today, while the poor and middle class get a bigger tax cut.

>>132241416
i know what he means but his use of Leninist is still odd to me. hopefully he wanted to say national socialist or hitlerist but couldnt.

File: 1464410890523.jpg (372KB, 596x496px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 596x496px

>>132236295
Lol, this.

File: trump tax cuts41.png (633KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 700x700px

>>132234671
BANNON NO! DON'T YOU DARE HURT MY BILLIONAIRE GLOBALIST OVERLORDS!

t. (((pol)))

>>132242922
>I know economics guise
>yes well muh uncle
hmmmmmmm

>>132234671
Good goy, we metropolitan Jewish progressives already paid our share in the holocaust!

File: image.jpg (77KB, 700x682px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 700x682px

>>132245459

File: wtf i love soros now.png (208KB, 922x667px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 922x667px

boy u goys got cucked good

Lobbyists who have met with Gary Cohn and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin say they've been struck by how impatient the two appear:

Cohn has told associates that if tax reform doesn't get done this year, it's probably never going to happen.
Sources who know Cohn speculate that he'll leave the White House the instant he concludes tax reform is dead.
While Cohn and Mnuchin differ stylistically — Cohn is brash and physically imposing while Mnuchin is mild-mannered — sources who've been meeting with them say they share the same philosophy: Go big or go home.

What that means:

Cohn and Mnuchin aren't bluffing when they say they want to slash the corporate tax rate to 15% from the current 35%. Neither man has any interest in timid tax cuts, and they wager that special interests will relinquish their loopholes if they become convinced their tax rate really will be in the teens.
They're becoming far less wedded to revenue neutrality — the idea, favored by House and Senate Republican leadership, that tax cuts mustn't add to the deficit.
They're increasingly tantalized by an idea some conservatives (like Grover Norquist and Sen. Pat Toomey) are pushing: Allow major tax cuts to last longer than 10 years without having to balance the budget. (More detail here.)

File: goldman sachs6.jpg (181KB, 1620x963px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1620x963px

>>132245934

wow, /pol/ adopted a Berniecrat position really fast

>>132234671
The ultra rich class is now mostly composed of Jews. Jews are far from noble kangz and kwanz. Get rid of them.

Hopefully a new rich class made up of mostly Whites will take their place.

>>132234671
>implying that this isn't the correct national socialist option

>>132240015
Get out of here socialist scum.

Let me see...

>rich billionaires unanimously support Hillary
>tell their news agencies to impede Trump
>want open borders so they have more slaves while at the same time live in gated communities

Yea no Bannon is right.

>>132234671
Good, most of the 1% were Hillary supporting retards.

File: hillary tax hikes on rich.png (73KB, 624x504px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 624x504px

>>132248297
Nice try shill. Hillary was going to raise taxes on the rich. Trump is slashing taxes on the rich. That's why your billionaire globalist overlords programmed you to hate Hillary and love Trump.

>>132234671
>>132248031

Bannon is entirely right, you autism-spectrum lolbertarian moron.

https://youtu.be/IB5KNoChGRY

File: goptaxcuts.jpg (275KB, 906x630px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 906x630px

>Steve Bannon is causing a stir inside the administration by pushing an idea that's anathema to most Republicans: raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans

>an idea that's anathema to most Republicans: raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans

Like I said. Cutting taxes on the rich has been GOP ideology for 40 years.

File: trump tax cuts2.jpg (76KB, 537x288px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 537x288px

>>132248613
This retarded tranny is fucking clueless

>>132234671
Raising high level income taxes is fine as long as you lower corporate taxes.

This rewards the rich who invest in companies that employ people rather than just buying stocks and leeching.

>>132248822
>autistic dumbass leaf posting irrelevant infographs to the OP
Styx destroys you, dummy.

>>132241660
>Implying pol didn't want Trump primarily because of his pro Assad stance
>Implying Assad is not one of the few good guys in the middle east
>Rather liking Saudis and acting like they are not the biggest problem in the middle east

Summerchild.
Dig and read up on the core of this board, ledditor. My claims are testable and well documented. 90% of pol was anti intervention, the rest didn't care.

File: wtf i love goldman sachs now11.png (642KB, 658x665px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 658x665px

>>132249224
I destroy him. You retards are so fucking cucked by your billionaire globalist hero Trump, you seem to forget who installed his Goldman Sachs cabinet in the first place.

Let me spare you the drama. Trump is not going to go with the Bannon plan. It has no support with the GOP Congress. Trump is going to go with the Gary Cohn billionaire globalist trickle down tax cut for the rich plan and you filthy little degenerate billionaire globalist supercucks will eat it up.

>taxing rich kikes is a bad thing
>implying

>>132248613
awww sweetie, the day of the rope for you socialists will soon come

>>132249978
bootlicking the 1%? for what asinine reason? they don't care about you.

>meme flag

oh it's a fucking retard posting heh

>>132234671
We'll see

File: 1490363394287.gif (2MB, 260x260px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 260x260px

>>132234671
>implying this isn't a good thing
Also, his tax plan involves huge cuts for working classes. So tell me this:

If """""conservatives""""" are so pro-tax cuts, why do they only focus on the tax rise for a small proportion of the population (who will still have more than enough money to live on), but entirely ignore the tax cut for the majority of working Americans?

Why are """""conservatives""""" such good goys?

>>132248659
>>132248822
So what happens if Bannon does actually pull this off? What will your post then?

This policy is fucking antisemitic. Bannon is an open racist and antisemite now trying to pass a tax plan that would hurt Jews the most. He belongs in prison.

Tax bankers. Leave the rest of us alone.

>>132249468
>I destroy him
You don't understand. He would utterly embarrass you in a debate, you laughably stupid random moron on 4chan.

>You retards are so fucking cucked by your billionaire globalist hero Trump
This.
Thread.
Has.
NOTHING.
To.
Do.
With.
Trump.

Moron.

>>132249978
You will be lined up and shot, you corporate cock-sucking treasonous shitbag.

File: trickledowneconomics.jpg (165KB, 550x405px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 550x405px

>>132250245
>bootlicking the 1%

That's all (((pol))) does. That's all the entire right wing/conservative movement has ever done.

How they convince rural and suburban retards otherwise is amazing to me.

>>132250566
Trump's favorite president is Andrew Jackson.
and Jackson had some very strong opinions about (((banks)))

>>132250245
The 1% built the country and made it great. Plebiscites are mostly useless leeches. To each his own.

