Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Think about it.
Throughout history how did European tribes unite to form solid countries? You look at England, and back in history, there was not this one big country called England. It was split up into multiple sections dominated by different kings and queens and groups of people. It wasn't until they all unified, is when they formed what we now know as England and the rest is history.
Go down any other country and it'll be the same thing.
So with that being said, couldn't you also make an argument that for us to unify, we as all Americans have to join together, get rid of the blockades and identity politics bullshit?
White Americans used to be fragmented with German Americans, italian-americans, French Americans, etc etc until Theodore Roosevelt come along and just said that we need to get rid of the hyphenated bullshit and become just American.
On the minority side, they have to get rid of the hyphenated African-American, Hispanic American, muslim-american, Asian American.
And on our side, the white side, we have to be one hundred percent accepted into intermixing and what have you as well.
Prove me wrong
>>
Interesting post. Too bad no one will be able to read it in 50 years since it's not in spanish.
>>
>>131182377
>whites got over their inter-white differences in the past so that's basically precedent to remove distinction between Europeans and Sub-Saharan Africans right?
t. Shitskin / Kike / Idiot Liberal
>>
>>131182377
War
/thread
>>
>>131182780
It has to be seen in the same way as people from Northern England being okay with people from Southern England getting together
Strictly anything less and we won't achieve homogenous harmony
>>
>>131183046
Yeah man the distinction between two geographically separated members of the same Northern European ethnic group interbreeding vs a European breeding with a shitskin is basically inconsequential. Bulletproof reasoning my Semitic friend
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1