Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya, The Dharma Manifesto, Arktos Media

File: ganesha-001.jpg (517KB, 929x1200px) Image search: [Google]

517KB, 929x1200px

>>131080035
Conflict Theory is designed to contrive a falsely pronounce sense of "us" versus "them", of Black versus White, of proletariat versus middle calss, of female versus male, of Islam versus non-Islamic communities, of gay versus straight, of urban versus rural, and of young versus old. Indeed, many of the now commonly accepted categories and classes of the population are in themselves artifically concocted groupings that had no recognized existance previous to their direct creation by a small coteries of intellectually dishonest Marxist ideologues of the twentieth century. These concocted categories include the modern, invented groupings of "teenagers" (first used in America in 1941), "gays" (first coined for "homosexual" in 1971), various hyphenated protected groups ("African-Americans", Hispanic-Americans", etc), and "the homeless<" among a myriad of other recently conjured, and now politically recognized and privileged, "communities."

Abrahamist agitators employ this divisive tactic in order to artifically exacerbate the otherwise quite natural and reconcilable differences that are found among people, and to forcibly level such difference in a consciously and deliberately horizontal social fashion. It is the goal of Conflict Theory to replace natuarl differences, such as the natural harmony of vertical heirarchy, along with the inherent psycho-physical differnces that exists between people, with monotonous, enforced uniformity of thought, behavious, and social outcome. Conflict Theory is a via negativa predicated upon the destruction of all time-honored and universally acknowledged standards of reality, not the creation of any recognizable positive reality.

>cont.

File: 220px-Nepal,_ganesha,_xviii_sec.jpg (27KB, 220x296px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 220x296px

>>131080257
Abrahamist agitators employ this divisive tactic in order to artifically exacerbate the otherwise quite natural and reconcilable differences that are found among people, and to forcibly level such difference in a consciously and deliberately horizontal social fashion. It is the goal of Conflict Theory to replace natuarl differences, such as the natural harmony of vertical heirarchy, along with the inherent psycho-physical differnces that exists between people, with monotonous, enforced uniformity of thought, behavious, and social outcome. Conflict Theory is a via negativa predicated upon the destruction of all time-honored and universally acknowledged standards of reality, not the creation of any recognizable positive reality.

Perhaps the starkest and most prevelant example of Conlfict Theory that has wrought havoc upon the mdoern era has been the ersatz philosophy of Marxism. Marxism marks a sharp departure from the ealier forms of Abrahamist Conflict Theory in several ways. Marxism attempted to take this root essence of Abrahamic philosphical-praxis that I call Conflict Theory and transform it into an exacting "science" of social change with pseudo-philosophical aspirations. Moreover, unlike the three previous incarnations of Abrahamism (Judaism, mainstream Christianity and Islam), Marxism rids itself of any spiritual pretense whatsoever, and openly declares itself an atheistic movement.

File: 201503_ac001.jpg (178KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 600x800px

>>131080368
As the latter-day manifestation and most efficiently destructive form of Abrahamism, Marxism posits the notion that the "inevitable march of human history," as well as human "progress," happiness, evolution, and personal growth, is achieved through the mechanism of direct conflict - most especially class conflict. Marxism is specifically based upon the earlier Hegelian notion of thesis-antithesis-synthesis, specifically, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's (1770-1831) notion that historical prgression proceeded through a three-fold process of thesis (the current prevailing worldview), antithesis (the current thesis being confronted by a novel worldview), and synthesis (resulting in the reconciliation of both thesis and antithesis, and the creation of a new prevailing worldview, which then becomes the new thesis), as well as dialectical materialism. Conflict Theory, in all it's forms, is philosphically and practically the exact opposite of Dharma theory.

For Marxism, every element of Natural Law represents the thesis. The social envy and degeneration instigated by Marxism represents the antithesis. The synthesis is a new atheistic, Communist world order.