File: HES WITH YOU AHAHAH.png (458KB, 649x566px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 649x566px

>>132250426
Not a fucking chance. Lol Trump is there to cut taxes on himself. Wtf did you think he was doing all this for? You?

File: jewish trump1.png (156KB, 283x277px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 283x277px

>>132250545
Delete this

>>132250697
>>132250697
>1% made the country
interesting, wanna give exposition to this idea of yours?

>>132245934
>>132246301
SHUT the FUCK UP you stupid shillary shariablue redditfags YOU LOST!!!!

>>132248822
>People making more money will save more from lower taxes

Wow insightful

>>132250617
This has nothing to with Trump? Bannon is Special Advisor to whom?

Oh please don't embarrass yourself, I would annihilate that skinny 4 eyed tranny in a debate. I don't even know much about him, I just see him posting his videos on here once in a while. He's a cuck just like the rest of u Trumptards

>>132234671
Taxing job-creators is never a good idea.

Confiscating the assets of globalist bloodsuckers is always a good idea. It was all stolen to begin with.

File: ptg.png (204KB, 296x829px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 296x829px

>>132250851
Fuck off, you guys are worse than shills.

>>132250697
Anarcho-capitalist should seriously be renamed billionaire globalist supercuck

File: syria support2.jpg (129KB, 1484x1023px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1484x1023px

>>132250993
your pic rel literally happened

>>132234671
>Taxing rich kike bankers is a bad thing
kill yourself jude

>>132234671
Tax the Jew

>>132250799
The great industry of the US was made by the 1%. Carnegie. Rockfeller. Ford.

The great cotton and tobacco industry was controlled by plantation owners, the 1%.

Mediocre plebians don't do anything but leech. Th 1% made our world. EVERYONE IS NOT EQUAL.

Europe, which has odd ideals about equality, has not produced anything but misery and cuckholdry.

File: trump tax cuts29 lyin king..jpg (146KB, 807x538px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 807x538px

>>132250884
Trump's tax plan favors the wealthy. That's your counterargument? Lol.

>>132241416
this is like those meme images comparing trump and hitler because they both drink water.

If you think something lenin thought is automatically wrong because it was thought by lenin you are a retard.

He was like professor kaczynski, he had some valid observations but his ultimate solution was flawed.

>>132250933
>This has nothing to with Trump?
No, it's about a quote by Steven Bannon. That's it, moron.

>Oh please don't embarrass yourself, I would annihilate that skinny 4 eyed tranny
You are nothing more than a (mouth-)breathing example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect. End of.

File: 5eb.jpg (26KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x750px

>>132251133

>>132245934
>canada

File: President Kushner5.png (379KB, 881x744px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 881x744px

>>132251098
Trumptards are fucking delusional.

I'll just leave this here.

>>132234671
>scoop

don't fall for it retards. It might be true and it's probably not.

>>132251239
Bannon is Special Advisor to whom?

Bannon doesn't sign tax legislation into law you absolute fucking moron.

You socialists need to learn about second-handers.

http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/second-handers.html

Everyone is not equal. In fact, most people are useless leeches that need to be told what to do. The 1% are the only group that are saving
and advancing humanity.

>>132251385
Bannon is chief strategist to POTUS.
I think Trump listens to him with attention.

>>132242922
>many small business owners make over $1 million a year
If thats their own personal salary then its too much
>doctors (like my uncle) makes about $1 million annually
Too much. Depending on where your uncle works he could be entitled for massive pay over what the average person works, i know health care can be draining and stressful, but basically nobody is worth a million a year.


Wealth 'equality' is stupid because some people need more money for whatever it is they do to actually work than others, so letting different people 'control' different amounts of capital is just fine, it makes sense.

But as far as their own personal take from it? No. If you make that much money and are not reinvesting it back into expanding the business or starting new ones up to employ more people you are effectively stealing prosperity from the nation.

File: President Kushner1.jpg (76KB, 710x473px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 710x473px

>>132251326
inb4 kushner has nothing to do with Trump LOL AHAHAHAHAHA

>>132251462
>>132251385
and Trump's favorite president is Jackson, and Jackson really hated banks

>>132234671
Good.

>>132251462
see >>132249468

>>132234671
If this happened the democratic party would be completely destroyed.

>>132251155
How does tax cuts for everyone, rich and poor, only favor the wealthy you retard?

>>132251519
Trump's favorite president changes by the day based on which one he can remember.

>>132251561
We will see in due time what happens. Trump has to consider his base, to which Bannon represents reality and not Cohn. We will see.

>>132234671
Bannon is alt-right. The alt-right are national socialists. Why are people still surprised when they do socialist stuff?

File: 056..jpg (71KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 400x600px

>>132241416

Nothing wrong with this, Lenin did nothing wrong

File: trump tax cuts13.png (76KB, 759x416px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 759x416px

>>132251595
See >>132248822


Lol you cucks have fallen for trickle down meme for 40 fucking years

>>132251414
>Source is Ayn RANDUMB ECKS DEE fanatics
>No statistics, no sources, no argument
>Nothing to go by
>Being this cucked by porky
Don't you have some babies to mutilate, Schlomo?

>>132250697
>>132251133
Nope. The entire infrastructure that makes those things possible AT ALL is created by the middle class. You are nothing more than a globalist corporate cock-sucking traitor (and literally on the autism spectrum like all ancap lolbertarians) and you should be shot alongside the liberals, as your insane ideology does nearly as much to destroy us as they do.

>>132239703
>>132239755
these guys get it

>>132251656
Trump can just send out a few tweets to appeal to his retarded base. He can fuck them all over he wants with actual policies, he doesn't care. He knows he can do whatever he wants and they will still support him. He even bragged and admitted that.

>>132250377
All legislated tax cuts made by Republican these last few years were for all income levels but socialist cunts cried only about how rich people got them to. The point is that taxation should borne equally and no one should be punished for being successful and rewarded for being a loser

Honestly Id swallow my pride on social issues & semantics if the so-called "alt right" swung left of the Democrats on economics

>>132251812
>he doesn not care.
He already worked for his base by cutting TPP and Paris wealth redistribution agreements. These are actions

File: bannon.png (393KB, 1200x1320px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 1200x1320px

>>132239710
exactly. Bannon is /myguy/ you call can fuck yourselves

>>132234671
>Trump raises the taxes to rich people.
>Now the left can't say that he is legislating for the 1%
Literally best move.

