>say that communism enforces equality, and equality cannot exist without the state, there for anarcho-communism cannot exist
>get banned on /leftypol/ for two weeks
"Open for debate", huh?
but we'll all just ignore basic human urges, instincts, and evolution and all get along!
wouldn't there by definition be inequality if there was a state though? unless literally everyone was a member of parliament or something
>>130495344
>wouldn't there by definition be inequality if there was a state though?
It depends if you define equality of opportunity or outcome.