Personally, I think looking at the label of "Social Justice Warrior" has somewhat of a hero and activist connotation. However, the people who are called "Social Justice Warrior" are not heroes or good activists. SJWs hurt society. Feminists, in particular, ruin society by advocating for women to be skanks, promoted and created a lopsided criminal justice system to hurt men and families, promotes divorce at the expense of a child's development and interests, promotes abortion, and commonly make the awful claim that fathers are not important for the son or daughters development.
To me, SJWs, are merely villains trying to corrupt society and the label "Social Libtard Whiner" is a more appropriate label for those evil doers. SJWs' biggest tactic is whining and playing the victim card in order to enact change and harass others.They are only evil, and an SJW may only take the term as a compliment for his or her ALLEGED or PERCIEVED heroism. However, they are only evil people. We need to call them something to more match their evil.
Just throw out the best labels, so we can unanimously agree to a label for the evil people.
You're sexually frustrated, got it.
The liberals and lefties I listen to have accepted "Social Justice Warrior" as a pejorative. They know the criticism is valid. Also you should not use slang like "libtard" IRL.
oh and Ross Perot and his legions of gibs geriactrics gave us the Clintons
>>131161511
We should think of new terminology then? I doubt they take SJW as an insult. You need to spend more time IRL. Also, I could get mad pussy if I wanted to, but then that would make me a degenerate.
>>131161714
Ross Perot was a legend by the way. If Ross Perot was President, Perot would have made America much better than any Eurocuckerean Country." Ross only seems crazy to stupid people like you.