Could it be that they're completely incapable of thinking for themselves and need "daddy" to sort things out?
Seems subhuman to me.
>>131115968
>says the guy that blindly follows the MSM narrative without ever questioning it
wew
sage
>>131115968
No, it's actually the most human thing you can do. See humans have things new thing animals and niggers don't have, which is "socialization". That's where people learn correct and incorrect behavior. I this fashion, we learn from those who came before us. Great leaders (scientists, politicians, businessmen, etc) all stand on the soldiers of giants and those that came before them.
What you are getting at, yes, is the inability to think for oneself. This mind is simple and to weak to handle complex thought and yes, wants Daddy to sort things out. That's either from 1) too much coddling 2) too much flouride that's also turning the fricken frogs gay 3) post modernism.
So no, it's not subhuman. Even the comment that "le /pol/ is dumb" is a human condition because 1) animals can't think and can't build society to engage in such feelings and 2) it's a result of institutional and informal forms of socialization.
>>131116135
Stop projecting
>>131116733
Agree with what you're saying. Great people should inspire, but no one person or a small group should be allowed hegemony in a state. Even if they somehow end up doing a good job, dictatorships are too restrictive, leading to stagnation and robs people of critical thinking skills. A nationalist society should be voluntary.