>the polls were right, because hillary clinton won the popular vote
is this revisionist history? I swear that most of the polls were measuring her electoral chances.
>The polls said hillary had a 98% of winning
>trump wins
>The polls were still right, we are just so retarded we thought the popular vote mattered....
Do you still trust a retarded person?
>>130593190
>>the polls were right, because hillary clinton won the popular vote
So if their polling is right how should we think of the LA Times Polling?
As super-right?
Uberight?
>>130593190
>is this revisionist history
Yes. The state polls also showed Hillary winning. Polls can't be wrong, because that would delegitimize the entire industry.
Yes they are wrong and Trump only won because muh Russia and also probably because of the mafia and possibly magic/voodoo
The polls were super right because if they were wrong that would mean the media and their narratives were completely flawed to the core which just isn't possible.
I know because I saw it on CNN and msnbc