>>132251491
>if you don't spend your money like a retard, you're stealing

Keynesian economics is the most cancerous thing to ever be created. It's created countless generations of idiots who have no idea how to manage money

>raising income tax will do anything in regards to the richest 1%

if you actually want to plunder the richest people, you would simplify the code to get rid of the loopholes and then increase capital gains tax.

>>132251801
Lol no. The middle class wasn't picking cotton.

The 1% are the only group advancing humanity. The 90% need to be told what to do, because frankly, they're lazy and dumb.

Bleed the 1% and you destroy human advancement and turn into socialist europe where there is no innovation.

He wants to hit the Jews where it hurts.
The whole "raising taxes on the rich to lower taxes on the poor" is just a meme guys. It doesn't work out mathematically.
He's going after The Jews and their white partners and I'm all for it.

>>132234671
I can't handle politics anymore. It's all communism now.

>>132251707
You haven't answered my question. How does giving tax cuts to all income brackets only favor the wealthy

>>132252016
Yep. This. Objectively improves the economy, starts the fiscal dialogue that both parties have been neglecting, throws a curveball at liberals and neocons. It's fuckng perfect. This actually would be 4D backarat if he did it.

File: trickle-down-economics-pissing.jpg (108KB, 535x510px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 535x510px

>>132249468
>Trickle down till they drown
>golden showers on the worker

File: warren buffett.jpg (55KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 720x480px

>>132251857
Just because you're a billionaire globalist supercuck, doesn't mean your billionaire heroes and gods need tax cuts.

When the fuck did (((pol))) start fighting for George Soros interests?

Part 2 — Billionaire Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/

>>132252182
Not communism, just envy

>>132252223
pls >>132251894
respond

>>132252184
It disproportionately favors the wealthy. I never said only. Nice try .Why not just cut taxes for those making under $100k? Why do you supercucks and GOP establishment shills always fight for tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St6ZNHKLiP0&feature=youtu.be&t=214

>>132252223
Answer the question because all you've done is bring up rhetoric and hyperbole. How do tax cuts for everyone only favor the wealthy?

File: cucked by trump.png (240KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 800x600px

>>132251894
He's also cucked on most of his promises to them and his tax plan is a huge giveaway to the 1% >>132248822

File: trump golden shower3.gif (2MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x480px

>>132252207

>>132252145
But that's literally what Bill Clinton did in the 90s and it left us with the biggest surplus in US history. Bush ruined with his tax cuts and the military spending that came with invading Iraq and Afghanistan and not to mention the useless TSA and HIV aid in Africa.

>>132252481
Like?

wtf I love wealth redistribution now

>>132252469
You're literally strawmanning. You're asking me to answer for something I never said. Do you admit that?

>>132252143
>autistm spectrum just restates its provably stupid and wrong platitudes
Here's someone smarter than you disproving your absolute retardism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IB5KNoChGRY

Here's someone far smarter than both you also disproving it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKaPeWoS7PQ

Reminder to thread that lolbertarians are almost as destructive to human civilization as are Marxists.

>>132252057
that money only exists, and was only earned, due to the workings of a system that expects you to do certain things with it to keep it all working properly.

>>132252390
You're still ignoring that all income brackets got a tax cut and that simple logic says those pay more end up saving more. That doesn't show favor, it shows scale

>>132242922
>nazi larper
Nigga do you even know what a swastika looks like? Here's a hint, it isn't a fucking hammer and sickle.

File: 1993 omnibus3.png (227KB, 1074x510px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1074x510px

>>132252543
Lol exactly. Now all the sudden these right wing retards are supporting Based Bill Clinton and Obama's tax policies. Maybe these morons should vote in their interests for once and vote Democrat.

>>132234671

i hope this happens, and more than that, I hope it works.

File: 1483558493407.jpg (40KB, 842x479px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 842x479px

>>132251857
>rewarded for being a loser
We're not talking about giving out welfare here. This is about tax cuts.

The bottom 50% pay less than 3% of all income tax revenue. You could entirely scrap taxes entirely for the bottom 50% - the majority of workers - and raise the taxes on the rest by about 3% and balance the budget.

If you're earning more than half a million dollars a year, a 3% rise will feel like a mosquito bite. If you're working a normal job and raising a family, having to pay no taxes would be a godsend.

Why would a small-government person be against eliminating taxes for half of Americans while still balancing the budget?

>>132236463
I like the way you think.
Like if all the healthcare bill ends up being is another subsidy to the insurance companies or tax cut for the rich without:
>giving healthcare for the majority of Americans
>setting up a system where the majority of Americans can reasonably and affordable buy their own healthcare
Then they get punished where it counts:their wallets

File: trickledowneconomics2.jpg (123KB, 700x651px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 700x651px

>>132252620
This is how you've been cucked by the trickle down meme for 40 years you good little goy.

You save $50 while billionaires save millions.

Why do you spend your entire life and dedicate your entire ideology to fighting for tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires? Answer that bitch.

Why not just cut taxes for those making under $100k?

Part 2 — Billionaire Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/

>>132250732

>windfall
>keeping your own money

>>132252671
Voting democrat in 2016 would mean voting Clinton, Hillary.

And that was impossible task if you had knowledge of Wikileaks documents, Libya or Benghazi.

>>132252604
Money is just a tool for trade and trade can exist outside of money. The fact that people like you seem to think that only by mindlessly spending it does it benefit anyone is why we live in an era with enormous debt and frequent boom/busts. Wealth is not static, money not spent is not money absent. Keynesian economics are fucking stupid as are the people who practice it

>>132234671
Bannon is Trumps chief strategist. And strategically, its a home run. The left's "arguments" against tax cuts would be soundly disabled. That said, 40% is still way too fucking high. Nobody should be paying that much in taxes in a supposed "free market" system and it doesn't actually address the core reasons for massive wealth inequality. The populist sentiment of "making the rich pay" can be dealt with in more effective ways. Go after the corrupt financial institutions, parasitic (((bankers))), and people/companies that made their fortunes exploiting globalist trade policy

>>132252587
Those disprove nothing. We have a real life experiment of how the 1% advance humanity -- the USA versus Europe or the USA versus the USSR.

The middle is useful as long as it has purchaisng power and consumes. But otherwise, they are mostly brainless sheep that need to be told what to do or work as wage slaves.

Only the 1% create true wealth and innovation. Stop that and you stop human advancement. This is why socialism is so devious and must be destroyed in any form. Bannon must be fired if the report is true and not a bluff on Bannon's part. I hope he's smarter than this.

