How can leftists deny the law that "ultimately only the

File: images.jpg (5KB, 299x169px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 299x169px

How can leftists deny the law that "ultimately only the strong surivive". Observing how nature is so cruel to the weak in order to pass along the strong genes has been a red pill that is unavoidable. It really shows that the idea of hierarchies exist and they are ingrained in our nature. And most importantly, it exists for a reason. It prevents the downfall of societies becoming weak. Meanwhile, leftists somehow think we can move past the ugly side of nature. Why is that?

If it isn't arguably, why don't we start red pilling lefties on the nature of the real world in the animal kingdom? Ever notice it is always the most selfish and isolated individuals who haven't worked a day in their life that advocate for communist/socialist societies? Their existence is due to the benefit of the strong caring after their weakness. So why not get them to realize it? If the cause is isolation, lets redpill them on the law that gives justification to capitlaism. There needs to be an understadning of the primitive to understand that we aren't so different.
carful not to overdoes into the black pill with theses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQn1-mLkIHw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQq93Q2txrs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSDHpPZB9Ng