Is the constitution open to interpretation?
Is a left/right leaning reading the result of human bias?
Would you support an logic-based AI to render constitutional judgement?
>>131431801
Basing your nation on a document written 100 or more years ago without being able to adjust it's interpetation is like trying to walk with your knees locked.
You should totally do it
>>131431801
It literally is under the "living document" jewish pilpul bullshit.
>>131434169
>Basing your nation on a document written 100 or more years ago without being able to adjust it's interpetation
What is a constitutional amendment?
The judiciary doesn't have the power to change the laws of the country you slimy kike.
Today the constitution means X, tomorrow the constitution means Y. That's called subversion of the law.
>>131434555
>What is a constitutional amendment?
We should ammend the 2nd ammendment make it clear with Republitards and NRA shills that the founding fathers did not consider Cletus McDumbfuck having an AR15 as a "well regulated militia".
>>131434845
Yea exactly, you gun grabbing faggot. If you want my guns, change the constitution.