File: 93 GORILLION_MRW.gif (3MB, 377x372px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 377x372px

ITT: RIGHT WING RETARDS BILLIONAIRE GLOBALIST SUPERKEK GOP ESTABLISHMENT SHILLS FIGHTING FOR TAX CUTS FOR GEORGE SOROS!

You can't make this shit up.

>>132251155
my god the left's cartoons are fucking boring

File: 1440969171995.png (17KB, 329x349px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 329x349px

>>132234671

>not wanting to tax the rich

temporarily disgraced millionaire detected

why do the dumbest of plebs believe low taxes for the wealthy help them?

File: obama tax hikes.png (658KB, 1019x706px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1019x706px

Why is Bannon suddenly advocating Obama's tax plan? Taxing the 1%?

>>132252849
You're still ignoring that all income brackets got a cut. Why do you seem to want to keep ignoring this part? Everyone means that the people you don't like got included too

ITT: lolbergs and ancaps defending their jew masters

Never thought I'd see the day where I would like the commies more in this thread

File: trumptards irl4.jpg (45KB, 488x352px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 488x352px

>>132253041
cause it trickles down!

>>132252907
>. The fact that people like you seem to think that only by mindlessly spending it does it benefit anyone
Well, Marx considered all work productive on its own. Its ony logical that such influential thought would spread to other aspects of economy.

File: stalin.jpg (11KB, 298x359px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 298x359px

>>132234671
>Only taxing the rich

>>132236295
This.

>>132253041
I believe in low taxes for everyone. No one deserves to have to pay a higher rate or a lower rate. Its not your money

File: gop cant economy10.jpg (52KB, 800x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 800x400px

>>132253076
You're ignoring everything I write and you just keep repeating yourself.

Why is your entire ideology based on blowing up the budget deficit to give massive tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires? You are the definition of a cuck.

Why do you think millionaires and billionaires need tax breaks?

Why not just cut taxes for those making under $100k?

Part 2 — Billionaire Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/

>>132248659

>>132234671
No one mentions that this cuts loopholes down 90% so they will actually pay 15% for multinational corps vs the 35%(read 0%) they pay now.
I, for one, fully support this.

>>132253140
Marx was also a fucking idiot and by his logic digging a hole in the muddle of nowhere had intrinsic value that had to be compensated

File: mitch nascar.jpg (31KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x300px

>>132253327
Guess what happens next. They don't get rid of the loopholes.

>>132234671

I propose that everyone who wants to pay higher taxes may pay but everyone who doesn't may not.

What's wrong about that? Clearly plenty lefty millionaires want to raise taxes on themselves so I say let them.

File: thr_bernie_sanders_spike_lee_20160331_sanders_lee_1257.jpg (192KB, 1296x730px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1296x730px

TAX THE MILLIONARES AND BILLIONARES THE ONE PERCENT CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!!!

>>132253213

i support a flat tax.

the same percentage no matter how much you make and no matter how you make it. investments income, self-employed income, and salaried income ought to be taxed at the same rate.

It's sad how many of you are falling for the devious socialist narrative of punishing the 1% and true innovators. The lower 90% do nothing for the advancement of humanity.

Tax the rich and you destroy what makes America
great.

>>132253404
Yes. And that retarded thought spread over other aspects of economy.


Well, thank God that economy is religion and is kept up by pure faith and not logic or maths.

File: OBAMA LEAF OUT1.gif (4MB, 480x342px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x342px

g2g i have shit to do

i see u right wingers are more cucked than ever for your billionaire globalist overlords

>>132253518
>doubled the debt of U.S.

Why did Obama do this

File: please feed me dicks.jpg (647KB, 942x1317px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 942x1317px

>>132253518

>when you're your own worst enemy

>>132253268
You're ignoring my point just to carry on with your childish jealousy. It was a tax cut for everyone and it benefited no one unfairly. And you keep talking as if only wealthy people paid fewer taxes when the reality is that everyone did because that's what should happen in a fair and equal society

File: Reagantripleddebt.jpg (202KB, 600x446px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 600x446px

>>132253607
he didn't

you're thinking of reagan

>>132234671
Don't be a fucking punkass cucksurvative.
The 1% are fucking pigs and sheep like you want to keep it that way because much black and white partisanship.

>>132252671
>>132252543

Vote for my economic interests? Are you guys on crack? Read my OP.
I didn't say this would be good for everyone, hell I don't think it will. I don't think this is a good idea because it'll entitle me to gibs, it won't.
I like it because it hurts The Jews. Period.

>>132238967
Nobody(*) makes >$1m a year in W-2 income.
The bulk of "bankers'" compensation is from bonus which will always(*) be structured as deferred compensation / stock schemes so they're long term capital gains rather than ordinary income.

A super tax on ordinary income over $1m might catch medium sized family businesses trading as S-corps, but no(*) "bankers".

t. used to get paid a stupid amount in W-2 form for reasons and consequently paid enough in Medicare taxes (no cap) to send a geriatric to the moon.

>>132253425
Given what has happens to far, i would expect a lower tax rate with no loopholes than that.

File: trump tax cuts37 billionaires need tax cuts bait.png (284KB, 1343x842px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1343x842px

bye now

>>132253669
why did you cut out obama

>>132253472
We're taxed too often for too many things as it is. There should be one flat tax for each level, fed, state, and city

File: 1497041911447.jpg (68KB, 450x629px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 450x629px

>>132239755
>>132239703
>>132238967
>>132236295
It's amazing how quickly /pol/ can change positions as soon as they hear news of there white nationalist friends pushing for it too.

Fuck the Koch brothers, they're just as bad as Soros. Tax the .1% like we were under Reagan. No reason why all our wealth should be allocated to a few people. Our high GDP doesn't mean shit when half our nation is on or below the borderline of poverty.

>>132253482
Are you still waiting for it to trickle down too?

Fuck the rich. They're mostly kikes. Squeeze them for all they're worth.

>>132234671
Nationalist socialism

>Tax the (((rich)))
>Use that money to invest in the middle class

File: Special-Forces-Dmitry-Kolosov.jpg (17KB, 261x195px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 261x195px

>>132240710
You actually believe your own b/s?
Americans..you really earned that president, hope you learn something.

File: defense-spending-and-gdp.gif (14KB, 750x340px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 750x340px

>>132248659
What is "peace dividend"?

>>132234671
What's up with all these unnecessary bold text and bullet points?
Is that because this generation cannot read an article straight up any other way or something?

