> van jones starts climbing twitter trending
> "edited video"
can you believe these fucking shills?
>>131687127
I-it's an e-edited clip out of c-context
>>131687127
I am on the opposite side of Van Jones when it comes to politics, but I wanted to thank him. As one of the most well respected people in his party he just screwed the democrats badly.
>>131687127
He posted this on his Twitter 2 days before the PV vid was even recorded
https://mobile.twitter.com/VanJones68/status/878363356939157504/video/1
>>131688675
>https://mobile.twitter.com/VanJones68/status/878363356939157504/video/1
nothing will come of it != it's nothing
>>131689120
He openly admitted this on his own fucking Twitter BEFORE the undercover video was even recorded, you guys are acting like he got busted
>>131689435
That's my take away from hearing that too. People are piling on Van Jones but he is trying to drop hints in that video that the Russian collusion us bullshit. I think the angle to play is to sort of side with Van Jones and make his point known.
>>131687127
jack and twitter are easily the worst social media service and ceo. The blatant efforts to silence any story or idea that is critical to democrats is immediately censored and replaced with friendly propaganda to attempt to control the narrative. The blue check mark shills peddle narratives and twitter supports it fully. Disgusting.
>>131690671
Worse than kikebook? I'm not on kikebook so I wouldn't know.
>>131690164
True but /pol/ would rather ignore this and just say "hurr durr Van Jones got caught out"
>>131687127
Ridiculous. Lol