How does the Russia thing end, is it going to be like Watergate

>>131661097
Someone is going to have to find some proof, or it's all fake news.
Zero proof exists, or he'd be charged.
It's all just a big exist to waste taxpayer money. Look at the Clinton email investigation. She destroyed evidence and lied under oath, serious charges that resulted in nothing.
This will be the same.

File: IMG_0223.png (474KB, 427x583px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 427x583px

>>131661097
They'll peddle if for years with zero actual proof until nobody cares anymore. Watergate was an actual big thing, but the narrative they've been pushing down are throats is noting but conspiracy-tier garbage

>>131661520

There is a fair amount of evidence that his team spoke to Russian officials, nothing illegal in that however Trump certainly obstructed Comey's investigation.

>>131661719
Trump saying he hoped Comey would let Flynn go isn't obstruction. Liberals have even abandoned the obstruction nonsense because it hasn't panned out yet.

File: howard_the_duck.jpg (225KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1920x1040px

>>131661097
You took the bait and began comparing the "Russia scandal" to Watergate.