What makes a site like say, Breitbart less "credible"

>>130062248
nothing

fox news is fake too.

>>130062248
historicity

>>130062248
Literally nothing

If a site doesn't have a comments section, then it's not credible.

File: operation_mockingbird-cia_msm.jpg (52KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 380x380px

They don't have CIA agents working for them.

>>130062248
Breitbart is too white.

>>130062248
Breitbart is blatantly ideological and doesn't even attempt to be impartial.

>>130062710
No such thing.

>>130062248
Credentials acquired from different groups, e.g. press pass for white house. Basically an insider circle jerk

FAKE NEWS, SAD!

>>130062248
my fee fees

>>130062788
CNN does though, right?

>>130062788
This, CNN is subtle propaganda, but Breitbart can't even hide its true colors.

>>130062248
Not being owned by (((them)))

>>130062788
lol 9/10 articles are a listing of facts without commentary = biased

>>130062967
Subtle lol

>>130063116
They won't publish straight fake news, unlike Breitbart, but seriously, they really have a talent for manipulating the truth.

File: Cheeseburglar.gif (1MB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x188px

>>130062248
Everyone has an agenda, but CNN is straight up spook propaganda and you should've put a comma before the word say.. or is it after like? And is this another honeypot? Who knows. Enjoy some different chord progressions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MC4QCidHrs

File: breitbart-defy.png (25KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x700px

>>130062593
>This

Comments bring readers together to further discuss on their own what was presented in the article. It's like making art for an exhibit and not letting anyone critique it, for better or for worse.

>>130063455
You are hilarious. Keep it up.

>>130063455
You are fucking retarded to the max. CNN has literally been caught airing fake news constantly since its inception.

>>130062957
It does, doesn't mean it is though.
Breitbart is more ideological though.

>>130063960
>>130064009

I don't consider CNN any different than Breitbart, I check my news from the first source, it's always the best way to deal with the issue. News outlets have become trash.

>>130062788
CNN is every bit as ideological as Breitbart, but they're more trustworthy because they try to lie about it? How does that make sense?

>>130064206
lol my bad

>>130062248
Because the left calls lies truth and truth lies.

>>130064210
They're more trustworthy than Breitbart in the same way as bank robber is more trustworthy than a house burglar when you invite them over for dinner.

>>130062248
their broadcasters licence and the fact that they are on TV, which we now know is worthless.

File: IMG_0284.jpg (31KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x225px

Nothing pisses leftists off more than watching 19 year old kids getting rich off of investigative journalism while they are forced to do stories about who got blocked on Twitter.

>>130064539
That's some analogy. You're saying Breitbart is trying to rob my house, but CNN just wants to rob my bank?

The difference as I see it is that Breitbart at least admits they're burglars. They make no apologies for it. But CNN is pretending they're law abiding citizens when everyone knows they're thieves.

>>130065188
That's exactly right.

>>130062248
msnbc is credible ? when did this happen? why wasnt i told ?

this better be trolling. that rachael madow guy creeps me the fuck out

Paying ANTIFA to riot and harboring felons.
Bannons great though.

>>130062353
Really? How exactly?