while most Snopes.com entries that reach a 'FALSE' conclusion provide sound arguments to disprove radical claims, the Pizzagate entry amounts to nothing more than a strawman. Compare:
http://www.snopes.com/alien-mummy-peru/
>uses actual evidence to discount the bullshit
>cites verifiable instances of Gaia's past fuckery to show that it's bullshit
>the article, summarily, is sufficient to disprove the notion that Gaia has any sort of credibility whatsoever
http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/
>little to no evidence cited, emotive / weighted language everywhere
>uses (obviously biased) Alefantis quotes as its main ""citation""
>mentions the infographics about Pizzagate, but doesn't show them (why? because they're too convincing!)
>>131274782
>Most Snopes entries provide sound arguments
lel gr8 b8 m8