When it comes to free speech, you want people to be able to speak

>>131359273
One is one effective than the other

>>131359273
great fuckin thread

real almond activator

>>131359273
Free speech is specifically about any controversial political speech being unobstructed, because either you can say anything or you can say only what (((elites))) allow you. There are no in-betweens, there are no compromises.
Your Founding Fathers were quite smart guys and managed to foresee almost all future problems. Still didn't expect that their posterity would be _this_ retarded.

>>131359273
Free speech simply means the government cannot prevent you from expressing your ideas by legal force.

What you say in public still has social consequences and always will.

For example, you won't go to jail for self-publishing a book about how niggers are subhumans, but you probably won't find anyone willing to sell it...

>>131359273
>A white guy goes around defending the white race against all the bullshit the internet and social media portrays against him.
Sounds right. Everyone should have right to defend their people.

>he was just going around screaming in every nonwhite's faces about how he's persecuted?
People who pretend to be a victim to feel good about themselves have no honour. But they still have their right to do so.

File: 1496939196911.jpg (81KB, 639x619px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 639x619px

>>131360284
came here to post this

>attack by free speeck
Hey fuck you!

Did it hurt? Do you pull a gun on the guy?
Or call the thought police?