Thread replies: 2
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 17854751_1392686550811207_4918018085556100790_o.jpg (100KB, 720x576px) Image search:
[Google]
100KB, 720x576px
A question for /noguns/ people.
Certainly the state has a mandate on violence, since the threat of violence is the most efficient way of enforcing the rules imposed by the state; but why should the state have a monopoly on violence, given that an armed citizenry with a self-defense law in place is more efficient than what you find in most European countries?
>>
>>131227670
The state wants a monopoly on violence, just like the founders of my country wanted the people to have a monopoly on violence, which failed, and then the constitution was created which gave it balance all the way until fdr
Thread posts: 2
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1