Why do Europeans have tons of parties and we only have two that

we have a tributary system in the US, political thought from smaller groups gets adapted and used for the propoganda purposes of larger groups. The problem is the Jews control the larger groups, so the smaller groups with the valid, correct ideas don't get their ideas snuffed out or manipulated so far from their original construction that it becomes double-speak. Conservatives touts free-markets, but what they are really about is increased cronyism. The left supports things like "equal opportunity", but they are a trojan horse for marxist subversion. More political parties that matter is the better system because it prevents political thought from being corrupted by the larger controlling bodies.

File: IMG_1628.jpg (149KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1024x768px

Not a fan of EUROPE on most things but the multiparty system is better. But 2 house congress is better than parliament. (Keep in mind the two party system isn't in the constitution, you can have a third party)

>>132051202
The constitution doesn't guarantee two party but the way the EC is setup with 270 to win, you'll only ever have two main competing parties for presidential elections. The electoral college is a huge deterrent for a multi party system but It also serves its purpose quite well as we saw in the last election.

>>132050379
>owl
>dude weed lmao
> a fucking elephant
> a fucking donkey
>dude leafs lmao
>commies x2
such great choices for you murifags

Whig Party is fucking based

Why are they no longer in prominence while retard libertarians are

>>132052624
forgot to add
>muh mcNaptm

>>132052251

It has nothing to do with the electoral college. If anything independents and third parties have gotten far further in the electoral college than anywhere else. Just look at Ross Perot.

>serves its purpose quite well

Its purpose was to take the election of the president out of the hands of direct voting. The states did away with that on their own by assigning electors based on direct, democratic processes. All it does now is distort the vote and disenfranchise vast segments of the country (i.e. your vote in Tennessee, whether for the GOP or Dems, is virtually worthless, same with your vote in New York). It's a seriously retarded system. If we don't want to have electors elect the president, a desire expressed by the way states now select and pledge electors, then we should do away with the college entirely.

What did you think the purpose of the electoral college was, exactly? Don't even try to tell me it's about "protecting small states". That's the Senate. The number of electors is entirely based on population.