>>132241159
So why not only put less taxes on small-business CEO's and cardiologists specifically like holy shit

>>132252907
>Money is just a tool for trade and trade can exist outside of money

And? Whats that have to do with anything? When i say money just replace it with 'resource control vote' if you want

The idea is that certain people are given more control over societies collective resource (everyone owns one equal fraction of the planet, civilization exists so we can more efficiently use that) because they are able to more wisely use it.

If they are not actually wisely using it, if their actions are not actually being done with the intention of strengthening the collective, then they are thieves.

>>132234671
i actually like that as a distributist

>>132234671
Why do you defend rich people when you yourself will never be rich? Why do you vote against your own interests?

>>132252543
Bill Clinton's surplus was the result of the Republican congress spending and the .com bubble. People give him credit for something he had no hand in too much

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON45 budget surplus clinton arrow reagam.png (166KB, 1169x452px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1169x452px

>>132253958
lol see >>132252671

If your argument is that Republicans cut taxes on the rich then waste trillions on wars and military, well then you're making my argument.

Also, the failure of Republican national security on 9/11 is not your argument. It's mine.

inb4 dindu

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993

Previously the top individual tax rate of 31% applied to all income over $51,900. The Act created a new bracket of 36% for income above $115,000, and 39.6% for income above $250,000.[2]
Previously, corporate income above $335,000 was taxed at 34%. The Act created new brackets of 35% for income from $10 million to $15 million, 38% for income from $15 million to $18.33 million, and 35% for income above $18.33 million.[3]
The 2.9% Medicare tax had previously been capped to apply to only the first $135,000 of income. The cap was removed.
Transportation fuels taxes were raised by 4.3 cents per gallon.
The portion of Social Security benefits subject to income taxes was raised from 50% to 85%.[4]
The phaseout of the personal exemption and the limit on itemized deductions were permanently extended.
The AMT tax rate was increased from 24% to tiered rates of 26% and 28%.[5]
Part IV Section 14131: Expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit and added inflation adjustments.

>>132252948
>Only the 1% create true wealth and innovation.
Wealth and innovation tends to come from people among the top 1%, that is not the same as saying that the people in the 1% by virtue of being there are inherently more innovative.

A byproduct of not having the same worries the rest have. Failure is the best teacher, being able to fail and try again leads to better more skilled individuals. When someone with out this luxury has to decide what to do, they get locked into worrying more about their own survival, which leads to a life of playing it safe and not innovating.

With proper social safety nets we would unlock the innovative potential of the other 99%

>>132254105
Why are you such a faggot?

>>132254105
Why do you presume to know what my interests are? Have you ever stopped to think that we're not jealous children concerned about someone else's money?

>>132253861

Retard socialist. It trickles down in the long term in terms of innovation and technology. But that should not matter -- why do you want it to trickle down? Why do the 90% deserve anything more than what the market decides? They are mostly sheep that need to be told what to do as workers. The 1%, by definition, are more deserving of wealth because of their driving innovation in the economy.

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON15.jpg (73KB, 602x399px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 602x399px

really leaving now bye shills

>>132234671
If you think this is new for Bannon, you're an idiot. You obviously have paid no attention to what Bannon has actually said over the years and only know what the propaganda media has told you, so you can shill on the interwebs.

>>132242280
Well I dont, full accelerationism. How else can we bring down the state?

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON39 gop squanders.jpg (112KB, 594x440px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 594x440px

>>132254113
Lol the GOP Congress had nothing to do with the Clinton surplus. It was because of Clinton's tax hikes on the rich. >>132252671
Republicans pissed away the Clinton surplus the moment they could under Bush. After Clinton warned them not to.

>>132254242
>>132254183

>>132254231
Uh no. Europe is trying this an failing miserably. The fact is all people are not equal. The 1% deserve their status.

>>132237165
Anarchism is naturally incompatible with everything. It is only ever a transition phase. Anarchocapitalism is designed to allow the (((wealthy elite))) to band together and take from the idiots who think (((they'll))) reciprocate on the NAP.

It is a means by which the wealthy would like to control all property and individuals. Communism under a different name. The rules will only apply to the little people, as they do now. And within a few short decades the remaining ancaps who've yet to be executed might finally realize their ideology was merely used as an excuse and launchpad for totalitarian dictatorships.

File: 1498341448889.jpg (73KB, 653x653px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 653x653px

>>132254012
Poorfag NEET detected

>>132254105
Because he understands economics much better than you.
>The most talented in society should KEEP the money they earned, as they are best able to determine where its maximum utility lies
>Somehow against the poors best interest
>The poor would be better if all money was stolen and given to them personally

File: 2 OF THE ALL TIME GREATS!4.jpg (938KB, 3355x2237px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 3355x2237px

>>132254183
>Previously the top individual tax rate of 31% applied to all income over $51,900. The Act created a new bracket of 36% for income above $115,000, and 39.6% for income above $250,000.[2]

wew sounds like Bannon is a fan of Clinton and Obama

bye bye

>>132253404
>complain people are lazy and not working
>they decide to take some initiative and go out and dig some holes where it seems holes need digging
>refuse to pay them
>refuse to employ them to dig holes where you want them to dig
>just complain about it all day
>complain when they decide to dig holes in you for being an asshole.

>>132253948
You type like an edgelord faggot

>>132248520
>the (((globalists))) are evil!
>NOO DON'T TAX THE (((GLOBALISTS)))
t. /pol/

File: 1467044575547.jpg (42KB, 562x490px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 562x490px

>>132234671

>>132240015
That's because you don't think for yourself. You just believe lies that corrupt leaders, like under investigation Bernie, have told you.

>>132254378
>Europe is trying this an failing miserably.
Thats because they are a bunch of retards worrying about the distribution of wealth and not the distribution of security

>The 1% deserve their status.
Some do, some dont.

>>132254593
Raising tax rates affects all incomes

File: trumpjew1.png (279KB, 499x496px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 499x496px

>>132254593
really makes you think

>>132253213
But it's everyone's money. The whole point of money is to be spent and redistributed. Dumbasses keep thinking money is worth more than it is and hoard it which just causes problems. And your money isn't privately owned, it's why courts can order you to pay monetary damages to a plaintiff, you can be fined, civil forfeiture, it's why counterfeiting is illegal, etc. It's only your "property" cause the state says so.

>>132254241
>Limited money supply
>1% owns 90% of the money supply and they desire more.

This will work well.

