Why is it called a "Refugee Crisis" if refugees are a net benefit to society?
"Crisis" implies both urgency and a moral obligation to act.
Because rape and disorder aren't a net benefit
>>131179372
the people calling it a crisis are not the same people as the ones claiming that refugees are a benefit.
there are 7,000,000,000 people in the world. they do not all have identical opinions about everything. go outside and talk to some - you'll see.
>>131179372
Refugee implies they are refugees and not parasitic economic migrants leeching welfare from the state and taxpayers. Net benefit implies that 75% of them won't be on that welfare for life and will actually integrate, learn the language, and get a fucking job. Net benefit =/= economic and cultural suicide.
>>131179372
it's a crisis for the refugees, who face terrorism from white supremacists
Woah. Made me think.
>>131179372
What the fuck. I love refugees now.
>>131179372
OP is also a faggot
>>131179372
>if refugees are a net benefit to society?
And when has that ever happened? Or are you confusing refugees with immigraten?
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-number-of-migrants-claiming-benefits-in-germany-surges-by-169-percent-2016-9?IR=T
https://www.rt.com/news/372466-germany-migrant-welfare-fraud/
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/05/11/half-million-asylum-seekers-german-welfare-handouts/
http://www.nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/02/19/german-economy-immigration/
https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/germany-statistics-show-majority-of-muslim-refugees-will-never-work/
If you unironically believe that "refugees" from 3rd world countries, subhuman degenerates thant can't even read or write in their own language are a net benefit in any way, then you should considert killing yourself. Even the normal turkish immigrants from the 60s and 70s to Germany were not able to create a net benefit in the long run. By now, they took up more welfare than benefits created.
>>131179372
They are a burden on the welfare system and contribute more crime. They are anything but a benefit.
>>131179372
Bump
>>131180321
there will huge benefit and very easily too but it will take right social reform policies.
>you can't allow them to create ghettos and have a constant watch on them.
>educate their children in local language & culture with mandatory education policies.
>creating job opportunities for them and linking the welfare to the no of job's they do.
>providing consultation services so that their needs could be understood and in turn influence them to understand local laws & culture.
constant bitching about how they're rapefugees without attempting to change them will only create ghettos with sandniggers who will do exactly what you expect of them.
>>131181250
>you can't allow them to create ghettos
We did that with the turks in the 60s and 70s. By 1990, they took up more welfare than they contributed.
>educate their children in local language & culture with mandatory education policies.
Done that, kids still became worse. 3rd generation muslim kids are actually more muslim than their parents.
>creating job opportunities for them and linking the welfare to the no of job's they do.
At least the welfare part is true. For the rest: there are lots of fucking job opportunities for decades for them, doesn't work. And now you import the 3rd world, one decade before automatization for 50% of all jobs set in, and they want job opportunities? People with IQ 70-85 well be on welfare forever.
>providing consultation services so that their needs could be understood and in turn influence them to understand local laws & culture.
How about they do this shit for themselfes? They are "grown up" people, not children you need to shove everything into the asshole.
You are a naive piece of shit.