>"The USS Fitzgerald, an anti-ballistic missile destroyer that was part of the USS Ronald Reagan carrier strike group, will no longer be ready to defend the carrier and other ships from missile attacks launched from North Korea, should push come to shove in the current confrontation with the rogue regime on the threshold of the capability to attack New York, Los Angeles, and our power grid with nuclear missiles."
What exactly happened here? How did a container ship manage to get within a 100 miles of this destroyer and not be pinged? You're telling me that a modern, state-of-the-art ship couldn't see this coming? Is this some sort of Titanic bullshit?
What are they hiding? Is this a shoe in the door for a potential missile attack?
I am curious too.
Were they playing chicken?
>>130445357
It didn't happen in open sea. It happened in a congested sea lane between Tokyo Bay and Yokosuka.
More importantly, is the US Navy now a weapon of the past?
>>130447804
Ten miles off shore is open sea, you dork
what if a NK cyber attack screwed with the ships radar or what not?
>>130446169
Female captain
>>130445357
The captain propably was a faggot disregarding the laws of navigation and got his ship wrecked out of incompetence.
>>130450287
>The captain propably was a faggot
Probably?
Navy?
Probably?
Navy?
Probably?