Greed is a natural human reaction but it never goes away. this is why the trickle down will never work more and those who have will never want for more like the masses will. Im not saying dish it out with out effort but much of it could go to much better projects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYNVNhB-m0o

>>132254715
Not when you only raise them on the top tax bracket you absolute fucking cuck >>132248520


You have no clue how tax brackets work do you?

>obama leaf absolutely butthurt about taxes being raised on porky because it hurts his narrative
DELICOUS

>>132254365
>Bill Clinton tax hikes
>Congress passes tax laws, President only signs or vetos them

Pick one, faggot.

>>132248659
Taxing the rich is literally nationalist socialism
Yet all the newfag republicuck facebook moms that found /pol/ last year are defending the (((globalists)))

>>132254183
My argument is that Clinton was an economically illiterate fuck-tard who had the great good fortune to be in office when the results of Reagan's victory in the Cold War started to come online.

Being also a geo-politically illiterate fuck-tard, he cut defence spending too far, too fast and in the wrong places, leaving Bush to inherit jihadism.

Bush being every kind of fuck-tard just dug every kind of hole deeper.

Naive static analysis of the kind exemplified by your charts is the kind of thinking that leads to the election of cunts like Trudeau by goldfish-brained cunts like leafs.

>>132254365
Congress controls all budget spending you idiot, not to mention that Clinton's tax rate failed to secure it's rates. Most of his surplus was the result of a bubble and his adjustments to entitlement spending

>>132254378
Lol the 1% deserve to be eradicated and their bloodlines purged. But we will take taxes instead, just stop starving the poor and working middle class fathers to death so they have no energy for parenting their son.

>>132254695
Your ideas have merit perhaps in the far future where we can genetically engineer society to be more productive.

But today the 1% are the drivers of innovation. Without them humanity stagnates. The 90-99% are simply second-handers and takers instead of the Makers.

>>132236295
This. Neocuckservatives are retarded and never had america's best intrest in mind. What faggot OP fails to understand as well is that not only is bannon trying to empower the middle class in a totally non radical way and is the only non cucked political activist leading the charge against islam

>>132254784
What the fuck? You are a fucking retard. Get in a time machine, go back and tell Sam Adams and the other Founders that socialist bullshit, then enjoy the tar and feathering.

>>132253838
There needs to be sanity in the system.

Having the wealth so concentrated isn't good for the nation, isn't good for stability - economic or otherwise. It undermines democracy and drags us towards totalitarianism as the few with so much power and influence begin seeing themselves as kings, not citizens.

Lower taxes on the middle class
Lower corporate taxes
Increase taxes on the <1%

>>132253838
Nah, you're a pathetic jealous little bitch who is envious of the rich.

go die in a ditch somewhere.

>>132254869
No I'm not. I'm just accurately predicting that this is not going to happen. But I love how all you cucks are basically admitting that Trump and the GOP's tax plans favor the 1% which is why u shills all support them.

File: 1993 omnibus2.png (63KB, 590x360px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 590x360px

>>132254890
Go look up how many Republicans voted for that bill you fucking nimrod

>>132255145
Then what if it happens, leaf?
What then?
Will you finally fucking kill yourself and stop shilling for that fucking nigger?

>>132254715
The effect it has on a poor person is maybe skipping one meal, the effect is has on a rich person is the money required to do massive public improvements.

Im willing to suffer some if it means the country is stronger, and stable, and eternal, thus ensuring i will always have a country to ensure i dont suffer too much.

The greedy rich think if the country collapses they just move to a new one.

Some of the most important and significant members of the 1% in american history went bankrupt doing their part ill remind you. America would not even have existed if one man did not personally finance the revolution while congress failed to do anything meaningful, he lost a lot of money doing that.

The 1% are there so they can lose all that wealth when its needed by their nation. Nobody improved america by making a fortune, only by making fortunes, and then losing them.

File: trump tax cuts32.jpg (67KB, 800x504px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 800x504px

>>132254911
DELET THIS

>>132249468
>people trusted Trump
Here's an article written in 2013 by TRUMP HIMSELF: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/22/business/opinion-donald-trump-europe/

>>132254438
Some of us might be pushing farther than what we would be happy with. Minarchism would be fine with me.

Also to think monopolies don't violate the nap is retarded. Also current currency would not exist or be circulated by shitty fractional reserve banking as it violates the nap

>>132254784
It's not everyone's money, it's merely a facilitator of trade, that's why multiple currencies exist and why none have the exact value. Its purpose is to simplify the purchase of goods and services. You can be fined by the court but they don't tell you what currency you have to pay in.

File: waffelkike.jpg (13KB, 285x214px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 285x214px

>>132236295
Zis

>>132255340

https://archive.is/JtiJ5

>>132255120
10/10 argument mate
Keep up the great work!

File: ct-steve-bannon-trump-national-security-council-20170130.jpg (402KB, 2048x1359px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 2048x1359px

HERO AMONG THE FILTH

>>132254113
The Republicans didn't come to power in Congress until the 3rd year of his presidency and they knew he could veto any bill they passed reducing taxes and they didn't even have the manpower to override a veto. The dot com bubble was the dot com bubble, totally independent of government policy at the time just like the stock market always has been.

>>132255235
so then the answer is just to all become debt slaves?

The problem with taxing the globalist is that their wealth is untaxable and they move around the money that is

>>132255054
>But today the 1% are the drivers of innovation. Without them humanity stagnates.
I agree. But using the economy as a measure, we stagnate, shrink, and then grow, repeat. No matter what we're going to go through recessions.
Why not take a chance on one that purges The Jews? We need a 1% that isn't actively trying to destroy our race and culture, there's only so much I can be expected to sellout for muh economy.

>>132249468
Good.

Punishing the 1% means an end of innovation in the US and stagnation like Europe. The 1% are the only true drivers of innovation and advancement of humanity.

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON.jpg (413KB, 1840x1549px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1840x1549px

>>132255010
>Congress controls all budget spending you idiot, not to mention that Clinton's tax rate failed to secure it's rates.

Holy shit you're fucking retarded >>132255187


>not to mention that Clinton's tax rate failed to secure it's rates.

wtf does this even mean

You don't even know how tax brackets work.

>>132254715
>>132254837

It was Bill Clinton's economic plan. How many Republicans voted for it? >>132255187

Republicans pissed away the Clinton surplus the moment they got the chance under Bush.

>>132255442
How do you get that from what i said?

