Since the Democrats put so much time and money into this campaign,

>>130748765
> Incumbent

Incumbent vs. a penniless, no-name token opposition candidate ≠ Democratic candidate who raised $50 million and greatly outspent his opponent and had the entire national Democratic Party and DCCC behind him.

If Ossoff challenges incumbent Handel in the 2018 midterms, he'll lose by twenty points. No one is dumping all that money on him a second time.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (56KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1280x720px

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>130748765
Check the scoreboard. Almost winning doesn't count.

Yeah when you spend about 10x as much money as your opponent the race tends to tighten up

>>130748765
>Robert Montigel spent less than $1000
>Jon Ossoff spent $30,000,000

RMYT

This faggot spent $20 million dollars.

>>130748765
not really. they registered and bussed every minority in the district to the polls and still lost by 5 points

>>130748765

LLLOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

>20 million spent by Dems
>Republican wasn't incumbent
>Clinton won all the counties within that distinction

LMFAOOOOOO

>>130748765
In 2016 the Dem was outspent 2600-1

>>130748765

> 2014

use the 2016 election you fucking moron

>>130748765
You gotta realize that most Americans are stupid and believe whatever the MSM tells them. The Dems use this to get people to vote for them just based on the lies they tell the people about Trump being "racist" and "homophobic". I also bet not enough GOPers voted in this one also.

File: 1494024225331.jpg (62KB, 538x445px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 538x445px

WTF I THOUGHT DRUMPF WAS DOING SUCH A BAD JOB THAT EVERYONE WAS TURNING LEFT NO THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE