If the $25 million Democrats spent on John Ossof's campaign

>>130836183
Think of all those free abortions that could have taken place.

>>130836183
That's not how it works, stupid.

>>130836700
Explain.

>>130836183
I'm ok with planting the trees but none of the others.

>>130836183
>>12 million children's books for inner-city schoolchildren (Reading is Fundamental)
Lol do libturds actually think niggers read books?

>>130836975
He can't and probably won't.
>>130837008
Have some compassion for your former colonies papi. I'm hungry

File: 1494637435912.jpg (70KB, 505x490px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 505x490px

>>130836183
How many scoops could they have bought with the same money?

>>130836975
The money was spent on a campaign in a critical voter district in a state that can flip to either red or blue for 2020. His opponent spent a similar sum of money on the campaign. Money spent on the campaign does not vanish into thin air, but is paid to people who can do with it as they please, including donating to these efforts. A candidate's chance of winning is tied with how much money they spend, since people are stupid and form opinions by exposure. Ossof did not know beforehand that he would lose. Therefore, had he won, he would have had the opportunity to donate far more than that to those causes. That is why people spend money running for office rather than donating to charity up-front.

>>130837479
>. His opponent spent a similar sum of money on the campaign.
False. She spent less then 1/6 of what he spent

>>130837479
>a state that can flip to either red or blue for 2020.
wow, you fucks actually belive this?

they burned this money.

>>130837479
This is satire right. If corrupt Ossof would have won hewould have diverted taxpayer money to his friends while impoverishing the middle class further down shrinkening the gap between poverty and middle class. Then spun it as the poverty class gaining ground on the middle class. OP is correct. Democrats would never voluntarily spend their own money to help, but will be glad to spend other people's money till it runs out. KYS commie.

>>130837783
Handel spent about 24 million, Ossof spent 31 million, this includes both insider and special interest spending.
https://www.issueone.org/money-behind-expensive-u-s-house-race-history/

Yeah but then they couldnt have forced American citizens to pay for it

>>130836183
>donated to charity instead

Wow, thank god they didn't waste their money then

>throw more money at it, I'm sure it'll work this time
Smugtrump.jpg

>>130837990
Everyone argues what the opponent "would have" done had they won, and there are always accusations of diverting money towards their buddies in industry. You don't have any proof for this at all of course.
>Democrats would never voluntarily spend their own money to help, but will be glad to spend other people's money
Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this, but Republicans give more to charity on average. Still, that's not an argument, since working in government essentially involves spending other's tax money.

democrats cant find a 45 year old white male with a penis to run for president...

>>130837479

Her opponent spent 14% of what Ossof spent, and the Democrats are always crying about more money for the underprivileged.

File: 1496329043723.jpg (2MB, 936x7090px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 936x7090px

>>130837351
Nearly forgot about all the cheese pizza and hotdogs
Delish!

>>130836183
Bump

>>130837479
>Broken Windows Fallacy: The Post