When shit hits the fan and WW3 / full societal breakdown starts,

File: US_Navy_SEALs_with_laser_designator_closeup.jpg (971KB, 1775x1196px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 1775x1196px

>>131669157
endurance, but not to the point of the nigger on the left. You should go for whatever navy seals/green berets commandos go for, because that's what works after 5 days of no food and constant trekking.

>>131669157
BRAINS YOU STUPID FUCKER!

>>131669157
Depends. But the type of a man that can beat 2 of these in their respective areas is a man that trains both.

Do you want to get gang raped by 49 muslims for 6 hours and then decapitated, or would you rather kill 3 of the muslims, then get gang raped by the rest for 8 hours and then decapitated

>>131669157
Both are useful, that's why populations tend to have genes letting individuals specialize in both. You don't really need more training than being able to hump about 80 lbs. for 5 miles a day, for a week or so. It's unlikely in a survival situation you'd be doing anything more extreme than that. Focus on practical skills, basic fitness, not iron man style training; prepare your mind to survive on tiny amount, to go without. Mental toughness is king in survival.

>>131669791
Underrated

>>131669791
Good question!

File: 1497501274593.gif (2MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x202px

>>131669372
>this
/thread

>>131669157
Both. You need to be strong and be able to run for a long time.
>>131669372
this

>>131669372
>idiot SEAL pretending to use an LTD
lmaoing at his life

>>131669372
This, fpbp
Having lots of mass means you need more food

>>131669157
If we're really getting down to it, muscular endurance over muscular strength. If/When war breaks out, it doesn't matter much if you can bench 600 over 650, but it matters a shit ton if you can go another mile or not before needing a break.

By that, I mean, train distance, and train it with carrying weight. No one really understands just how much shit most military groups have you carrying. There's a difference between jogging, and jogging with forty pounds or so on your back, with shit moving with you. Load up a backpack or something else, and get used to jogging like that.
>>131669372
But yeah, this. You want some fat on your bones, and some muscle. Just being able to run won't be useful.

>>131669157

Prob endurance given that's what most military train for

>>131669458
This and guns, but you still need to be in good shape. People will follow and respect the guy on the righ a lot more than the guy on the left though.

>Hit the bag like its a muslim
>then run for a while
>run back to bag
>throw bag on floor ground and pound
>sprint away and hard as you can until you're tired

>>131672378
>good shape
Not really, many cunts with glocks shoot better than fit morons with desert eagle.
You need supplies, keep the troops jacked up on supplements and on high rotation so they don't get exhausted.

FUCK RESPECT, THEY SHOULD PRAY TO A NEW RELIGION, KILLER RELIGION!
You need your troops to be mean and like a bunch of murderous hornets.

The goal is more kills, not to build a good role model in society.

A mixture of both. You want to be able to carry heavy things long distances with a body mass you don't need 4000 calories a day to maintain. People on /pol/ have this horrific, damaging delusion that being 250lb muscular giganiggers will make them superior, even though there's no practical use to being that large.

You want to find a middle ground. Lift weights, but also go for high intensity and long distance runs on a semi-regular basis.

>>131672744

Don't forget about demoralize.

Get a cheap megaphone and announce to the bag that your bullets are cloaked in pig's blood and any of their dead will be buried face down in a pit filled with pig guts