>>132254837
It's obvious that you don't leaf. You seem to think income tax is the only tax that matters

>>132255506
Nigger, who pays you for this?
I want a job spamming graphs kek

File: aca repeal tax cuts5.png (375KB, 936x688px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 936x688px

>>132255223
Not gunna happen. You think Republicans are going to vote for raising taxes on the rich? LOL

Also, why isn't Bannon saying the same thing about OBamacare repeal which is going to take healthcare away from poor old white rural retards in Appalachia to give massive tax breaks to the rich

>>132255442
We're already debt slaves

We're not talking about fixing the financial system however. These taxation proposals are still working within the debt-slave system, with the end goal of making it more livable and bearable for everyone within it.

The only ones who really benefit from debt-slavery are the central bankers and the families that own them. Everyone else - including the 1%, congressmen, business leaders, etc. etc. suffer to varying degrees under it, even if they don't realize it.

File: trump_economy_better_democrats.jpg (39KB, 620x395px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 620x395px

>>132255340
LOL

Trump used to be more honest before he started appealing to right wing retards

>>132250993
>Standard shill respomse to being called a shill.

Fuck you're all so obvious. Do you not realize we have your playbook?

So how do you tax people who basically own nation states? Like the Rothschilds, Rockefeller, Morgans, Soros, Queen, Putin among others.

>>132255621
But in a hypothetical situation where God forbid a nutjob leaf is wrong on the internet, will you finally end it all and leave forever?

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON16.jpg (455KB, 1024x666px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 1024x666px

>>132255561
No actually I've pointed out that Trump is repealing the estate tax which literally only affects the top 0.3% >>132250732


inb4 farmer meme


you're a joke. u got btfo

just stop

you actually don't know how tax brackets work

>>132254715
>>132254837

hillary tax hikes on rich>>132248520

I actually g2g I'll catch u tards later

File: 1459998501256.jpg (128KB, 900x576px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 900x576px

>>132255713
He wasn't wrong

>>132255497
This was true of the old aristocracy, peasants rose up and we cut off all their heads, some people took their old position, then forgot about the true significance of what happened.

The security of the position is what drives innovation.

There are plenty of extremely rich people who do absolute fuck all but spend their money and live shallow lives. The innovation comes from the people who use their security to pursue their interests and do what they want to do, with passion, instead of what they have to do to survive.

Passion for what you are doing is what makes you do that thing well.

The goal of society should be to ensure everyone is able to peruse their interest with passion, that will create the most innovation.

The enlightenment was basically driven by people shitposting at each other about natural philosophy party tricks

File: steve-bannon-donald-trump-cabinet-person-of-year-time-magazine.jpg (38KB, 419x559px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 419x559px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sxTbfeYdO0

>>132255187
Yes, and the House passed it, not Clinton made it law. Also, the idiocy that you think the tax increases during his administration were what got the economy going is utterly laughable.

File: aca repeal2.png (105KB, 938x981px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 938x981px

>>132255901
Once Republicans repeal Obamacare (if they do) then I will already proven right since its repeal is a massive tax break on the rich.

Part 2 — Billionaire Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/

>>132255818
You don't.
You do what the nazis did, send in right wing squads to seize their assets (rothschilds got btfo by hitler btw). These people don't have rights, they are for all intents of purposes, competing nations, just ones hidden and dishonest. You declare war on globalists.

File: demswaymorejobs.jpg (114KB, 475x263px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 475x263px

>>132255939
you're god damn right pirate bro

>>132234671
I'm old. It's not Bannon. Once upon a time Trump proposed a one time tax on billionaires. That would have wiped our national debt. What happened? Jews.

>>132234671
based bannon

File: 1993 omnibus6 quotes.png (405KB, 728x815px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 728x815px

>>132256058
>Yes, and the House passed it,

The Democratic House.

>not Clinton made it law.

He did make it law actually. LOL you retards have no fucking clue about how your own country works.

Like I said it was his economic plan >>132255187

Republicans said it would fail and collapse the economy >>132252671

As always they were wrong then they tried to take credit when it succeeded.

Read these quotes bitch.

Obama Leaf out

>>132256069
Oh far leftist Buffet says something and a leaf acts like it is gospel, surprise, surprise.

>>132248520
>DEMOCRATS NEVER EVER LIE DEMOCRATS ARE LITERALLY ANGELS I AM BRAINWASHED TO BELIEVE THAT MY SIDE OF A SHITTY TWO PARTY SYSTEM IS ALWAYS RIGHT

>>132253820
>>132253472
But the wealth disparity is too great for it to work, no where near enough revenue would come from that.
>>132255365
That's cause countries all agreed on exchange rates. That doesn't change the fact you can be ordered to pay in currency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock
>>132255108
Just lol, the founders were inspired by Thomas Paine who wrote things like this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine#Agrarian_Justice
Here's Thomas Jefferson on taxation:
>I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind… Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise.
~ Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, October 28, 1785

Trump supporters who are crying about this are fucking stupid.
He said clearly in the campaign that he was open to the idea of raising taxes on the wealthy. If you consider yourself a nationalist of any breed, then you should also be open to the idea of taxing (((intellectuals))), (((bankers))) and (((media personalities))) who are all actively trying to erode the US's identity and national sovereignty.

>>132234671

Interesting. Can't wait to see /pol/ pull a full 180 on their usual GOP/antitax dicksucking.

File: 8818929_p0.jpg (894KB, 2543x1750px) Image search: [Google]

894KB, 2543x1750px

>>132255548
Truthfully, logic ab absurdum.

Keeping the rich rich would possibly lead to more public infrastructure and more efficiency in that but the reality is that most people currently just rev up their bonus to brag to their other friends.

On a longer timeline the currently situation would lead to a direct plutocracy instead of an indirect one.

>>132255686
True, also this would be on income and not total assets so it wouldn't suck the wealth like most people think it would, simply pull more from the income of most corporations (what this proposal is really targeting) meaning that companies that already hire 1000+ people might have to slow hiring. that might be the largest effect but small business would boom under it giving more people over all, and those that dont have to deal with affirmative action.

File: 1490124079279m.jpg (122KB, 628x1024px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 628x1024px

>>132256139
>presidents make jobs
Will you ever learn?

>>132255941
Your idea sounds plausible but not all people are created equal. And most people are lazy. If you did something meme like basic income, most people would not be innovative and the GDP would decline because the lazy fucks would stop working or doing what they're told.

