Do you reckon the Crown will get more involved with politics

Yes I hope they do. This tradition bullshit of staying out of political affairs is hurting the commonwealth.

They are necessary for restoring faith and morality of the people.

I would like to see nothing more than a strong royal family leading the restoration of the commonwealth to its former strength.

It was all downhill after Waterloo in my opinion. I think we should invade France again to restore national unity and deport anyone not ethnically european from europe.

>>131813659

What say you William? I think Charles should abdicate to his son, provided William leads a crushing reconquest.

>>131815000
I think the English Civil War and the not so Glorious Revolution were the worst things to happen in English history and it should be completely reversed. Like the traitor Cromwell said, an absolute parliament is as tyrannical as an absolute monarchy, and the former is clearly what we have now.

>>131815474

The monarch still has absolute power, it is just customary not to wield it.

I think the monarch should only be active in foreign policy and major domestic issues, and as an ideological figurehead. This allows control over the major direction, but still allows the people a large degree of control over their everyday lives.

My family have died for King and Empire for hundreds of years. I was told I was not what the NZDF was looking for. Feels bad man.

>>131816725
>I think the monarch should only be active in foreign policy and major domestic issues, and as an ideological figurehead. This allows control over the major direction, but still allows the people a large degree of control over their everyday lives.

I should add, the monarch should be active in parliament more and introduce legislation to vote on.