The most important decision(s) a man can make is whether or not

>A neo Nazi

>Neo Nazism

>Neo Nazi

>>129911313
Do you want more people like you in the world? Do you want more people like your wife in the world? If yes to both, then have kids.

Cities have become playgrounds for the rich, so it's usually better to move to a cheaper suburb, accumulate wealth, and plan for your kids future.

File: I'm_fine.jpg (94KB, 601x508px)

94KB, 601x508px

>>129911313
> Yes, have kids, and lots of them
Many anons who argue for this position will cite biological imperative, saying that passing on and continuing your genetic lineage are the reason you exist. Other anons will point to the priceless emotional satisfaction of having kids, saying that you cannot truly understand love until you have married and had kids, and that if you wish to experience these superlative human experiences, it is necessary to have kids. Other anons will decry those who choose not to have kids as abdicating responsibility, and failing to fulfill their societal obligations, and that as citizens, we have a duty to create more tax payers in order to maintain the system. Most anons on /pol/ however, center their arguments on race and biology, arguing that white anons are in the midst of a demographic crisis, and that if we do not increase our numbers and proportion of the population, our way of life will deteriorate as third world immigrants will be incapable of maintaining our infrastructure and institutions.

>>129911926
Pretty much. If every family of a certain class or race suddenly started having 6 kids their numbers would immediately blow up in the next generation.

File: CranialSuperiorityFactor.jpg (57KB, 275x275px)

57KB, 275x275px

Atheists praise Darwin yet don't have many kids.
Do they not fully believe their sole goal in life is to spread their genetic code in accordance with Darwins theories?

They should have more kids than Mormons and Catholics if they believed their own theory.

File: 20170607_202457.jpg (166KB, 768x1024px)

166KB, 768x1024px

>>129911313
>ITT: arguments about whether or not to have kids
Deus Vult.
26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 29And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 31And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

>>129911313
>>129911926

Fuck, you are dumb.

File: Anger.jpg (6KB, 276x183px)

6KB, 276x183px

>>129911313
> No, do not have kids. Maybe don't even get married
Anons who advocate for this position will typically back up their argument with innumerable statistics for why one should be pessimistic about the world in which we live, arguing that our economy, environment, politicians, institutions and men/women have already degenerated past the point of saving, and therefore having children would merely be bringing more tax slaves into the system to be exploited, brain washed, subverted, and despised. Anons may also point out the inherent risks in having a family, typically centered around the possibility of divorce and the associated financial, emotional and psychological costs. Faced with a lack of reasons to uphold society, anons who take this position are typically proponents of various forms of escapism, cutting themselves loose from societal ties such as family, race, and religion in order to pursue activities such as reading, creativity, drugs, pornography, video games and leisure. Anons who choose to not have kids may or may not engage in the workforce, seeing it either as a means to achieving a particular level of wealth, or yet another trap to be avoided in the postmodern/meta-modern world.

File: angel.jpg (8KB, 194x259px)

8KB, 194x259px

>>129913068
> Critiquing the reasons to have kids
> biological imperative
One of the most common rejoinders to the idea that anons have a biological imperative to have kids is that we are not merely animals. Whether rooted in a humanist or religious perspective, anons will typically rebel against the idea that we must simply follow our animal urges, believing that we have the capacity to sublimate those desires into other outlets and 'higher' aspirations such as academic research, spiritual contemplation, or creative pursuits.
> Emotional satisfaction
I don't really think there is a compelling rejoinder to this point
> Man up
Childless/childfree anons will almost always center their rhetoric on this line of reasoning, as they despise the system which they find themselves enmeshed in, and care nothing about GDP, productivity, or whatever other metric the Jews who run the system fret about.
> Demographic replacement
Nihilistically minded anons will respond that they do not care what happens when they die, as the consequences for demographic replacement are more likely to manifest themselves in two or three generations, and if anons are smart, they will be able to set themselves up to avoid "enrichment"

>>129914855
> critiquing the reasons to not have kids
> Pessimism
One of the most difficult points to argue with, as the statistics underlying anon's pessimism is well founded. Whether one examines the proportion of women who are still virgins at 21, average income versus purchasing power, percentage of pro-sharia Muslims, etc. etc, there are innumerable reasons to feel blackpilled. Religious anons would say that their hope is not in this life, but in the next, and more or less ignore these concerns. Anons who are not religious have a much tougher time of it, as there appear to be fewer and fewer bright spots to focus on in this plane of existence. I'd appreciate some other points of view on this, because this is where I am at personally.

>>129915642
Bump, c'mon /pol/, I'm trying to figure out whether or not I will have kids

>>129918086
Don't have kids, Leaf, more space for mine.