Though Conflict Theory finds the zenith of it's philosphical expression in the seemingly secular vehicle of Marxist thought, Conflict Theory forms the very heart of all Abrhamic ideologies, stretching back to and exemplified by Abraham himself. All forms of Abrahamisn emply a program of agitation of the masses as a violent tool for destructive, "progressive" religious and/or social change.

File: Theodoor_Rombouts_(1597-1637)_-_Prometheus_-_KMSK_Brussel_25-02-2011_12-45-49.jpg (3MB, 2628x1844px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2628x1844px

>>131080475
Historically, Judaism and Marxism have affected contrived mass agitation, riots and mob behavior through conspiratorial maniupulation of the more proletarian and benighted segments of various societies. Such voert behavior has been the primary methodology used by Abrahamists specifically throughout the advanced industrial nations of the West for the last century. Christianity and Islam, on the other hand, have employed the demographically manipulative method of increasing their numbers in the communities they occupy via a conversion to a numerically viable degree as to then safely overthrow the prevailing status quo of various traditionally non-Christian/non-Islamic societies. Once the Muslim populations of individual European nations reach a demographically viable point for the successful exertion of violent social pressure, for example, such anations will then be declared de facto Islamic nations by the leaders of the local Muslim populations.

>>131080035

Both follow and operate under Universal Law. However, in the Dharma Theory, it implies and neccessitates that everyone already understands universal law.

Conflict Theory arises when there are agents, or perhaps a single religious, idealistic, or material philosophy that goes against Universal Law; And by those means, those who wish to live in peace must commit acts of violence in order to bring about a greater good.


You can see it today in the form of Judaism, a single entity that has corrupted and polluted the world. There are ancient Atlantean recollections of a similar process that occurred before its fall, and a striking resemblance to what is about to occur.

In Atlantean days, there was a single group or religious entity that did the same thing that Jews are doing now, and all the world teamed together to destroy them once and for all.

Universal Law, and its teachers such as Jesus, Buddha, Hermes, Thoth or Krishna, all taught the same fundamental law throughout the ages. However, when the Jew killed his intended messenger because he was not satisfied with his messiah, it marked said religion to a fate of doom and peril; an inevitable unfoldment of cause and effect.

>tfw /pol/'s too dumb to get this thread

good shit

however I have to disagree and say there's just something about the western mind that balks at the establishment of a homeostatic society conducive to spiritual development, and that conflict theory was not so much consciously chosen and propagated as just a product of how we process the world. what I'm saying is: it's really hard for us to simply live in the world and focus on more transcendental pursuits instead of always progressing towards some goal in the empirical world, how do we break out of this cycle?

>>131081662

When the material world proves, or perhaps proves enough that there are forces beyond our comprehension.

Science has long reached this point, but materialistic Science refuses to let go of the reigns; that being, it will not be the savior of the human race, only a piece of its unfoldment.

>>131081962
So you're saying once we're reminded of how far nature exceeds our comprehension again we'll humble up? I agree but I don't see that happening without the total collapse of the system.

Can you, in your words, summarize what you believe to be the main tenets of the Law? I've studied Buddhism, Christianity, many religions and philosophies extensively but I'd like to hear how you describe their teachings

>>131081662
>>131081962
>>131080035
Here's an interesting book. They have a chapter devoted to the ancient European wall paintings, swastikas, yoga, warriors, and theorize that the ancient Europeans were much more spiritually advanced than we have been (((told))).

http://www.bamboo-delight.com/raxbiljo/Monsters_of_Babylon.pdf

>>131082996
I'm reading Revolt Against the Modern World where Evola implies that the evolutionist narrative of cavemen -> le rational modern man is just a naturalized myth of progress, and that in fact the opposite is true: modern man is the nadir of a progressive degeneration that began with the collapse of a primordial civilization of light and spirituality a long time ago, with the (((Jew))) pretty much representing that subversive, self-sabotaging element intrinsic to all ordered systems and the eternal enemy of the Aryan