Red pill me Which is best and why is it superior to the others.

>>131741732
Ability to buy buy your nuke

>>131741732
Idk, a mongolian crayon painting website would be the last place I would get first hand info about ideologies

>>131741732
Communism = little food and poor conditions
NatSoc = great living conditions but people will probably start a war against you, or embargo you
Facism = not so sure, haven't really read up on it

>>131741732
Same shit, different colours.

>>131742361
I've always seen fascism as war politics. It mobilizes the people and the industry very well to go against a common enemy. It's a ideology of order that shows amazing results in the short term.

>>131743129
short term? does fascism not work long term?

>Rules: no low quality b-tier 'redpill me on x' threads

>First thread: im a newfag, redpill me on x.

You have to go back

File: 1436886708411.jpg (74KB, 737x758px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 737x758px

Communism is more extreme and has caused more misery and death but isn't outlawed for some reason.

>>131741732
They're all fucking dumb dude. They're all responsible for millions of deaths and worldwide blind hatred for another person. None of these are good options. We need a social democracy where we receive proportional representation in a trusted governing body, and when that body is no longer trusted, we have an election and vote for new ideas.

All of those people Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Chavez, Castro, Mao, Kims, are the complete opposite. All of those systems require complete government control to be implemented because the common people do not fucking want that and don't want to feel like their voices aren't heard. Those systems pander to elites and the lowest common denominator as much as the Democrat party now does in the United States. Where the fuck do you think they learned it?

>>131741732
fascism translates as corporatocracy.

>>131743168
It really hasn't been tested for a long period

Libertarianism is best, but human nature forbids it from manifesting, whether through bad and irresponsible/undutiful people, or people trying to govern others even when its unnecessary but seems like the intuitive thing to do. The next best thing is conservatism, which attempts to keep conditions in place that allow liberty and prosperous social conditions. All of liberalism really misses the point by having no real practical backbone to keep society based, and allows far too many bad ideas in with little inhibition and rigorous thought.

National socialism is essentially left wing, but tried to appeal to the right wing. Hitler was an excellent deceiver. He rejected all traditional institutions and wanted to return to the way of the jungle.