Would /pol/ be okay with gays if they weren't prancing around

>>132113506
Far more ok with, but it's still degenerate.

>>132113506

Yes love is love

But also having been sexually harassed by several gay bosses, I'm not enthusiastic to work with anyone

>>132113506
I literally don't give a shit what gay people do so long as they do it out of my sight and therefore out of my mind.

File: 1453899138956.jpg (155KB, 780x840px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 780x840px

>>132113506
>>132114076
>>132114464
>>132114617

>>132113506

yes, obviously.

>>132114617
>no greentext featuring copious amounts of santorum

>>132113506
I dunno what to think - you see the photos of gay rights demonstration back in the 1960s - they were mostly quiet, well-dressed, bookish types - and they solmenly asked for respect.
Then you see the screaming, purple-haired freaks nowadays - FFS.
The orignal gay rights people had ONE THING going them that has been cast to the winds by today's "progressives": DIGNITY.
FWIW I don't think they should be allowed to adopt kids or work as PE teachers (or anywhere with nude kids).

>>132118841

Hey Croatia I was being sincere way to perpetuate toxic 20th century mentalities by thinking men are immune to harassment

Gays are like niggers. One or two "good" ones by themselves might be ok, but a big enough group always devolves into a fruitfest (chimpout).

>>132113506
no

>>132113506
No.

Why should my children pay for elderly faggots' retirement.

At least this way they die young.

>>132122515
That's because it used to be about actual gay people asking for equal rights, now the LGBTXYLMNOP movement has been co-opted by marxists, just like liberalism, feminism, video games, marvel comics, the news media, ect. Their goal is different, to destroy western civilization, or "White supremacist capitalist patriarchy". They aren't fighting for equal rights, they're trying to meme a revolution.