Which slavic language is most complicated ? I mean rules, conjugations

stop meddling in our elections!!!!!!

File: 1480045003118.jpg (3MB, 4342x2816px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4342x2816px

Russki is pretty hard, as a Slavic speaker I have a decent amount of understanding of it and have talked to a lot of Russians lately. If you get serious about it - I think it's the hardest Slavic.

>>132218778
Bulgarian was the original Slav language. Polish is Bulgarian without any vowels and Russian is Bulgarian with too many vowels

>>132219034
really? thats interesting

File: 1491795344553.jpg (118KB, 700x393px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 700x393px

>>132219034

Was it? BULGAR was a Turkic language, when we came and ooga boogad the blondies on the Balkans we took their language. Then invented Cyrillic and here we are.

>>132220689
kek, Bulga means Volga iydk

>>132220772
oy vey seems not sorry

File: 1473528810461.jpg (100KB, 861x825px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 861x825px

>>132220772

That's some folk etymology right here.

>The etymology of the ethnonym Bulgar is not completely understood and difficult to trace back earlier than the 4th century AD.[19][20] Since the work of Wilhelm Tomaschek (1873),[21] it is generally said to be derived from the Common Turkic bulğha, bulga- or bulya ("to mix"; "to become mixed"), which with the consonant suffix -r implies a noun meaning "mixed".[22][23] Other scholars have added that bulğha might also imply "stir", "disturb", "confuse".[24][25] and Talat Tekin interpreted bulgar as the verb form "mixing" (i.e. rather than the noun "mixed").[21] Both Gyula Németh and Peter Benjamin Golden initially advocated the "mixed race" theory, but later, like Paul Pelliot,[26] considered that "to incite", "rebel", or "to produce a state of disorder", i.e. the "disturbers",[27][28][29][25]

Rather go with this.
We are the original jimmy rustlers.

Polish. Not using the Cyrillic alphabet was a really bad choice. There is a mess of conjugation/declension rules and the pronunciation is completely fucked up because the words don't sound like they look.

Russian has the same grammatical structure but the alphabet has simplified most of the issues that arise in Polish.

The South Slav languages would be very difficult because there is no real reason to learn them and finding one would be a challenge in itself.

Lithuanian is closer to sanscrit than polish with the additions under and above the letters ie: į, ę, ą, ų, ė, ū, ž

File: 1492188857072.png (181KB, 528x4464px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 528x4464px

>>132221145
>Not using the Cyrillic alphabet was a really bad choice

I agree here. Also the Serbian identity crisis for switching off Cyrillic lmao.

Post slavic memes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPeYvkhydPQ

For some reason all slavic languages (All of them except Bulgarian, I think) have these retarded declinations, which complicate shit.

That being said, it's probably Polish, since they've got a load of Donut Steel original content letters.

>>132221145
>because the words don't sound like they look.
Says the fucking english speaker.

File: pronunciation.jpg (51KB, 600x413px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x413px

>>132221145
>words don't sound like they look
>t. Anglo

>>132218881
stop meddling in our erections!!!!!!!

>>132222262
my high school english teacher used to say: you write smith but you read jones

>>132221145
>words don't sound like they look
>try to rhyme cough, rough, though and through
> pony and bologna does rhyme
>wtf
Lol dude, Polish is almost completly phonetic

>>132220689
You are not bulgars, idiot. Genetically, you are thracians mixed with slavs/vlachs.

>>132218778
How hard is czech to learn?

File: i-dunno-lol_1_.jpg (56KB, 604x443px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 604x443px

>>132224704
ask poles

>>132224488
I didn't design English, why are you holding me accountable?

>completly phonetic

If you are a native speaker, you'd think it makes complete sense. I think English makes complete sense even though you clearly think it doesn't.

If you are learning, then you haven't gone far enough to see it yet. There are voiced/unvoiced letters, vowels that have different sounds based on the next letter and so on. It's really not fun.

>>132224704
It's Polish with more diacritics.

If you are serious about learning it, you have to move there and just practice. Slavic languages are just too fucking difficult to put together on paper, you have to just play it by ear with set sentences changing a few words until you have a feel for them.

>>132218778
It depends from where you stand.

Being Russian, Polish is the easiest, you don't even need to learn it.

South Slavic and Czech languages are as foreign as any others.

>>132224704
We don't learn czech since adding -ek to any polish word effectively makes czechs understand us.

>>132218778
>I heard Polish most closer to Sanskrit
no all the european languages are just latin if you gave a illiterate person a book in latin and told them to make a language

there is nothing even remotely similar to sanskrit in ANY european language. what you said is as bad as saying i heard spanish is similar to cuneiform. which as soon as you move past both being written languages the similarities stop there

I speak Ukrainian (not fluently), but Polish seems to be the hardest. They literally have like 25 variations of a word for some things. Imagine having 18 ways of saying 'two'. That, and Poles sound like they are speaking so fucking fast.

>>132227117
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptDVaVlw9m4
think twice burger

>>132218778

Lithuanian is closer to Sanskrit than Polish.

File: indoeuropeanlanguages.png (253KB, 1280x635px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1280x635px

>>132227117

>there is nothing even remotely similar to sanskrit in ANY european language.

You fucking idiot, there are MANY similarities to Sanskrit in ALL European languages. Here are some similarities between Sanskrit and Italian (for example): 'Sarpah' means 'serpent' in Sanskrit and 'serpe' means 'serpent' in Italian, 'sapta' means 'seven' in Sanskrit and 'sette' means 'seven' in Italian and 'nava' means 'nine' in Sanskrit while 'nove' means 'nine' in Italian. Don't talk about shit you know nothing about, Americoon.

>>132221347
>go to mother vagina

never gets old

>>132229656
what the fuck
this is a fucking small world

>>132230027

Two words: 'Chariot' and 'colonialism'.

>>132218778
Belorussian should be the easiest one since it's just russian but everything is written as it sounds
I almost get a stroke from laughing at any sentence in belorussian

>>132218778
>Which slavic language is most complicated ?

probably russian as no only would you have to learn another langauge but also another alphabeth the cyrilic one.

>>132221145

>Polish. Not using the Cyrillic alphabet was a really bad choice. There is a mess of conjugation/declension rules and the pronunciation is completely fucked up because the words don't sound like they look.

Hello, you are fucking stupid.

Unlike in English you don't need to know what a word sounds like in Polish to read it for the first time and pronounce it perfectly.

Everything sounds EXACTLY as it is written, you just need to know what sounds the letters represent.

>>132225493
>There are voiced/unvoiced letters, vowels that have different sounds based on the next letter and so on.

The fuck are you on about? Everything sounds exactly the same in every situation.

Ok, maybe stuff like "cz" which is the same as "ch" in English, but that's it.

>>132224633
Sorry, but we wuz Khans n sheeit, and therefore not white.