Sure, there are dumb 1%-ers who inherited their wealth, but they usually squander it within a generation or two. Out of their ashes a new 1% rises.

Creative destruction.

The 1% are the true heroes of humanity.

>>132234671
Kvetching Jews BTFO. 100% in support

>>132256407
IF you are nationalist you should be also open to contributing to the nation through taxes

b-b-bad goy

>>132234671
Trump raising taxes on the rich would be an incredible move right now, to cement him as a man of the people.

He can say something about: our inner cities are in a terrible situation, and for a limited time until we can sort these problems out, we need the rich to step up and contribute extra. It would be applauded massively and BTFO leftists worldwide.

>>132255120

>t. effeminate trust fund babby who lives with mommy in a gated community

Sad!

Get a job you fudgepacking queer.

File: bff.jpg (106KB, 717x500px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 717x500px

>>132256363
>>132252223

>>132253838
>Fortysix percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a threebedroom house with oneandahalf baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
>Seventysix percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, 30 years ago, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
>Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded. More than twothirds have more than two rooms per person.
>The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)
>Nearly threequarters of poor households own a car; 30 percent own two or more cars.
Ninetyseven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
>Seventyeight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
>Seventythree percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a third have an automatic dishwasher.
Yeah, the poor in America are really suffering because of a few billionaires who won't buy them a 3rd HD television

Theres nothing more right wing then taking down the One Jewcent.

File: leafcuck.png (151KB, 731x1034px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 731x1034px

>>132255506
Lol obama leaf. Autistic poster.

>>132252004
16D CHESS

>>132234671
"You know a lot of these people got into politics to make money but because of the tax hikes on the wealthy that I made, I pay more in taxes now then before I was president. The media keeps saying I should have my head examined, well in this case they might be right."
2020 confirmed.

>>132253041
>why do the dumbest of plebs believe low taxes for the wealthy help them?
because it does
capitalists creating more wealth helps erryone (eg more things to get bought, hence more things to make, ie more jobs)
while poor people with moneyz just buy the dumbest shit (eg gibs to fucktards so they can buy more meth)

don't believe it trickles down enough?
a good thing, and a good reason why, you're poor.

>>132252671
Obama lead stop it the (((central bankers)))created obama and spent him out of a Great Depression. Do you really think that George bush didn't know what was coming? Do you really think the partisan two party system is real? Do you actually believe democrats care about the 90% white middle class and think it's actually in their interest, you believe this?

>>132256828

can you point to some sources where he defended and/or advocated for tax cuts? because if you cant, your little meme is full of shit

>>132257206
Get out of your cuckshed, and back up your argument

https://qz.com/429487/a-new-imf-study-debunks-trickle-down-economics/

>>132256295
No, the President doesn't make law, faggot. Congress makes laws, the Executive approves or can veto.

Interesting to note, two years after these tax laws, which you state were so amazingly effective at getting the economy going, Republicans won the House. Seems strange that such a thing would happen when the economy was doing so well. Not to mention the best economic years of the Clinton presidency were 1994 and later, meaning with a Republican House.

>>132257405
>imf
nice socialist cesspit you got there
now go get your hands cut off, you fucking leaf

>>132257405
>linking IMF "studies"

kek

>>132256407
He was going lower the overall rate, just close loopholes. The point is that it's not your.money, you aren't entitled to it and where do you draw the line? Things like this progress downward and all at the whim of a jealous fuck who doesn't like the idea of someone having more money than him. I don't want to be rich but I hate people who feel entitled and are jealous of what belongs to others and that attitude spreads the more its appeased. There are rich assholes to be sure but only corrupt gains should be stripped.

>>132257405
Trump isn't a trickle down economics type. for every tax raised if Hillary became president a loophole would be added.(((central bankers))) propped up obama with low interest rates spent him out of Great Depression. Just stop obama leaf your nigger sucked.

File: 116368260.eM5hCJfg.NorthKoreaAug09518.jpg (135KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 600x400px

>>132257501
>>132257561
ancaps out

>>132256363
You're the cucks fighting for his tax breaks.

>>132256496
>Your idea sounds plausible but not all people are created equal.

Thats true of everyone though, including the current 1%

When we have people getting jobs these days, that involve going to work and sitting on facebook and maybe doing a half hours work, how many jobs do we really need?

And if we started streamlining all that, eliminating the jobs we did not need, how many service jobs, how much infrastructure maintenance, construction, general upkeep, would no longer be required? How much less would be required to maintain and support those jobs? And those?

How many jobs would society really need, right now, if we streamlined it all?

Combine that with automation.

Now at this point you might argue we would be better off then taking all those freed up people and giving them other, new, jobs. I dont know, maybe that would be the smarter idea, but what if we just cut everyone's hours? 1 day work week?

Remember the same amount of actual final productivity is being done, its just been streamlined, so everyone could keep the same pay.

And if people spent their free time how they wanted, most would sit around watching TV, but not all of them. If it wouldn't cost us more in the long run, why isn't it worth the tiny percent of people who would innovate something that comes out of that?

My main critisizm is people have conflated the ideas of job, work, and worth. There seems to be this idea that people need to work to justify themselves, even if they didnt, even if now or a century from now or a thousand years from now they didnt, we have to make up things for them to do to justify themselves, we cant let them just enjoy the prosperity and efficiency of civilization.

I dont know what the real picture is, how things would distill down if we tried today, how far we could get, but thats not my issue, my issue is with the view that it would be bad if we could, that a lot of /pol/ seems to share.

File: THXOBAMA15.8millionjobsDecember2016.jpg (315KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1280x720px

>>132256365
Obama and Clinton both raised taxes on the rich as well and the economy soared.

>>132256942
JESUS, I never knew we were so retarded.

Is there such thing as leaf-guilt?

>>132256377
Thomas Paine, who wrote a couple pamphlets and was never involved in governing, and Thomas Jefferson, the writer of the Declaration who also had no part in forming the government. For crying out loud, there was NO income tax until the 20th Century.

>>132257753
Bernie would have definitely taxed the rich, but unfortunately, he got cucked out of the nomination by a lying hag.
:^)

>>132257676
Nazbol tells ancaps to leave cause an International Monetary Fund study is distrusted cause it's trying to disprove a horrible economic system that is also controlled by (((them)))

>>132257753
>aeconomy soaring under obvama

ldoass ad what

File: obama_economy13.jpg (52KB, 625x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 625x400px

>>132256481
Republicans called it the Obama economy. Now you're trying to take credit for it? You really are degenerates