Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: sven.jpg.9900dcfa4cf301d3c4ad43c171fbe953.jpg (86KB, 651x886px) Image search:
[Google]
86KB, 651x886px
Is Sven Olov Lindholm the ultimate redpill?
"We had the opinion that, the true nationalism, the love for the fatherland never could be a sustainable societal foundation without the workers cooperation.
Alike that socialism, a tightly organised and orderly society, founded on social justice and equal right to all, must be a necessary term to achieve a strong and happy fatherland.
Nationalism and socialism are in fact not incompatible conflicts but the same - two sides of the same love for the people.
The disgust the 'working class' felt for everything nationalist was because that this word had been monopolised by a arrogant upper class and a self confident, conservative bourgeoisie - it was thought only compatibale with capitalism and militarism.
We wanted to get rid of this discrediting, wanted to mobilise the healthy nationalist from the masses of the people.
And everything that stood in the way, every wrong, unfair and distorted i the old system must therefore begone. Instead of the old bourgeoisie class nationalism we wanted to create the working peoples fatherland."
>>
File: DCCMFZxXcAEMwjg.jpg (78KB, 952x556px) Image search:
[Google]
78KB, 952x556px
However, there is a second possibility: one may conceive a realistic view and a struggle against the bourgeois spirit, individualism, and false idealism that is more radical than the struggle waged against them by the Left, and yet oriented upward, not downward. As I have said in a previous chapter, this different possibility is contingent upon a revival of the heroic and aristocratic values when they are assumed naturally and clearly, without rhetoric or pomposity: in retrospect, typical aspects of the Roman and Germanic-Roman world have already exemplified it. It is possible to keep a distance from everything that has only a human and especially subjectivist character; to feel contempt for bourgeois conformism and its petty selfishness and moralism; to embody the style of an impersonal activity; to prefer what is essential and real in a higher sense, free from the trappings of sentimentalism and from pseudo-intellectual super-structures—and yet all this must be done remaining upright, feeling the presence in life of that which leads beyond life, drawing from it precise norms of behavior and action.
Everything that is antibourgeois in this sense does not converge toward the communist world; on the contrary, it is the premise for the emergence of new men and leaders, capable of erecting true barriers against global subversion, in correspondence with the establishment of a new climate, one that will be endowed with its own unique expressions even in terms of culture and civilization
>>
>>132002224
I wouldn't say "ultimate" but he had the right idea
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2