Prove to me why an absolute monarchy isn't the best form

Protip: sage

>>131712269
I can't, you win.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfHrMnl1uLo

>Monarch surrounded by free resources in a low-threat environment
>Becomes an r-strategist
>Embraces leftist delusions
>No one can challenge power

>>131712797
>Southerner
fucking retard

>>131712797
But popularity is an unofficial check on the Monarch's powers. If the monarch knows his people are very unhappy with him, that could mean revolution.

>>131713218

>If the monarch knows his people are very unhappy with him, that could mean revolution.

If revolution improves the state of the government then obviously it wasn't the best form.

File: download (30).jpg (14KB, 308x164px)

14KB, 308x164px

>>131712269
Jews infulitrate the monachy as court advisors and have done so throughout history since when they first came to europe.
Just take a look at the many monarchs and royal blood lines who have fell for jewish tricks throughout time.
>Hapsburgs
>Kaiser Wilhelm II (pic related)
>the British monarchy
The list goes on.

Not to mention how monarchies spread into empires and assaliminate all their subjects under the same banner, only to be left to the perils of the intermingling of cultures.
>cultures are destroyed.
>heritage is thrown aside.
>race mixing is indirectly encouraged.
>nationalist miltia movements grow against monarchists resulting in unneceary deaths.
>third worlders are exploited and later down the line bite us on the arse by asking for reperations, citizenship and gibmedats.

Its a terrible sytem...
now an ethno-non expansionist monarchy without kikes and any of the abrhamic religions, now your talking!