Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 12-angry-men-pic-1.jpg (304KB, 1000x1869px) Image search:
[Google]
304KB, 1000x1869px
So I just watched this after seeing it in a /pol/ movies thread, and this wasn't /pol/ at all; it was the most bluepilled piece of shit I've ever seen.
>Initial SJW cuck Henry Fonda starts arguing about how the accused (18 year old who murdered his father) was brought up in a slum and his dad beat him up - which is irrelevant to whether he did or did not commit the crime, which is what he's being tried for.
>Initially everyone votes guilty because it's painfully obvious that he's guilty (and it remains painfully obvious despite all the emotional manipulation that Fonda and the cucks dish out on the people who maintain guilty positions).
>All the people who stick to guilty are revealed to just be racist or angry men who just want to punish some young criminal, and the jurors who are voting guilty do shit like, turn their backs on them to shame them and simply stare at them until they change their mind (no I'm not kidding, those are the tactics the movie tries to paint as sympathetic and rational).
>At one extremely reddit moment the secondary guilty voter says something like "these lowlife's doesn't even talk good english", before being corrected by the german next to him: "don't". Fucking uneducated bigots!
At the end of the day the fact remains that the kids abusive father was murdered with the exact same knife that he owned (a unique looking weapon, though not, as is revealed, one of a kind), which even the not guilty voters admit is a 1000-1 coincidence when totalled against the evidence, but they go ahead and emotionally blacklist everyone who sticks to guilty anyway because "muh reasonable doubt :^)
This actually sucked. Give me some real redpill movies please. /pol/ movies general. Yo and I'm not critiquing the film from a cinematic perspective; I'm sure it was groundbreaking in it's usage of angles and pacing, etc, etc; but, the content was crappy and bluepilled.
>>
>>130013524
>Initially everyone votes guilty because it's painfully obvious that he's guilty
WRONG
>>
>>130014421
Yes it is. How likely is it that the boy's abusive father would be murdered by an total stranger who just happened to have the exact same - very unique - knife?
Who else would have killed him? Was there a robbery attempt? No, it's never stated. Fonda and the cuck brigade have some okay points about witness reliability, but the fact of the knife means there's really very little reasonable doubt. All the witnesses agree, whether they're all 100% reliable or not.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1