Why do trumpanzees think making billionaires richer will make them rich?
>>130043026
in most western countries the same shit.
people are dumb, easy as that.
divide and conquer works very well, people fighting about non-issues too much, that is why trump won.
>>130043192
don't understand me wrong, hillary would have been a horrible choice too.
Nobody thinks that
>>130043026
SAGE HREAD
>>130043905
>implying Trickle Down Economics haven't been a thing in burgerland for decades
>>130043026
Sage Hide Report
>>130043026
Why do libtard democrats think taking wealth from one group and giving it to the lazy will improve the economy.... Ohh yeah cause then they can take from any group when needed once that precedent has been established as ok.
>>130045485
Adam Smith wrote about the necessity of a progressive tax system and the wealthy sharing a greater societal burden a hundred years before Marx.
He's known as the father of capitalism.
>>130046228
Sounds like a communist Jew.
>>130043026
You shills post this thread every day
>>130043026
Why do retards think that working for someone else will lead to financial fortune?
>>130043026
>haha republicans are so dumb, don't they realize that their lives are shit because of the things that democrats do?
This is your argument?
lol
>>130043026
So when are democrats going to end poverty? Any time now?
>>130043026
Here we go with this 1 post by this ID shit again.
Stop taking the obvious, repetitive, daily bait you mongs.
OP isn't reading a single thing you say. So who are you arguing with?
>>130043026
It's less to do with that then wanting to keep more of what they earn. Why would I want to pay more in taxes? Health insurance? Get that through my job. My taxes go to lazy niggers and stupid fucking government employees. Large scale govt employment(and SEIU) kill cities. It might be different if they invested and earned more than they pay out but they don't so they put their hands out for more. Govt is literally niggers
>>130046228
>t. Someone who has never read Wealth of Nations
>progressive tax
Taxing someone in proportion is called a flat tax, dipshit.
"It must always be remembered, however, that it is the luxurious and not the necessary expense of the inferior ranks of people that ought ever to be taxed"
Says we should tax the poor for buying unnecessary shit.
>>130047940
Maybe you should have read the preceding paragraphs.
>"The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state."
>"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich . . . . It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
>>130047314
doesn't have the same hook, line, and sinker when the dumb ass donkey is on there
>>130043026
It's almost as if you do the same thing.
>>130043026
>voting democrats when you're white cis male
>literally electing people that hate you and want to see you gone
>>130047081
No the argument is that republicans are so dumb they fail to realize that the reason their life is shit is because of other republicans.