TIS HAPPENING: Donald Trump considering military response against

>>130860982
haha

>anon journal

Breaking edge news of faggots.

>>130860982
and million of south Koreans will die.

Americans are truly retarded.

I'm not convinced

>>130861153
Who cares, on both counts

he's been "considering military action" since he took office. We're technically still at war with North Korea. Military options are always on the table.

Thats not how it works. Here is how you'll know if we are going to war with NK.

1. Sanctions on Chinese banks.
2. 5-6 naval fleets in the sea around NK.
3. China issueing warnings to US.
4. South Korea and Japan start evacuating.
5. US starts bombing.

>>130861153
Japan and South Korea are both expendable assets to the US and they know it. China will do anything to stop best korea from fucking it up beyond the point of no return because they know that it's a war they will most likely be dragged into that would result in a loss for everybody involved but would probably benefit the US most as they will now have the excuse to cancel trade with China and be able to restart heavy industry in the States, and the US will take almost no infrastructure damage, whereas korea, Japan, and the Chinese coastline will all be devastated.

>>130862309
>5-6 naval fleets in the sea around NK.
We almost half 50% of our in service carriers around NK as we speak.

nothings going to happen....china wont even increase sanctions.

>>130862917
Yeah, I know. I was trying to draw a correlation between aircraft carrier and how close a war is. Before Iraq we had six irc.

>>130862645
Might be a neat way of defaulting on our insane debt to china......Hmmmm

>>130862645

>Japan and SK are expendable to the US

Maybe if you're an isolationist-tier retard they are

>>130861648
It would be news if he said military options are off the table

File: 8_5591347[1].jpg (12KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 320x240px

>>130862309
>US starts bombing


then you need to send ground troops in...and even then you'll probably fuck it up like iraq and afghanistan.

from the bosnian war onwards we know that you cannot win a conflict with bombing alone. I don't think you have the stomach to commit ground troops

>>130860982
Yea, reading Trump's innocuous tweet earlier today, alluded to China working hard to keep everything under wraps, but it failed. He sounded as if the waiting stage is over.

>>130860982
>theanonjournal

>>130862309
this is what americans believe

>>130864917
nukes? its 2017 and all they probs have nukes with minimal fallout, or maybe secret space operational weapons might be something completely different from what we have seen so far